Friday, January 20, 2017

A TRUMP VICTORY MAY HAVE BEEN MORE IMPORTANT THAN WE FIRST THOUGHT......

............as the CIA's Islamisation of the White House was well underway !

Californian journalist, Michael Hastings, was working on a story about CIA Director John Brennan’s conversion to Islam and another CIA operative who had converted to Islam, Andrew Warren. The journalist died in a suspicious fiery auto accident in California in June 2013, just three months after Obama had appointed Brennan as CIA Director.
Obama had wanted to appoint Brennan as CIA Director way back in 2009, but there was Congressional opposition to his nomination. The actual reasons for that opposition remain unclear as none of the interrogators pinpointed or even queried his reported close relationship with Islam.
Now I am far from a conspiracy theorist but at least 48 people have died suspiciously during the Clintons' rule and many of those had claimed to be exposers of White House Islamic connections. It makes ex KGB Putin's activities look boy scoutish.
Six more high profile anti-Clinton activists have met suspicious deaths that have not been investigated.
Although Brennan has denied the charges heatedly and repeatedly when they first surfaced early in 2014, Brennan has now admitted and apologised for CIA Agency employees having spied on a Congressional Intelligence Committee set up to investigate torture during the Bush years. The CIA had "improperly accessed" computers used to catalogue the committee's investigation. 
In a statement that followed the revelations, Sen. Udall among many others, declared, "I have no choice but to call for the resignation of CIA Director John Brennan." The calls were ignored by Obama.
You don’t need to be a member of Mensa to conclude that Obama, if not a Muslim himself, was extremely sympathetic to Muslims and would not tolerate any criticism of Islam, despite Islam forecasting the demise of democracy and declaring the eventual destruction of the West and Israel through jihadism.
It was also concerning that Obama installed a new fence around the White House recently and after closer inspection many people aren't too happy with it's peculiar design. All changes or improvements must go directly through Obama's Office so there's no denying he knew exactly what was taking place only steps away from America's iconic White House. They made sure to add in one not so subtle feature that has many Americans calling for it to be taken down.
One patriotic photographer made sure to snap a pic (above) of the new design built into the fence that surrounds the White House. Included in the revamped fence are what appear to be small Islamic minarets like the ones from the Ottoman Empire. This type of classic Islamic architecture is commonplace in countries like Turkey and Saudi Arabia, but lining the fence of the White House in Washington, DC, they do offend and indicate where Obama's allegiances lie.
We all know the Obama crew and the UN would love to see Israel pushed into the Mediterranean Sea, as Muslims promise they will do, and the Obama/Kerry nuclear deal with Iran has made that more than likely unless Israel alone takes out the Iranian nuclear facilities which will plunge the Middle East into a full on war, with Obama from his golf club rooting for everyone bar the Israelis. 
At the National Security Council and at the CIA, Brennan has, like Obama, forbidden the use of the term “jihadist” to describe Islamic terrorists. Obama has refused to mention the word “terrorism” and “Islam” in the same sentence, preferring to use ridiculous descriptions like, “workplace violence” or “merely a lone wolf” and on each occasion ignoring the murderers’ Arabic screams of “Allahu Akbar”.


