Thursday, February 9, 2017

South Australia Loses Power in Another Wind Farm Failure !









South Australia's wind farms fail again, grinding out just 2 per cent power when the wind's die in a heatwave. The Forest Gump factor has kicked in:  ''STUPID IS WHAT STUPID DOES !'' 
Result: blackouts to 40,000 homes as the temperature soars above 40 degrees. And lives put in danger by this green madness.
Widespread power blackouts were imposed across Adelaide and parts of South Australia with heatwave conditions forcing authorities to impose load shedding.
About 40,000 properties were without electricity supplies for about 30 minutes because of what SA Power Networks said was a direction by the Australian Energy Market Regulator. 
The temperature was still above 40C when the rolling blackouts began at 6.30pm to conserve supplies as residents sought relief with air conditioners...
SA Power Networks said in a tweet tonight: “AEMO has instructed us to commence 100MW rotational #load shedding via Govt agreed list due to lack of
available generation supply in SA.’’
The interconnector bringing most coal-fired backup from Victoria was working flat-out at the time. South Australia simply did not have enough electricity generation of its own.
Once again it is important to recognise five things.
  1. 1)  South Australia has the country's most expensive and yet most unreliable electricity because it has scrapped its coal-fired power and relies instead on wind power for 40 per cent of its electricity.

  2. 2)  Expensive and unreliable power costs South Australia jobs, and risks lives as the poor and old cannot afford - or get - cooling in a heat wave or warmth in a cold snap.

  3. 3)  South Australia cannot rely for long on backup from Victoria, which has its own renewable energy targets gthat have already helped to force the announced closure of the giant Hazelwood coal-fired generator, responsible for up to 20 per cent of Victoria's power.

  4. 4)  What we're seeing in South Australia will spread to the whole country if Labor is elected federally and imposes its own renewable target of 50 per cent by 2030. This will force us to use triple the wind, solar and hydro power we do now (but without adding any more dams) at an estimated cost of $48 billion. Our electricity will become as unreliable as that of a Third World state. Or South Australia. Same difference.

  5. 5)  And none of this pain - the expense, the lost jobs, the risk to health - will make the slightest measurable difference to global warming. The whole point of switching to green power is to cut the emissions that is blamed for causing the world to warm. But the cuts we make in Australia by building wind farms are too tiny to make any difference that any scientist can measure. It is all pain, no gain.
The Way I See It......Madness! This global warming policy is a deliberate policy to make us poor.When are people going to WAKE UP and refuse to sanction their politicians going along with this Hoax?

Monday, February 6, 2017

CLIMATEGATE 2: Heating Data Exaggerated by NOAA !


Another Climategate? Now a whistleblower says the world’s leading source of climate data  exaggerated global warming to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change. 
The NOAA allegedly fiddled data to falsely claim there was no ''pause'' or ''slowdown'' in global warming since 1998!  Bloody fraudsters ! 

David Rose of the Mail wrote last week:
A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015. 
The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers. 
But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.It was never subjected to NOAA’s  rigorous internal evaluation process, which Dr Bates devised.   
In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates (photo right) accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data – the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) – of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation… in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’. 
Dr Bates was one of two Principal Scientists at NCEI, based in Asheville, North Carolina. Official delegations from America, Britain and the EU were strongly influenced by the flawed NOAA study as they hammered out the Paris Agreement – and committed advanced nations to sweeping reductions in their use of fossil fuel and to spending £80 billion every year on new, climate-related aid projects...
NOAA’s 2015 ‘Pausebuster’ paper was based on two new temperature sets of data – one containing measurements of temperatures at the planet’s surface on land, the other at the surface of the seas. 
Both datasets were flawed. This newspaper has learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming. The revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend. 
The land temperature dataset used by the study was afflicted by devastating bugs in its software that rendered its findings ‘unstable’... A final, approved version has still not been issued. 
The sea dataset used by Thomas Karl  (photo left) and his colleagues – known as Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperatures version 4, or ERSSTv4, tripled the warming trend over the sea during the years 2000 to 2014 from just 0.036C per decade – as stated in version 3 – to 0.099C per decade. 
Individual measurements in some parts of the globe had increased by about 0.1C and this resulted in the dramatic increase of the overall global trend published by the Pausebuster paper. But Dr Bates said this increase in temperatures was achieved by dubious means. Its key error was an upwards ‘adjustment’ of readings from fixed and floating buoys, which are generally reliable, to bring them into line with readings from a much more doubtful source – water taken in by ships. This, Dr Bates explained, has long been known to be questionable: ships are themselves sources of heat, readings will vary from ship to ship, and the depth of water intake will vary according to how heavily a ship is laden – so affecting temperature readings. 
Dr Bates said: ‘They had good data from buoys. And they threw it out and “corrected” it by using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to agree with bad, but that’s what they did – so as to make it look as if the sea was warmer.’ 
ERSSTv4 ‘adjusted’ buoy readings up by 0.12C. It also ignored data from satellites that measure the temperature of the lower atmosphere, which are also considered reliable. 
NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data. After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.
The Way I See It......there is too much money and pride invested in the global warming scare for us to trust the institutions promoting it. But the dud predictions alone should warn you that many of the "experts" are guilty of gross exaggerations, to say the very least.

