Tuesday, February 20, 2018

BUSTED: HERE’S THE ONE ANTI-TRUMP TEXT MESSAGE THAT WILL CRUMBLE THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION


Since Day 1, we knew that this whole Mueller investigation was a witch hunt by the deep state to take out President Trump, and this brand new batch of text messages from FBI agents is the smoking gun evidence.


In the hustle and bustle of the Alabama Senate election last night, you might have missed that Fox News got hold of 10,000 text messages from Anti-Trump FBI agents that were working on the Russia investigation.
After sifting through many of the messages, the most damning text reveals a plot to take out Trump even BEFORE he was elected.
Here’s a more in-depth analysis of this from Ben Shapiro (below) at the Daily Wire:
On Wednesday, CNN published text messages between the former second-in-command in FBI counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, and his mistress and co-worker Lisa Page (below). Strzok was involved in the Hillary Clinton email investigation, instrumental in helping to launch the investigation into supposed collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, and staffed on the Trump-Russia investigation itself.
Now, one of those texts may wound the special investigation beyond repair.
That text is dated August 15, 2016. Strzok texted Page, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe’s] office that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…
This looks an awful lot like motivation for launching an investigation into Trump in order to sink Trump as a hedge against Trump’s victory. The FBI’s investigation into Russian governmental interference in the election began in July 2016, just weeks before Strzok’s text message. And that means that there is now more of a smoking gun of FBI corruption against Trump than there is of Trump colluding with Russia.
How can Mueller come back from that? He’s fired Strzok and Page, but if the investigation was initially a political hit job, how can it now turn into something good and decent, particularly in the absence of a smoking gun regarding collusion? It’s not just that this is fruit of the poisonous tree — there’s no fruit to show, just the poisonous tree. And as Victor Davis Hanson has written, the Mueller team is filled top-to-bottom with political activists who have a specific anti-Trump agenda.
The Way I See It.......this seems to be some pretty damning evidence that this entire investigation was a sham to begin with. It never had any substance…they just wanted to do EVERYTHING they could to take out Trump!!!

Mueller Indictments May Have Been Plagiarized From Media Sources !


Mueller's recent indictment against Russians mimics reports in media from years ago.


Special Counsel Robert Mueller announced last week indictments against Russians, but a quick cursory search shows those crimes were outlined several years ago. However, it looks like this announcement may not be everything that it claims after some very interesting reports from Buzzfeed as well as The Atlantic surfaced.
Mueller indicted 13 Russian operatives and three Russian entities for using social media to sow discord in the 2016 presidential election.
The problem with his indictment is that liberal news organizations like The Atlantic and BuzzFeed published very similar reports on the Russian efforts several years ago.
Mueller’s indictment charged 13 Russians for using a company based in St. Petersburg called the Internet Research Agency. The indictment says they organized and launched rallies that were both for and against Trump after he won the presidential election.
“Defendants and their co-conspirators used false US personas to organize and coordinate other false US personas to organize and coordinate US political rallies protesting the results of the 2016 presidential election,” said special counsel spokesman Peter Carr, summarizing the indictment.
In 2014, BuzzFeed published a report detailing how the troll group identified in Mueller’s indictment had made their goals and activities well-known to the public.
Max Seddon’s article details how they carried out their scheme:
“The documents show instructions provided to the commenters that detail the workload expected of them. On an average working day, the Russians are to post on news articles 50 times. Each blogger is to maintain six Facebook accounts publishing at least three posts a day and discussing the news in groups at least twice a day.”
“By the end of the first month, they are expected to have won 500 subscribers and get at least five posts on each item a day. On Twitter, the bloggers are expected to manage 10 accounts with up to 2,000 followers and tweet 50 times a day.”
The Atlantic published a similar report in 2013 detailing how the Russians were carrying out a social media scheme to create discord among Americans over political issues.
“The effect created by such Internet trolls is not very big, but they manage to make certain forums meaningless because people stop commenting on the articles when these trolls sit there and constantly create an aggressive, hostile atmosphere toward those whom they don’t like.”
“These include commentary systems on the web sites of every major media outlet in the city that the trolls began to occupy a long time ago and react to certain news with torrents of mud and abuse.”
Are we really to believe the FBI and other government agencies were unaware of these Russian efforts since 2013?
More importantly, Mueller’s indictment is disturbingly similar to the BuzzFeed and Atlantic reports. The indictment said Russian trolls created fake accounts using another individual’s persona and worked to play both sides of a political issue to create chaos.
The grand jury indictment revealed the Russian group even organized two rallies in New York City on Nov. 12, 2016. One rally was to support Trump, and the other rally was to oppose Trump.
One of the rallies was called held on Nov. 12 was called, “Trump is NOT my President.” The indictment concretely states the Russian operatives were focused on sowing discord in America, not promoting Trump over Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.
The Way I See It........it is also likely Mueller’s indictment closely resembles the two news media reports so he could save face on the phony Russia collusion investigation.
After nearly a year of investigating and no evidence of collusion or wrongdoing from Trump, the Mueller investigation is grasping for anything at this point to keep the witch hunt going as long as possible.