There is ample evidence to suggest that CIA Director Brennan had not only converted to Islam, but had embraced the worst of all Islamic sects, Saudi Arabia’s extreme form known as Wahhabism, Obama's preferred sect and the cult that bore Osama bin Laden and Afghanistan’s student-inspired Taliban. 
The Saudis also run the world-wide $3 trillion scam of halal  accreditation. 
When Brennan was sworn in to head the CIA and refused to take the oath on the bible (above) the allegations of his conversion to Islam began to gain momentum.
Peter Baker and Mark Mazzetti wrote in the normally (small l) liberal New York Times that, ... in the 67 years since the CIA was founded, few presidents have had as close a bond with their intelligence chief as Obama has forged with Mr Brennan. It is a relationship that has shaped the policy and politics of the debate over the nation’s war with terrorist organisationsas well as the Agency’s own struggle to balance security and liberty.”
After assuming Office the Obama Administration collected lists of Muslim candidates to fill positions in the White House and to head various Agencies, according to previously unseen emails sent to the manager of Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign, John Podesta. The emails were released by Wikileaks.  
                              Obama and Podesta (2nd from right) on Air Force One
Podesta was also a former Chief of Staff for President Bill Clinton. (Here is the actual email, the names on what appear to be comprehensive lists of eligible Muslims available for Administration jobs are not yet disclosed.)
"From: Bansal, Preeta Democrat (NYC) Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 11:01 PM To:Froman, Michael B Cc: 'Onek, Matthew' 
"Subject: Asian American Candidates, Muslim American Candidates Here are the compiled lists of Asian American and Muslim American candidates for top Administration jobs, sub-cabinet jobs, and outside boards/agencies/policy committees. A couple things to note about the list of Muslim American candidates: 
1) In the candidates for top jobs, I excluded those with some Arab American background but who are not Muslim (e.g., George Mitchell). Many Lebanese Americans, for example, are Christian. In the last list (of outside boards/commissions), most who are listed appear to be Muslim American, except that a handful (where noted) may be Arab American but of uncertain religion (esp. Christian). 
"2) There is only one candidate I thought was a viable one for a Secretary-level job among the Muslim Americans. That said, on both lists, there are some very senior people listed in the last category (for outside boards/commissions) who conceivably could be considered for top jobs. The very senior people I put on the last list tended not to be terribly involved in politics or policy, or in the case of some Asian Americans, had already served in the Clinton and even Carter Administrations and so I thought we should seek new talent. 
"But there's no magic to some of the placements. I think the lists are fairly exhaustive, but some of the people may be moved to other categories. 
3) High-profile Muslim Americans tend to be the subject of a fair amount of blogger criticism, and so the individuals on this list would need to be ESPECIALLY carefully vetted. I suspect some of the people I list would not survive such a vet -- but I do personally know, at least in part, virtually all of the candidates in the 1st two categories (but I know very few of those listed for outside boards/commissions). 
4) I listed the elected Muslim American democratic officials at the end of the second category, but for various reasons, I didn't think any of them would necessarily be suitable for an Administration appointment. Nevertheless, I wanted to flag them for you in case you wanted to evaluate them further. DOJ list will be coming in the next two days. Judges and US Attorneys will still take about 10 days. Let me know if the latter are needed sooner."
This is clear evidence that Obama was deliberately including Muslims and excluding Christians from senior Administration positions. 
Obama’s Islamisation of his Administration and the White House was evident from day one. It’s worth noting that although the Democrats deny Julian Assange’s credibility, they have never denied the veracity of any released email.
An interesting caller to the New York radio station “Ground Zero”, who refused to be identified, said this on September 18, 2014: “All 19 9/11 hijackers? Where did they get their visas stamped before they came to this country to launch 9/11? They got their visas stamped at the CIA station in Jeda. And the second in command said, ‘No way, absolutely we are not going to stamp those visas.’ And the fellow who was in charge at the time, his name was John Brennan, he was the person who overrode that instruction and ordered the visas be stamped right there in Jeda.”  ...The rest is history
Brennan is the highest-ranking U.S. official ever to have visited the Islamic holy city of Mecca during the Haaj, a privilege reserved only for serious Muslim pilgrims or special guests of the Saudi King.
A few weeks before the Senate voted to confirm Brennan as CIA director in 2013, former FBI agent John Guandolo revealed that Brennan had indeed converted to Wahhabist Islam while he was CIA Station Chief in Riyadh.
Brennan has shuttled frequently between his home in Virginia to Jerusalem, and Riyadh to coordinate the arms transfers and other logistical support to ISIS and the rebels in Syria and Iraq. Witnesses in Syria, claim to have seen CIA and Israeli Mossad commandos transferring weapons to ISIS and affiliated forces at US request/direction.
Obama may have described ISIS fighters as a “Junior Varsity” team but appears to have done his best to promote them to the NFL. 
No fewer than 80 different groups of rebels were/are still fighting in Syria including many ISIS, Al Queda, Khorasan and Muslim Brotherhood affiliates, all intent on taking out Assad and grabbing more than their fair share of the booty from the vacuum, despite Assad’s massive Russian support. 
[Both Turkey and Russia are at odds with the US by supporting the Assad regime and ostensibly killing ISIS fighters but NATO member Turkey is only interested in killing the stateless Kurds and Russia the jihadist Syrian rebels. But as a result of Putin's efforts alone ISIS is now on the run.] 

Obama claimed that he only ordered “moderate” Muslims be armed in the fight to unseat al-Assad, such was his determination to add the democratically elected Assad to the list of regime changes that has so far caused a million deaths and four million displaced Muslims now, or soon to be, resident in Europe and north America where many are free to plot further terrorist attacks on innocent civilians.
The U.S. House of Representatives finally made a bold move against Obama’s plan to allow thousands of Syrian Islamic refugees into America. The plan was for in excess of 100,000.
Another Obama term in Office might possibly have seen Islamic rule from the White House, a move Obama has said he would support if it came down to a choice. A Trump election victory may have been more important than first thought. 