Friday, January 20, 2017

A TRUMP VICTORY MAY HAVE BEEN MORE IMPORTANT THAN WE FIRST THOUGHT......

............as the CIA's Islamisation of the White House was well underway !

Californian journalist, Michael Hastings, was working on a story about CIA Director John Brennan’s conversion to Islam and another CIA operative who had converted to Islam, Andrew Warren. The journalist died in a suspicious fiery auto accident in California in June 2013, just three months after Obama had appointed Brennan as CIA Director.
Obama had wanted to appoint Brennan as CIA Director way back in 2009, but there was Congressional opposition to his nomination. The actual reasons for that opposition remain unclear as none of the interrogators pinpointed or even queried his reported close relationship with Islam.
Now I am far from a conspiracy theorist but at least 48 people have died suspiciously during the Clintons' rule and many of those had claimed to be exposers of White House Islamic connections. It makes ex KGB Putin's activities look boy scoutish.
Six more high profile anti-Clinton activists have met suspicious deaths that have not been investigated.
Although Brennan has denied the charges heatedly and repeatedly when they first surfaced early in 2014, Brennan has now admitted and apologised for CIA Agency employees having spied on a Congressional Intelligence Committee set up to investigate torture during the Bush years. The CIA had "improperly accessed" computers used to catalogue the committee's investigation. 
In a statement that followed the revelations, Sen. Udall among many others, declared, "I have no choice but to call for the resignation of CIA Director John Brennan." The calls were ignored by Obama.
You don’t need to be a member of Mensa to conclude that Obama, if not a Muslim himself, was extremely sympathetic to Muslims and would not tolerate any criticism of Islam, despite Islam forecasting the demise of democracy and declaring the eventual destruction of the West and Israel through jihadism.
It was also concerning that Obama installed a new fence around the White House recently and after closer inspection many people aren't too happy with it's peculiar design. All changes or improvements must go directly through Obama's Office so there's no denying he knew exactly what was taking place only steps away from America's iconic White House. They made sure to add in one not so subtle feature that has many Americans calling for it to be taken down.
One patriotic photographer made sure to snap a pic (above) of the new design built into the fence that surrounds the White House. Included in the revamped fence are what appear to be small Islamic minarets like the ones from the Ottoman Empire. This type of classic Islamic architecture is commonplace in countries like Turkey and Saudi Arabia, but lining the fence of the White House in Washington, DC, they do offend and indicate where Obama's allegiances lie.
We all know the Obama crew and the UN would love to see Israel pushed into the Mediterranean Sea, as Muslims promise they will do, and the Obama/Kerry nuclear deal with Iran has made that more than likely unless Israel alone takes out the Iranian nuclear facilities which will plunge the Middle East into a full on war, with Obama from his golf club rooting for everyone bar the Israelis. 
At the National Security Council and at the CIA, Brennan has, like Obama, forbidden the use of the term “jihadist” to describe Islamic terrorists. Obama has refused to mention the word “terrorism” and “Islam” in the same sentence, preferring to use ridiculous descriptions like, “workplace violence” or “merely a lone wolf” and on each occasion ignoring the murderers’ Arabic screams of “Allahu Akbar”.