Monday, February 19, 2018

WOW!... SO THERE WAS RUSSIAN COLLUSION AFTER ALL !








Yep, a whole trilogy of Russian collusion! Between the Democrats, along with Obama’s Administration and the media.
Russian collusion net has still missed the Don but it seems to have caught the netmaker. The Dems, who chose Russia as the false conspiratorial culprit only because they were aware of how it all worked and it was they, the Dems, who were into it right up to and over their scrawny necks.
The so-called Russian dossier, paid for by the Hillary Clinton camp to the tune of 12 million dollars was designed to dissuade voters from voting for Trump. 
This dodgy dossier, which is full of wild unfounded accusations states that, during a trip to the Moscow Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Trump had hired hookers to perform ‘golden showers’ (urination on him and each other)... and on the Presidential suite bed the Obamas had previously slept in.
This “evidence” was meant to imply that Russian intelligence had taped this “golden shower” performance and that it was one of several forms of “kompromat” (that's Russian for compromising material) they had on Trump that they could and would use as a political lever if ever he (Trump) became President.
           It is likely that Michael Flynn will be rehired after Democrats are arrested 
Unfortunately this false dossier was used as evidence to secure a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant targeting Trump and his campaign (in particular his National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn).
Surveillance on Flynn, which never should have been allowed as it was based entirely on this bogus dossier, was used to catch him out on a lie about a meeting with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak... a meeting that was completely normal and innocuous. 
But Flynn was duly fired anyway for “lying” to an FBI that was more complicit in illegality than Flynn ever was.
Trump had accused the DNC of wire-tapping his Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign. The media including CNN and the DNC had laughed at the proposition all over their leads and tweets for days, but it now appears to have been true.
Deputy FBI Head Andrew McCabe has already resigned with full retirement emoluments
Is this sounding a little like Watergate? Well it’s a thousand times more serious than any Watergate break-in.
To knowingly submit false evidence to a Court in order to acquire a wire-tap warrant to eavesdrop on a political opponent during a Presidential campaign is third world stuff that usually ends in summary executions.
And a serious number of heads, at least 11, must roll after this "memo" dust settles.
Even more serious is the fact that the Obama Administration’s Agencies of the DoJ, FBI and possibly, but not conclusively, the unacountable CIA, were used to try to kill Trump’s hopes of winning the White House.
     
Former FBI Head, James Comey (above) did the DoJ's bidding in protecting Hillary Clinton  from prosecution over her illegal email server.
I can’t imagine a more serious crime other than hiring a hitman to blow Trump's brains out! But these are the Clintons we are dealing with here and it’s likely that that option was seriously considered.
I have spent time in researching the infamous “Washington Post” and “New York Times” and there is no better place that the local watering hole to find out WTF is going on. 
Why didn’t the Washington Post’s young Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein (above) display the same investigative skills in disclosing this current caper as they did with Watergate? 
Well, Nixon who faced and dodged impeachment by resigning, was a Republican! You see, even back then the Press detested Conservatives. They were fair game, as is Trump.
The Way I See It.......those same aging Woodward and Bernstein characters spend most of their time on CNN defending an indefensible Hillary Clinton while widely lambasting Trump.
After all, when you look into it, conservative media (and even cartoonists) world-wide are rarer than hens’ teeth.    

Be Careful What You Wish For !


In today’s crazy world, western politicians are wasting billions of tax-payer dollars force-feeding costly unreliable green energy in the bizarre belief that this will somehow change Earth’s climate.