It’s also worth noting that neither the Saudis nor any other peninsula State has any interest in housing the Europe-bound refugees but rather they have agreed to shelter dozens of the worst jihadists Obama has released from the off-shore Guantanamo facility...many of these high-end prisoners (above) are known to have already returned to the battle field.
Brennan was to the CIA what Hoover was to the FBI... both knew too much to be dismissed, but every last vestige of Brennan's Islamised CIA will be vanquished by Trump. 
         It's now clear why Trump does not trust Obama's Islamised Intelligence Community.
Funny but these Left Western leaders who promote the rise and rise of Islam never seem to be at risk of death by terrorists themselves, only the people they have sworn to protect are at risk.
There must be a special place in hell reserved for Merkel and Obama,... and certainly John Brennan.

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

A Legacy ???........What a Shameful Legacy Barack !!


You know there’s something wrong when a new world order communist, an avowed egalitarian socialist and UN-infatuated global warmist like Obama takes a kerosene spewing Boeing 747 to his golf games. What’s wrong is that Barack Obama is in the same mould as our Julia Gillard when it comes to leaving office gracefully with a pocket full of ill-gotten cash after planting dozens of land mines for the incoming government.
This black President is accusing Putin of debasing his glorious (read inglorious) legacy by hacking the Democrats’ emails during the election. Well, it may have been Moscow or possibly Cuba, or any  IT-competent eighth grader who disclosed emails about candidate Clinton. Possible only because it was her illegal email server, tucked away in her laundry somewhere, that was fair game for anyone with an interest in dirty politics. 
Every country hacks other countries’ servers... it’s too easy. Even China hacks our emails and somehow got hold of the new ASIO building’s blueprints that detailed critical wiring. The walls had to be removed and rewired as a result.
Feigned shock by the Democrats that the Ruskies actually hacked a rogue Clinton server is more an attempt to de-legitimise Trump’s election win. They will now continue that process hoping to gain miles of lost ground in the 2018 mid-term elections. But I suspect Trump will be further ahead by then because successful businessmen are far smarter than undemocratic politicians who lock themselves in their own private windowless dungeons. And don’t forget that Islam is violently opposed to democracy.
Most interesting was that the Democrats did not contest or deny the accuracy of any email. Many of them resigned on the basis that the emails were indeed genuine. A hacker certainly did not “meddle” in the election, that's an impossibility. Whoever it was, merely observed both Parties’ emails, but the Democrats’ emails proved far more entertaining. Anyway, Assange declared it was not the Russians who supplied WikiLeaks with the Podesta and Clinton emails... not that Assange can be trusted with the truth. Who knows and really, who cares? 
“Interfering in the election”, says Obama? What a load of frog shit, as was proved by the Greens’ recounts that actually showed it was Hillary Clinton who had unfairly accumulated too many votes, not Trump.
The Democrats want to imply that Trump’s election was engineered by the Russians, and therefore illegitimate. But even the dishonest Democrats privately admit it is a ridiculous proposition. But the White House can be charged with far more than hacking emails... It is guilty of changing foreign regimes, and what a mess they have made of those! 
The interesting addendum to Obama’s endless list of disasters is that it was he, yes Obama, who did much more than hack a foreign nation’s emails. He used US taxpayers’ funds to skew the democratic Egyptian general election in favour of his terrorist friends, the Muslim Brotherhood and its leader, Mohammed Morsi! (above)
Mr Morsi won that election but he barely had time to change the curtains in one of Cairo’s three Presidential palaces, before he was swept from Office and arrested, much to the chagrin of Obama’s White House. Nonetheless, Obama tried to mitigate this devastating loss by employing an army of his beloved and now footloose Muslim Brethren in Washington DC.
Obama’s more recent attempt at a foreign regime change was the use of millions more in taxpayers’ funds in an attempt to unseat the Right wing Netanyahu and fill the Knesset with Left wing Islamic terrorist sympathisers along with supporters of the Palestinians’ terrorist arm, Hamas, an organisation that also insists on the complete eradication of the Jewish State.
Obama also ensured Iran a path to nuclear weapons aimed at Tel Aviv. 
And Obama has the temerity to accuse the Russians of merely hacking emails which, even Obama would have to agree, had bugger all to do with the election result!  
Those who found it hard to believe that Obama’s true affection lay deep in Muslim terrorism and a hatred for Israel, should now be convinced after he supported the Palestinians over loyal US ally, Israel, in a UN resolution he was historically relied upon to veto. He didn't.
That shouldn’t be too much of a surprise, after all he did say that, "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”  And the winds have now shifted in an ugly direction for Obama, with the help of aberrant Islamic UN member nations who have been joined by a despicable New Zealand, ahead of Russia's and Iraq's imminent destruction of ISIS headquarters, al Raqqa.
Obama’s true ambitions have become crystal clear now that he is being discarded to history with the reputation of the worst, most unpatriotic and pro Islamic President ever. He is on a hiding to nothing over the next three weeks and his real colour is in sharp focus at last. 
Trump will not be able to unwind that despicable United Nations resolution but he may be able to unwind the corrupt UN organisation itself. There is a good chance he might wander over to East 42nd Street, New York, during his lunch break and declare the UN building a doss house refuge for New York’s homeless, you know, those people the socialists Obama and Clinton never gave a damned fig about.
It won’t be all that difficult to dismantle the UN as the multitude of Islamic African and Middle Eastern nations that infect the premises never cough up their dues leaving US taxpayers to cover almost a quarter of the $8 billion in yearly running costs of the East Side brothel. 
The Way I See It.......Trump can defund it and withdraw from Permanent Security Council Membership to be followed shortly thereafter by France, and maybe even the UK, rendering the whole organisation defunct and leaving only Russia and China to play with each others’ dongers while the new Secretary General appoints even more observers to view the atrocities in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other hot spots. “Repeal and replace”, as the Don likes to say.
He would also be repealing (but not replacing) the UN’s IPCC which has spent a king’s ransom trying to convince the world of global warming, a hoax Australia’s loony Left, many of whom are among Turnbull’s Liberals and still embrace global warming as part of a world wide redistribution of income.
Kevin Rudd would have made a wonderful replacement for the corrupt Ban Ki-Moon.