There is ample evidence to suggest that CIA Director Brennan had not only converted to Islam, but had embraced the worst of all Islamic sects, Saudi Arabia’s extreme form known as Wahhabism, Obama's preferred sect and the cult that bore Osama bin Laden and Afghanistan’s student-inspired Taliban. 
The Saudis also run the world-wide $3 trillion scam of halal  accreditation. 
When Brennan was sworn in to head the CIA and refused to take the oath on the bible (above) the allegations of his conversion to Islam began to gain momentum.
Peter Baker and Mark Mazzetti wrote in the normally (small l) liberal New York Times that, ... in the 67 years since the CIA was founded, few presidents have had as close a bond with their intelligence chief as Obama has forged with Mr Brennan. It is a relationship that has shaped the policy and politics of the debate over the nation’s war with terrorist organisationsas well as the Agency’s own struggle to balance security and liberty.”
After assuming Office the Obama Administration collected lists of Muslim candidates to fill positions in the White House and to head various Agencies, according to previously unseen emails sent to the manager of Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign, John Podesta. The emails were released by Wikileaks.  
                              Obama and Podesta (2nd from right) on Air Force One
Podesta was also a former Chief of Staff for President Bill Clinton. (Here is the actual email, the names on what appear to be comprehensive lists of eligible Muslims available for Administration jobs are not yet disclosed.)
"From: Bansal, Preeta Democrat (NYC) Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 11:01 PM To:Froman, Michael B Cc: 'Onek, Matthew' 
"Subject: Asian American Candidates, Muslim American Candidates Here are the compiled lists of Asian American and Muslim American candidates for top Administration jobs, sub-cabinet jobs, and outside boards/agencies/policy committees. A couple things to note about the list of Muslim American candidates: 
1) In the candidates for top jobs, I excluded those with some Arab American background but who are not Muslim (e.g., George Mitchell). Many Lebanese Americans, for example, are Christian. In the last list (of outside boards/commissions), most who are listed appear to be Muslim American, except that a handful (where noted) may be Arab American but of uncertain religion (esp. Christian). 
"2) There is only one candidate I thought was a viable one for a Secretary-level job among the Muslim Americans. That said, on both lists, there are some very senior people listed in the last category (for outside boards/commissions) who conceivably could be considered for top jobs. The very senior people I put on the last list tended not to be terribly involved in politics or policy, or in the case of some Asian Americans, had already served in the Clinton and even Carter Administrations and so I thought we should seek new talent. 
"But there's no magic to some of the placements. I think the lists are fairly exhaustive, but some of the people may be moved to other categories. 
3) High-profile Muslim Americans tend to be the subject of a fair amount of blogger criticism, and so the individuals on this list would need to be ESPECIALLY carefully vetted. I suspect some of the people I list would not survive such a vet -- but I do personally know, at least in part, virtually all of the candidates in the 1st two categories (but I know very few of those listed for outside boards/commissions). 
4) I listed the elected Muslim American democratic officials at the end of the second category, but for various reasons, I didn't think any of them would necessarily be suitable for an Administration appointment. Nevertheless, I wanted to flag them for you in case you wanted to evaluate them further. DOJ list will be coming in the next two days. Judges and US Attorneys will still take about 10 days. Let me know if the latter are needed sooner."
This is clear evidence that Obama was deliberately including Muslims and excluding Christians from senior Administration positions. 
Obama’s Islamisation of his Administration and the White House was evident from day one. It’s worth noting that although the Democrats deny Julian Assange’s credibility, they have never denied the veracity of any released email.
An interesting caller to the New York radio station “Ground Zero”, who refused to be identified, said this on September 18, 2014: “All 19 9/11 hijackers? Where did they get their visas stamped before they came to this country to launch 9/11? They got their visas stamped at the CIA station in Jeda. And the second in command said, ‘No way, absolutely we are not going to stamp those visas.’ And the fellow who was in charge at the time, his name was John Brennan, he was the person who overrode that instruction and ordered the visas be stamped right there in Jeda.”  ...The rest is history
Brennan is the highest-ranking U.S. official ever to have visited the Islamic holy city of Mecca during the Haaj, a privilege reserved only for serious Muslim pilgrims or special guests of the Saudi King.
A few weeks before the Senate voted to confirm Brennan as CIA director in 2013, former FBI agent John Guandolo revealed that Brennan had indeed converted to Wahhabist Islam while he was CIA Station Chief in Riyadh.
Brennan has shuttled frequently between his home in Virginia to Jerusalem, and Riyadh to coordinate the arms transfers and other logistical support to ISIS and the rebels in Syria and Iraq. Witnesses in Syria, claim to have seen CIA and Israeli Mossad commandos transferring weapons to ISIS and affiliated forces at US request/direction.
Obama may have described ISIS fighters as a “Junior Varsity” team but appears to have done his best to promote them to the NFL. 
No fewer than 80 different groups of rebels were/are still fighting in Syria including many ISIS, Al Queda, Khorasan and Muslim Brotherhood affiliates, all intent on taking out Assad and grabbing more than their fair share of the booty from the vacuum, despite Assad’s massive Russian support. 
[Both Turkey and Russia are at odds with the US by supporting the Assad regime and ostensibly killing ISIS fighters but NATO member Turkey is only interested in killing the stateless Kurds and Russia the jihadist Syrian rebels. But as a result of Putin's efforts alone ISIS is now on the run.] 