Even more incredible, they fear global warmth and seem hell-bent on creating global cooling. They should study climate history. It is snow and ice, cold dry air and carbon dioxide starvation we need to fear, not a warm, moist, fertile, bountiful atmosphere.

 Climate change is natural and unstoppable.

Just 20,000 years ago, Earth was in one of its recurring glacial phases. A thick massive ice sheet smothered Canada, Alaska, Iceland, Greenland, North Asia and Europe as far south as London. Much of the animal and plant life of the previous warm era was extinguished. Even in warmer lands not covered by the ice sheet, plants suffered as the cold oceans removed moisture and carbon dioxide plant food from the atmosphere.

Then, because of changing cycles in Earth’s orbit and tilt, reinforced by changing solar cycles, the sun warmed the frozen lands. The great ice sheets melted, sea levels rose and the warming oceans expelled moisture and CO2 plant food into the atmosphere. Plant life recovered. Tundra, forests, grasslands and herbivores advanced towards the pole and fish became abundant in the shallow seas that flooded coastal plains. Hunters, herders, farmers and fishermen followed the food.

Human population increased greatly. They gave thanks for the warmth, and worshipped the sun.

 But the peak of the modern warm era is past, and the natural cycles controlling global temperatures are pointing downwards.

 The Way I See It.....only an idiot with a death wish for life on Earth would attempt to accelerate our inevitable descent into the next ice age.

 Luckily, their costly war on warmth is totally futile, but their war on carbon energy will prove tragically misguided in the cold times ahead.

Monday, February 12, 2018

PROFESSOR CHARGED FOR DOUBTING WARMING ALARMISTS !!


PROFESSOR Peter Ridd is just the latest academic to be punished for challenging the great global warming scare.
Oops. I shouldn’t even have mentioned that James Cook University has ordered Ridd to stop attacking the science behind dodgy claims that global warming is killing the Great Barrier Reef.
You see, JCU insists its dirty work be kept secret. It charged Ridd even for telling his own wife it was trying to censor him, after trawling through his emails for dirt.
What kind of people run this university? They sound to me less like academics than commissars of some Third World tyranny.
No scientific debate today is more important to us than that on the theory that our emissions are warming the world dangerously.
After all, this global warming theory has panicked governments into spending billions of dollars.
They’ve already destroyed a coal-fired electricity system that once gave us cheap and reliable power, even though green power makes no measurable difference to world temperatures.
They’ve spent billions on other green schemes, even though temperatures have risen far less than predicted.
They’ve built desalination plants for Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide — all now mothballed — because they feared a “permanent” drought that never came.
And they’ve thrown our cash at Pacific islands to save them from rising seas, even though more than 80 per cent of those islands have actually grown in size or been stable.
So surely we should question the science behind all this?
Isn’t this how Western civilisation has advanced — by testing beliefs?
Instead, universities have a shameful record of stifling this debate.
Example: the late professor Bob Carter was one of the first scientists anywhere to note that global warming had, in fact, paused — and it stayed paused for most of this century.
Any university should be proud to have an academic who was first to a truth. Instead, Carter lost his position as professor emeritus at JCU, which claimed it was merely cutting costs.
Then there’s world-renowned Professor Bjorn Lomborg, who proved that most schemes to fight global warming cost a fortune without actually cutting temperatures.
For that heresy, academics and students at two universities — Flinders and the University of Western Australia — banned him from setting up his fully funded Copenhagen Consensus Centre in Australia.
And now there’s Peter Ridd.


A Green sea turtle at Lady Elliot Island, part of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

Ridd is a professor of physics and attached to JCU’s Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, and he has long warned that much scientific research is not properly checked.
“I have published numerous scientific papers showing that much of the ‘science’ claiming damage to the (Great Barrier Reef) is either plain wrong or greatly exaggerated,” he said last week.
“As just one example, coral growth rates that have supposedly collapsed along the reef have, if anything, increased slightly … and mass bleaching events along the reef that supposedly serve as evidence of permanent human-caused devastation are almost certainly completely natural.”
He says the reef is actually “in excellent condition”, and largely regrows after bleaching or cyclones.