Is it just me or are there others who sense some big and long overdue changes afoot? 

Thursday, December 29, 2016

Why don't Humans have a Penis Bone? Scientists may now know !


It can be as long as a finger in a monkey. In the walrus, it can be two feet long. But the human male has lost it completely. And researchers are a little stumped.
Known as the baculum to scientists with an interest, the penis bone is a marvel of evolution. It pops up in mammals and primates around the world, but varies so much in terms of length and whether it is present at all, that it is described as the most diverse bone ever to exist.
Prompted by the extraordinary differences in penis bone length found in the animal
kingdom, scientists set out to reconstruct the evolutionary story of the baculum, by tracing its appearance in mammals and primates throughout history.
They found that the penis bone evolved in mammals more than 95 million years ago and was present in the first primates that emerged about 50 million years ago. From that moment on, the baculum became larger in some animals and smaller in others. The stump-tailed macaque, an animal that weighs only 10kg, has an extremely long baculum for its size, with the bone extending for 5cm. The bone is five times the size of the baculum in the collared mangabey, which is a slightly larger monkey.
Kit Opie who led the study at University College London, said that penis bone length was longer in males that engaged in what he called “prolonged intromission.” In plain
English, that means that the act of penetration lasts for more than three minutes, a strategy that helps the male impregnate the female while keeping her away from competing males. The penis bone, which attaches at the tip of the penis rather than the base, provides structural support for male animals that engage in prolonged intromission.
In chimps, the penis bone is no longer than a human fingernail. The tininess of the bone correlates with the very short spell that the male spends mating, in the order of seven seconds. In chimpanzee groups, females mate with all the males, in what appears to be a strategy to reduce the risk of her children being killed by older males. “It gives each male an idea that they may have fathered the subsequent offspring, and it is in her interests to get that done quickly,” Opie said.
Humans may have lost their penis bones when monogamy emerged as the dominant reproductive strategy during the time of Homo erectus about 1.9 million years ago, the scientists believe. In monogamous relationships, the male does not need to spend a long time penetrating the female, because she is not likely to be leapt upon by other amorous males. That, at least, is the theory.
“We think that is when the human baculum would have disappeared because the mating system changed at that point,” Opie said. “This may have been the final nail in the coffin for the already diminished baculum, which was then lost in ancestral humans.” Details of the research are published in Proceedings of the Royal Society.
The Way I See It......with the reduced competition for mates, you are less likely to need a baculum, Despite what we might want to think, we are actually one of the species that comes in below the three minute cut-off where these things come in handy. I'm sure most wives can verify this fact.

Time to Trump the Climate Hysteria !