Obama claimed that he only ordered “moderate” Muslims be armed in the fight to unseat al-Assad, such was his determination to add the democratically elected Assad to the list of regime changes that has so far caused a million deaths and four million displaced Muslims now, or soon to be, resident in Europe and north America where many are free to plot further terrorist attacks on innocent civilians.
The U.S. House of Representatives finally made a bold move against Obama’s plan to allow thousands of Syrian Islamic refugees into America. The plan was for in excess of 100,000.
Another Obama term in Office might possibly have seen Islamic rule from the White House, a move Obama has said he would support if it came down to a choice. A Trump election victory may have been more important than first thought. 

It’s also worth noting that neither the Saudis nor any other peninsula State has any interest in housing the Europe-bound refugees but rather they have agreed to shelter dozens of the worst jihadists Obama has released from the off-shore Guantanamo facility...many of these high-end prisoners (above) are known to have already returned to the battle field.
Brennan was to the CIA what Hoover was to the FBI... both knew too much to be dismissed, but every last vestige of Brennan's Islamised CIA will be vanquished by Trump. 
         It's now clear why Trump does not trust Obama's Islamised Intelligence Community.
The Way I See It........it's funny but these Left Western leaders who promote the rise and rise of Islam never seem to be at risk of death by terrorists themselves, only the people they have sworn to protect are at risk.
There must be a special place in hell reserved for Merkel and Obama,... and certainly John Brennan.

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

A Legacy ???........What a Shameful Legacy Barack !!