Professor Peter Ridd says the Great Barrier Reef is actually “in excellent condition”

“Some parts of the southern reef, for example, have seen a tripling of coral in six years after they were devastated by a particularly severe cyclone.”
Ridd may be right or wrong. Either way, this is a critical debate, yet JCU is trying to shut it down.
It pounced after Ridd last year went on Sky News to outline his arguments, adding: “We can no longer trust the scientific organisations like the Australian Institute of Marine Science, even things like the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies.”
JCU found him guilty of “serious misconduct” and of lacking “collegiality” — meaning “groupthink”.
It has further accused him of denigrating the university and a colleague, and of breaching confidentiality.


Beautiful Underwater photography of a Green Turtle

Some of those alleged breaches were nothing more than Ridd telling his own wife that the university was punishing him. He is now fighting in the Federal Court to defend his academic freedom.
This has so far cost him $95,000 in legal fees, but thank heavens many Australians still think free speech is worth defending.
Ridd’s go-fund-me appeal raised the money in just two days.
But this case is not only about free speech. It is also about whether scientific debates are settled by censorship or by debate.
A mainstay of Western civilisation is on trial here. So why hasn’t federal Education Minister Simon Birmingham stepped in?
Why has Chief Scientist Alan Finkel not protested against this muzzling of a scientist? Where are the other academics defending their most sacred traditions?

The Way I See It.......It doesn't take a genius to see that marine scientists have a vested interest in keeping their snouts in the Warming Subsidies trough thereby stifling scientific inquiry that doesn't support the dogma they have established !!

Saturday, February 3, 2018

FBI Agents Terrified: Congressional Examination Of Files May Be Undoing Of Mueller’s Witch Hunt !


Mueller witch hunt in hot water as heavy rumors swirl that the highest officials of the FBI and State Department were on the Clinton Foundation payroll.

For nearly a year, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been conducting an inquisition-like witch hunt into non-existent collusion between President Trump and Russia. With a pair of Mueller’s investigators outed as members of an extensive Hillary Clinton FBI “fan club,” the “treasonous acts” Peter Strzok and Lisa Page committed have fellow Hillary biased agents terrified. After months of piling up evidential firewood to burn President Trump at the stake with, they just found out Congress will actually get to take a look over their shoulders at all of it.


The thing that has them really twisted up is that most of what they found points at the Clintons. How many more agents and DOJ lawyers are similarly guilty of treason? Covering up for Hillary, as the one colluding with Russians and conspiring to rig the election is a no-no. So far, all the evidence points to Uranium One and pay-for-play schemes at the State Department. Worse, there are heavy rumors that the highest officials of the FBI and State Department were on the Clinton Foundation payroll.
In the Summer leading up to the 2016 election, James Comey got handed the hot potato of announcing the decision on the Clinton email server investigation. It appears that even though the FBI had uncovered evidence of misconduct that qualified as “gross negligence” which is a crime, the wording of the report was downgraded by Peter Strzok to “extreme carelessness,” which is not a crime. Hillary did nothing wrong Comey claimed.
Comey was given the honor after Attorney General Loretta Lynch got busted having a secret meeting with Bill Clinton on an Arizona runway and recused herself from the case. Then, in a bizarre reversal just before the election, Comey waffled and said the investigation was back open again. The reason? Hillary emails, that Huma Abedin was not supposed to have, ended up on her husband’s laptop. The same laptop that “Carlos Danger” used to pick up an underage girl.