The Clexit Coalition has pledged to assist any government or politician seeking to exit the Paris Agreement and to curb the wasteful and destructive UN/IPCC.
The Secretary of Clexit (Climate Exit Coalition), Mr Viv Forbes (photo left) of Australia, said that Clexit could call on over 190 well-qualified climate realists from 26 countries to provide scientific, business, legal and political support and advice.
 See: http://clexit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/clexit-members.pdf
Clexit sees four main priorities:
Firstly, de-fang the Paris Climate Treaty by refusing to sign it, by ignoring any deals signed by others without a supporting referendum, or by giving notice of formal withdrawal.
The Paris Treaty is now a Toothless Tiger
Secondly, de-fund the global warming industry – no tax payer funding for the UN/IPCC, no government money for climate tourism or conferences, no government grants for climate propaganda posing as “research”, no tax exemptions for green “charities” and no government subsidies for green energy.
Thirdly, de-staff all government climate bureaucracies.
And fourthly, re-educate – ensure that the climate curriculum in schools and universities is based on good science and real evidence, and not political agenda.
These four actions - de-fang, de-fund, de-staff and re-educate will cool the climate hysteria, with huge and immediate benefits for tax payers, jobs, industries and energy costs and security. It will also end the doomsday horror stories terrifying our young people. And if there is additional carbon dioxide in the air, our Earth will be greener and produce more food.
Trump is likely to Slash and Burn the Obama Climate policy:
 http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=c920274f2a364603849bbb505&id=0b5620ebdc&e=816c21f57a
The same sceptical questions are being asked in France, Poland, Hungary, UK, Canada, Russia and Germany; even at the Climate Carnival in Marrakesh, Morocco: http://clexit.net/2016/11/17/marrakech-papers-by-clexit-members/
The Way I See it......Brexit and the Trump revolution are just the start. Have a listen to what happened in Australian Parliamentary offices recently:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwQ6BiqeBcg&feature=youtu.be
 (Both Senator Roberts of Australia and Tim Ball of Canada are Founding Members of Clexit).

CARRIE FISHER didn't Love that Famous STAR WARS Gold Bikini as Much as You did !


As the world continues to try and wrap its head around the fact that we lost Carrie Fisher, a plethora of memories spring to the forefront, ranging from her iconic roles, her contributions to TV and film, her feminist pride, and, of course, her famous Star Wars attire.
Aside from her Princess Leia buns, Fisher’s character brought another style trademark to pop culture when she donned the ever-so-famous gold “slave” bikini in Return of the Jedi.
While many became big fans of the outfit (Ross Gellar wasn’t the only one), and some even channeled their inner Princess Leia for Halloween, the truth of the matter is Fisher didn’t really care for the get-up as much as everyone else did.
The actress told People in 1983, that the “slave Leia” costume wasn’t exactly the most comfortable thing she’s put on, explaining that, “I started checking for any bounce or slip after takes,” adding, “It was, ‘CUT. Hey, how they doin’? The hooters in place?'”
She was also unapologetic about her annoyance with having to constantly be mindful of her body positioning because she didn’t want to have any unflattering angles (#thestruggle).
Fisher once told NPR in an interview, that her scene, “was like, ‘Where am I in all of this?’ … I have to stay with the slug with the big tongue! Nearly naked, which is not a style choice for me. … It wasn’t my choice. When [director George Lucas] showed me the outfit, I thought he was kidding and it made me very nervous. I had to sit very straight because I couldn’t have lines on my sides, like little creases. No creases were allowed, so I had to sit very, very rigid straight.”
There was a payoff, though.
“What redeems it is I get to kill him, which was so enjoyable,” Fisher added. “I sawed his neck off with that chain that I killed him with. I really relished that because I hated wearing that outfit and sitting there rigid straight, and I couldn’t wait to kill him.”
Aside from the discomfort and posture-control, there was a deeper distaste for her ensemble, which stemmed from feeling belittled to a hot bod in a nearly naked outfit. And that’s something she made sure Star Wars actress Daisy Ridley would not tolerate.
You should fight for your outfit,” she reportedly told the star. “Don’t be a slave like I was.”
Despite the rough relationship with her onscreen wardrobe, Fisher still poked fun at the whole thing in her book Wishful Drinking, where she stated that when the time comes, she hopes her obituary would read, “I drowned in moonlight, strangled by my own bra.”
Fisher passed away on Tuesday after she suffered a heart attack on a flight from London to Los Angeles. She was 60 years old.
Speaking on behalf of her daughter Billie Lourd, the family’s spokesman Simon Halls announced the news. “It is with a very deep sadness that Billie Lourd confirms that her beloved mother Carrie Fisher passed away at 8:55 this morning,” he told E! News in a statement. “She was loved by the world and she will be missed profoundly. Our entire family thanks you for your thoughts and prayers.”
While several celebrities and fans have taken to Twitter to mourn the late actress, some of Carrie’s fans in Hollywood found the PERFECT way to honor the 60-year-old.
After a beloved celeb passes, people in the Los Angeles area quite often flock to the artist’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame to pay tribute — but unfortunately, Miz Fisher does NOT have one!
Well, since there are PLENTY of people who love Billie Lourd‘s mom, fans decided to make their OWN star from one of the many blank ones near Grauman’s Chinese Theatre! SO SMART.
One Instagram user took to the picture sharing site to show off the star he made for the Star Wars icon as he posted:
YASSS! What’s MORE amazing, is just a couple hours later, another fan took a snap of the same pop up memorial and it already had a TON of love:
While both of Carrie’s parents, Debbie Reynolds and Eddie Fisher, each have a star on the Walk, we’re sure the late actress will get hers sooner rather than later.
There were also several fans who gathered outside of Grauman’s near where some of the Star Wars characters’ hand and footprints are located in order to pay tribute — though Fisher’s are not included.
We still can’t believe Miz Fisher and now her Mom is gone from a stroke while making funeral arrangements and our hearts go out to all of those affected by this tragic loss. The ladies were last seen together at the 2015 Screen Actors Guild award night.
The Way I See It.......the toughness Carrie showed playing Princess Leia was carried with her through her lifetime. The stress of failed marriages, alcohol and drug abuse always had her come up fighting. She didn't fear death.
“No,” Fisher told the Rolling Stone in an interview posted a month ago, when asked if she feared death. “I fear dying. Anything with pain associated with it, I don’t like. I’ve been there for a couple of people when they were dying; it didn’t look like fun. But if I was gonna do it, I’d want someone like me around. And I will be there!”
Fisher had joked about her future obituary in her 2008 memoir Wishful Drinking and the quote was widely circulated on social media after her death.
The actress said Star Wars creator George Lucas told her she could not wear a bra as Leia because “there’s no underwear in space” and that when one became weightless there, their bra would not expand with their body, so the garment would strangle them.

