By now, if you have followed my recent postings, you realize that Barack Obama could understand and get along with radicals like Frank Marshall Davis, Derrick Bell, Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers and his co-terrorist wife, Bernadine Dohrn because they share similar ideological influences. One of them is Saul Alinsky, a left-wing community organizer who fought to bring jobs and government services to Chicago neighbourhoods until his death in 1972. If there were an American-hater's Mount Rushmore, Saul Alinsky would be on it.
Alinsky's disciples, the very organizers who had worked with the man himself, were the ones who hired Obama as a community organizer in Chicago in 1985. Obama has also trained hundreds of others in Alinsky's dubious methods. Obama would later say that "his years as an organizer gave him the best education of his life." The immensity of Alinsky's influence in Democratic politics is demonstrated by his influence in the lives of the two top Democrats in the White House: Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Alinsky opens his groundbreaking book, Rules for Radicals with this disturbing dedication:
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins -- or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the Establishment and did so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom -- LUCIFER.
I suppose it could have been worse. He could have dedicated his book to that deadshit George Soros. Even liberals eventually figured out that they shouldn't be praising Satan in public, so the Lucifer-as-inspiration paragraph was purged from subsequent editions so that Alinsky's ideas could be spread more easily among clergymen. That's exactly what happens to most Democrats ideas -- as soon as they are said out load, normal people react with revulsion, so Democrats learn to pretend they never said them; I did not play the race card! I did not say I would meet with Ahmadinejad without preconditions!
Obama was a master of Alinsky's tactics and understood his philosophy well. Mike Kruglik, a fellow organizer, elaborated, "Obama was the undisputed master agitation. With probing, sometimes personal questions, he would pinpoint the source of pain, tearing down their egos just enough before dangling the Carrot of Hope that they could make things better." (Sound familiar???) Alinsky urged his followers not to display class hatred toward the middle classes -- at least not overtly. Instead, he offered a narrative of class condescension, which viewed the confused, aimless and pitiable. Obama still today can be caught displaying this same radical condescension to the middle class and businessmen in general.
In this year's presidential campaign, the two sides seem to operate under different sets of rules. The GOP thinks the game runs under standard rules of fair play. Democrats play under Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals." Alinsky's primer can be summed up, "Win At Any Cost." Justice is not embodied i the process. The process is just a means of getting our way. Under these rules, any tactic (and any lie) is fine as long as it serves the agenda. The ends justify the means. Using Alinsky's rules, you don't let the opposition be heard; rather you drown them out. If the population gets only one side of the story that side wins. Diabolical? Yes...remember who he dedicated his book to. In fact, in an interview with Playboy he said, "If there is an afterlife and I have anything to say about it, I will unreservedly choose to go to Hell." Playboy: Why? Alinsky: "Hell would be Heaven for me. All my life I've been with have-nots. If you're a have-not in Hell, you're short of virtue. Once I get there I'll start organizing them.'' Playboy: Why them? Alinsky: "They're my kind of people!''
The Way I See It....Obama's leftist/neoMarxist liberals always seem to be clamoring to rip out some functional necessity of American society so they can replace it with an ill-defined hodgepodge of ideas that they think will shift power their way . Polarization is at the core of the Left's strategy. What's wrong with giving it back to them and point out how hostile the Democratic Party has become to Christianity. Why not point out the truth that most white liberals ("progressives" is the fad word now) are racists who think black Americans are too stupid and incompetent to compete with white Americans, which is why they push Affirmative Action. Why not note that progressives want poor Americans to stay poor and dependent, because as long as they do, they'll keep voting for the handouts from the Democratic Party.
There's are reason Barack Obama bows to foreign leaders, is constantly apologizing for America and attended an anti-white, anti-American church for 20 years. The sad truth is that this cabal of commies in the White House hate and despise the United States. Why do yo think "hope and change" appealed so much to Obama and his Chicago cronies that he made it his theme? When you look at America as evil, racist, unfair, a horrible place to live inhabited by ignorant trash and no-hopers, what else would you do other than hope for change and force it to happen with Socialist ideas and methods. Americans....if you love your country and the values it represents, those people in the White House not only don't share your values, they hold people like you in utter contempt!