Mueller’s investigators outed as members of an extensive Hillary Clinton FBI “fan club.”
On Jan. 11 the Justice Department turned over the first batch of records demanded by Devin Nunes on behalf of two government oversight watchdog committees. Both the House Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee subpoenaed the records last August. The DOJ initially lied and said they didn’t exist but were caught red-handed when Rod Rosenstein admitted to them in a recent congressional hearing.
Instead of making copies of the sensitive materials, access was provided in a secure location to over 1.2 million documents. The records include not only reports and summaries of interviews conducted by Mueller’s investigators, they date back to the 2016 investigation into Hillary Clinton’s secret email server. Even more documents are expected to be produced “in the coming days.”
One of Capitol Hill’s many moles scampered off with a copy of the letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and his deputy Rod Rosenstein, listing the documents requested. The list seems to “dovetail with areas that the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, is investigating, such as the handling of the Clinton probe.” According to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) “We want the information that Horowitz has.” He also mentioned interrogation sessions “are being arranged with seven FBI and Justice Department officials, as well as others.”
In a last-ditch effort to thwart the committees which properly provide supervision over the Justice Department, they showed up on Paul Ryan’s doorstep to cry on his shoulder. What he told them amounted to “suck it up, guys. bite the bullet and turn it over.” Ryan would have loved to have told them there was some magic legal spell that could be used to make the records disappear but this time, there isn’t one. What a Congressional oversight committee asks for, they get.
The only semi-legitimate excuses they can give for hiding information from Congress is that “forms identifying FBI informants” would be handed over. If that happened, they say they might “withhold sensitive information from future reports.” The FBI isn’t afraid the safety of these people will be put at stake by identification, they are afraid Congress will learn the truth. In order to hide things from their bosses in the future, they just won’t write them down.
Another source claims that if informants know they may be caught leaking classified intelligence by ratting to the FBI as a “confidential informant” they won’t be opening up as easily as they have in the past.
According to a former senior agent, “the credibility of the FBI is on the line.” All eyes are now on Director Christopher Wray, who assumed control last August. Everyone is watching to see “how assertive the director will be in defending them and other career officials and whether he’ll refuse to hand over documents that might compromise covert sources and operations.”
Director Wray hasn’t publicly responded to President Trump’s suggestion of treason but in the past, he “repeatedly defended the integrity and professionalism of the FBI workforce in speeches and congressional testimony.”
The Way I See It......James Rybicki, FBI Chief of Staff, is the next one scheduled for an intense grilling. The hot lights and blow-torch will be warmed up for a closed-door session on Thursday by both of the house committees.

Monday, January 29, 2018

WE NEED TO GET MORE AUSSIE WOMEN PREGNANT !

…or foster more foreign babies !


The baby boom of the sixties saw women on average bearing 3.5 babies but now that figure has dropped to an appalling 1.4 babies. Australia needs 2.2 babies from every fertile woman or it will devolve into a third world economy.
The world average is 2.7 with Islamic countries leading the way with over 4 babies per multiple female and well ahead of Italy, Greece, Japan and Germany at around 1.2 births per fertile woman.
Paid parental leave and childcare largesse is not convincing women that pollination is the source of all life. 
The increase in preferred gay life styles and homosexual men who lack an interest in females is a serious problem and we normal blokes will be arrested for showing a healthy interest in the opposite sex.
If we are ever to recover from this lack of fertility we will need to address the onslaught on normal heterosexual men having a normal healthy predilection for yummy sheilas. It’s hard to pollinate a woman if you are not allowed to touch her, perve on her or even send her a suggestive text without being accused of sexual harassment.
We humans are one of the few species who can actually engage in sex without it being a bothersome conduit for procreation. So there are plenty of horny blokes around ready to risk impregnation compared to women who prefer to stay unpregnant and married to their employment status for decades into middle age.
Women dress to the nines hoping to get lucky but only lucky in sex itself… the thought of pregnancy is horrific and they will do anything to avoid it. That’s a shame but it’s a movement that is not diminishing so we must find ways to reverse it.
The modern woman is happy to bed as many blokes as possible without getting pregnant before the age of 35. She is then left with a few tenuously short years to make up the numbers.
Popular Canadian author and free-speech advocate Mark Steyn (above) says Western societies are a dying demographic. “Low birth rates have put Western societies like Australia into a demographic death spiral.''
“Australia is below replacement level and without a sociological pivot that death spiral will continue”, Steyn warns.
So what do we do? We can’t compete with Muslim blokes who all seem to be on disability pensions with plenty of time for pollinating all of their four wives. And of course Australia’s safety net is there to catch them all. While we Aussie blokes have to pretend to be dedicated pillow biters or we get arrested.
There was a bloke who, each evening at Flinders Street station, asked every one of 10 thousand women who were going home if they would like a shag. He was asked by a bystander if he got a lot of knockbacks. “Bloody hell yeah”, he said, “but I get a lot of shags ‘tho.”
Is it a numbers game after all? No, and it shouldn’t be. But isn’t asking a sheila out to dinner much the same thing? And if she lets you kiss her goodnight will she allow you grab her bum? Or does the fact you even try indicate you are guilty of sexual harassment? Bloody hell, things have changed, and I cannot see how it’s for the better with gay marriage now the “in” thing.
The feminist Left is more engaged in late term abortions than nurturing a healthy baby.
The Way I See It........those two lumps on a woman’s chest are not just a cleavaged excuse for a fashion statement, they were designed solely to feed babies. 
The choice still remains… have more Aussie babies or be run over by Islamic ones.