“Now I think that this would make for a fantastic obit—so I tell my younger friends that no matter how I go, I want it reported that I drowned in moonlight, strangled by my own bra,” Fisher wrote.

Chiropractic Care May Make Your Mind Sharper !




International Researchers Say Chiropractic May Make Your Mind Sharper
Ground-breaking research indicates that chiropractic care may make your brain function better, according to the New Zealand Chiropractors’ Association (NZCA).

A collaborative study on the effects of manipulation of the spine on brain function between Denmark’s Aalborg University, the New Zealand Centre for Chiropractic Research, the Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University and University of Ontario Institute of Technology, published earlier this year[1] in the journal Neural Plasticity suggests that, at least in part, the mechanisms by which spinal manipulation improves performance are due to a change in processing of information at the pre-frontal cortex.

Dr Cassandra Fairest, chiropractor and spokesperson for the NZCA explains: `The focus of chiropractic care is on the health and integrity of the nervous system. The health and function of the
spine affects the entire nervous system. We already know that the spinal cord is an integral part of the central nervous system and processes information just like parts of the brain do[2] and the latest New Zealand research into the effects of chiropractic care suggests that it may have an important role to play in improving executive function.’

Executive function is the mechanism by which the brain integrates and coordinates the operations of multiple neural systems to solve problems and achieve goals based on the ever-changing environment around us[3],[4].

The researchers point out that executive function is considered to be a product of the coordinated operation of various neural systems and is essential for achieving any particular goal. The pre-frontal cortex is believed to be the main brain structure responsible for enabling this coordination and control. It requires planning a sequence of subtasks to accomplish a goal, focusing attention on relevant information as well as inhibiting irrelevant distractors, being able to switch attention between tasks, monitoring memory, initiation of activity, and responding to stimuli[5].

Dr Fairest adds: `A change in pre-frontal activity following chiropractic care may therefore explain and/or link some of the varied improvements in central nervous system function previously observed in other research, such as improved joint position sense error[6], reaction time[7], cortical
processing[8], cortical sensorimotor integration[9], reflex excitability[10], motor control[11], and lower limb muscle strength[12].

`All this research, much of it from the New Zealand College of Chiropractic Centre for Chiropractic Research[13] and funded by the Australian Spinal Research Foundation strongly suggests that chiropractic care/adjustments can significantly improve brain¬-body communication and coordination.’

According to Dr Fairest: `We know that chiropractic care assists brain function in many ways, one of which is proprioceptive function (perception) and this improves the accuracy of the internal brain map so your brain accurately knows what is occurring within your body and the surrounding environment continuously. Environment relates to the processes inside the body, as well as its immediate surroundings’.

The Way I See It.......it seems this research suggests adjusting improves pre-frontal cortex activity, a part of the brain that is responsible for so much higher level function, then it is possible that a chiropractic adjustment could well impact on things like behavior, decision making, memory and attention, intelligence, processing of pain and the emotional response to it would seem that chiropractic really does have a lot to offer!

[1] http://www.hindawi.com/journals/np/2016/3704964/abs/
[2]http://www.queensu.ca/gazette/content/spinalcordprocessesinformationjustareasbrain
[3] S. Funahashi and J. M. Andreau, “Prefrontal cortex and neural mechanisms of executive function,” Journal of Physiology Paris, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 471–482, 2013.
[4] E. E. Smith and J. Jonides, “Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5408, pp. 1657–1661, 1999.
[5] D. Pineda, A. Ardila, M. Rosselli, C. Cadavid, S. Mancheno, and S. Mejia, “Executive dysfunctions in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,” International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 96, no. 3-4, pp. 177–196, 1998
[6] H. Haavik and B. Murphy, “Subclinical neck pain and the effects of cervical manipulation on elbow joint position sense,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 88–97, 2011.
[7] D. D. Kelly, B. A. Murphy, and D. P. Backhouse, “Use of a mental rotation reaction-time paradigm to measure the effects of upper cervical adjustments on cortical processing: a pilot study,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 246–251, 2000.
[8] H. Haavik-Taylor and B. Murphy, “Cervical spine manipulation alters sensorimotor integration: a somatosensory evoked potential study,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 391–402, 2007
[9] H. H. Taylor and B. Murphy, “Altered central integration of dual somatosensory input after cervical spine manipulation,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 178–188, 2010.
[10] E. Suter, G. McMorland, W. Herzog, and R. Bray, “Conservative lower back treatment reduces inhibition in knee-extensor muscles: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 76–80, 2000
[11] P. Marshall and B. Murphy, “The effect of sacroiliac joint manipulation on feed-forward activation times of the deep abdominal musculature,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 196–202, 2006.
[12] B. Hillermann, A. N. Gomes, C. Korporaal, and D. Jackson, “A pilot study comparing the effects of spinal manipulative therapy with those of extra-spinal manipulative therapy on quadriceps muscle strength,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 145–149, 2006.
[13] Niazi IK, Türker KS, Flavel S, Kinget M, Duehr J & Haavik H. (2015) Changes in H­ reflex and V waves following spinal manipulation. Experimental Brain Research. In press. DOI: 10.1007/s00221­014­4193­5 URL link: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221­014­4193­5

Thursday, December 22, 2016

AUSTRALIANS Want to Know: Who Let in the Sudanese?


The  crime wave in the state of Victoria by people of African descent has been astonishing, with the latest victim  a young woman who was stopped while cycling and carved up by three Africans (one which was a female). I have repeatedly asked in previous blog postings (April 26, 2011) & (January 28, 2014) about the crime-plagued Sudanese : who let them in?      And now we know.
Here is Amanda Vanstone, Immigration Minister in the Howard Government, in January 2007 attacking activists demanding she do more for boat people: At a time when another major refugee crisis is unfolding in Sudan we should be trying to take a broader perspective.The latest refugee crisis in Sudan is not the first. 
Comparatively little is known of this crisis in Australia. This should be a matter of shame to some refugee advocates within Australia...Australia has provided permanent resettlement to more than 10,000 people from southern Sudan in the past three years.
Vanstone was Immigration Minister for all that time, having taken over from Phillip Ruddock in 2003:
In 1984, when Labor held government under Bob Hawke, the intake of Sudanese refugees for resettlement was zero. During the ensuing decade just 34 Sudanese refugees were resettled in Australia. The intake jumped to 354 in 1994-95, heralding a rapidly increasing flow of Sudanese every year, rising to 6147 in 2003-2004. 
Experts such as Paris Aristotle from the Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture say the influx was prompted in part by requests from the UNHCR for Australia to give priority to Africa in refugee resettlement quotas because of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda and the long-running civil war in Sudan..In Australia, Sudanese-born humanitarian entrants have topped the offshore grants list every year since 2003.  
But in 2007 a new Immigration Minister realized a disaster was in the making.
Kevin Andrews, who assumed the role of Immigration Minister on January 30 that year, has turned that sentiment on its head. Within a week of starting in the role, newspapers reported that Andrews planned to seek support from cabinet to drastically reduce the intake of Sudanese refugees because of concerns about a rising tide of Sudanese gangs and related crime. 
Over the course of the year, Andrews's concerns about the alleged inability of
Sudanese refugees to integrate have become more explicit, culminating on Monday when he made plain that integration was to become one of the key criteria for determining refugee resettlement quotas. 
"Some groups don't seem to be settling and adjusting to the Australian way of life as quickly as we would hope, and therefore it makes sense to ... slow down the rate of intake from countries such as Sudan," he said.
Naturally, moral grand-standers of the Left refused to believe there was a problem:
New England independent deadshit MP Tony Windsor is not convinced the latest debate does not have an electoral purpose.."Philip Ruddock for years, when the boat-people situation was on, used to say, 'We've got to look after the Africans'. "They seem to have settled in quite well... Kevin Andrews has got a bit of explaining to do, otherwise people will quite rightly say he's playing the race card."
Victoria Police in 2007 spread false information:
But worst was the reaction of Victoria Police, led by a typical Labor-appointed dead-beat, Christine Nixon.  Nixon claimed Andrews was wrong about
Sudanese crime rates: “They’re not, in a sense, represented more than the proportion of them in the population.” A police multicultural liaison officer agreed and backed the lie; “There’s an under-representation of the Sudanese in crime stats.” 
Those police claims were false. Figures let slip by Nixon the following year revealed crime rates for Sudanese youth at least four times the state average.
Labor smeared Andrews:
“It has been a long time since I have heard such a pure form of racism out of the mouth of any Australian politician,” sneered another Labor deadshit, Queensland premier Anna Bligh.
The Leftist media vilified Andrews, rather than the Immigration Ministers who had originally put Australians in danger - Vanstone and Ruddock:
The Age newspaper accused Andrews of making “unpleasant and inflammatory” comments to provoke “a predictably base reaction from those sensitive to immigration on racial grounds”.  Disgusting !
Yet even in 2007, as journalist, Andrew Bolt, wrote at the time, the evidence was urgent and compelling that a grave mistake had been made.
Of course many Sudanese will make excellent contributions to this country. Of course, and of course and of course. But it's also clear that a worrying number of Sudanese immigrants - coming from their very different culture and a much poorer country with much lower standards of education - are struggling to make their way here and to integrate. 
Recent signs of that include a huge brawl, worries by Sudanese parents about their uncontrolable children dropping out, concerns by teachers of a lack of " life skills", vicious assaults, and police warnings of gang violence.
A state school principal has also told me how very hard she's found it to integrate the African students in her school, given how few of them have any English or much respect for authority. What makes her challenge worse, she says, is that she has so many of them, leading then naturally to form a "gang" rather than be forced to assimilate. 
We can ignore all this, as we usually, do and shout "racist" at those who point out that we have a problem. But we need to rethink just how - or even whether - we resettle immigrants whose culture is so very, very different.
Even Sudanese defenders of the Sudanese refugees back then were actually admitting that we were admitting people more likely to resort to violence:
On 3AW, a Sudanese community spokeswoman asks for understanding: The implication of this journey (as a refugee) could make people prone to be violent.
Er, OK.
And even then, in 2007, the media should have realised our refugee and immigration program - which had already let in hard-to-assimilate Lebanese Muslims - had exposed us to yet another completely needless danger:
A SUDANESE refugee who embarked on a three-day rape spree and sliced an elderly woman's throat a month after reaching Australia will serve at least the next 17 years in jail. A shame they don't deport him back to his Godless country.
Hakeem Hakeem, 21, was yesterday sentenced to 24 years' jail, with a non-parole period of 17 years, for a string of depraved sexual attacks in Melbourne's southeast in March 2005. 
The Supreme Court heard that, just one month after arriving in Australia, Hakeem set out on a drug and alcohol-fuelled campaign of terror on the streets of Dandenong. I wrote a posting entited: ''The Sounds of Silence instead of Honesty''  (May 27, 2013) exposing Labor Scumbag, Mark Dreyfus, Attorney-General, as a liar when he painted Dandenong 3 years ago as; ''Our community is a wonderful example to others of a modern, diverse and harmonious society.'' All the while his city was going to hell in a handbasket: worse now! 
What have we done? Why don't we learn?
And a word from Vanstone and Ruddock on how they got the Sudanese intake so horribly wrong would be useful.
The Way I See It........there is no excuse for their behavior for the majority of these kids, their parents fled their country for a chance to bring these kids up in a peaceful environment. Now these kids do not respect their parents or the laws of Australia, maybe (hopefully) Peter Dutton will start sending the rotten apples back, then they will realize how lucky they were to live in a peaceful country. It does not matter what color,creed or religious persuasion. We are all (or should be) human beings. The Victorian Politicians and  Police need to pull their heads out of the sand otherwise it will get a whole lot worse before it gets better.