You know there’s something wrong when a new world order communist, an avowed egalitarian socialist and UN-infatuated global warmist like Obama takes a kerosene spewing Boeing 747 to his golf games. What’s wrong is that Barack Obama is in the same mould as our Julia Gillard when it comes to leaving office gracefully with a pocket full of ill-gotten cash after planting dozens of land mines for the incoming government.
This black President is accusing Putin of debasing his glorious (read inglorious) legacy by hacking the Democrats’ emails during the election. Well, it may have been Moscow or possibly Cuba, or any  IT-competent eighth grader who disclosed emails about candidate Clinton. Possible only because it was her illegal email server, tucked away in her laundry somewhere, that was fair game for anyone with an interest in dirty politics. 
Every country hacks other countries’ servers... it’s too easy. Even China hacks our emails and somehow got hold of the new ASIO building’s blueprints that detailed critical wiring. The walls had to be removed and rewired as a result.
Feigned shock by the Democrats that the Ruskies actually hacked a rogue Clinton server is more an attempt to de-legitimise Trump’s election win. They will now continue that process hoping to gain miles of lost ground in the 2018 mid-term elections. But I suspect Trump will be further ahead by then because successful businessmen are far smarter than undemocratic politicians who lock themselves in their own private windowless dungeons. And don’t forget that Islam is violently opposed to democracy.
Most interesting was that the Democrats did not contest or deny the accuracy of any email. Many of them resigned on the basis that the emails were indeed genuine. A hacker certainly did not “meddle” in the election, that's an impossibility. Whoever it was, merely observed both Parties’ emails, but the Democrats’ emails proved far more entertaining. Anyway, Assange declared it was not the Russians who supplied WikiLeaks with the Podesta and Clinton emails... not that Assange can be trusted with the truth. Who knows and really, who cares? 
“Interfering in the election”, says Obama? What a load of frog shit, as was proved by the Greens’ recounts that actually showed it was Hillary Clinton who had unfairly accumulated too many votes, not Trump.
The Democrats want to imply that Trump’s election was engineered by the Russians, and therefore illegitimate. But even the dishonest Democrats privately admit it is a ridiculous proposition. But the White House can be charged with far more than hacking emails... It is guilty of changing foreign regimes, and what a mess they have made of those! 
The interesting addendum to Obama’s endless list of disasters is that it was he, yes Obama, who did much more than hack a foreign nation’s emails. He used US taxpayers’ funds to skew the democratic Egyptian general election in favour of his terrorist friends, the Muslim Brotherhood and its leader, Mohammed Morsi! (above)
Mr Morsi won that election but he barely had time to change the curtains in one of Cairo’s three Presidential palaces, before he was swept from Office and arrested, much to the chagrin of Obama’s White House. Nonetheless, Obama tried to mitigate this devastating loss by employing an army of his beloved and now footloose Muslim Brethren in Washington DC.
Obama’s more recent attempt at a foreign regime change was the use of millions more in taxpayers’ funds in an attempt to unseat the Right wing Netanyahu and fill the Knesset with Left wing Islamic terrorist sympathisers along with supporters of the Palestinians’ terrorist arm, Hamas, an organisation that also insists on the complete eradication of the Jewish State.
Obama also ensured Iran a path to nuclear weapons aimed at Tel Aviv. 
And Obama has the temerity to accuse the Russians of merely hacking emails which, even Obama would have to agree, had bugger all to do with the election result!  
Those who found it hard to believe that Obama’s true affection lay deep in Muslim terrorism and a hatred for Israel, should now be convinced after he supported the Palestinians over loyal US ally, Israel, in a UN resolution he was historically relied upon to veto. He didn't.
That shouldn’t be too much of a surprise, after all he did say that, "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”  And the winds have now shifted in an ugly direction for Obama, with the help of aberrant Islamic UN member nations who have been joined by a despicable New Zealand, ahead of Russia's and Iraq's imminent destruction of ISIS headquarters, al Raqqa.
Obama’s true ambitions have become crystal clear now that he is being discarded to history with the reputation of the worst, most unpatriotic and pro Islamic President ever. He is on a hiding to nothing over the next three weeks and his real colour is in sharp focus at last. 
Trump will not be able to unwind that despicable United Nations resolution but he may be able to unwind the corrupt UN organisation itself. There is a good chance he might wander over to East 42nd Street, New York, during his lunch break and declare the UN building a doss house refuge for New York’s homeless, you know, those people the socialists Obama and Clinton never gave a damned fig about.
It won’t be all that difficult to dismantle the UN as the multitude of Islamic African and Middle Eastern nations that infect the premises never cough up their dues leaving US taxpayers to cover almost a quarter of the $8 billion in yearly running costs of the East Side brothel. 
The Way I See It.......Trump can defund it and withdraw from Permanent Security Council Membership to be followed shortly thereafter by France, and maybe even the UK, rendering the whole organisation defunct and leaving only Russia and China to play with each others’ dongers while the new Secretary General appoints even more observers to view the atrocities in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other hot spots. “Repeal and replace”, as the Don likes to say.
He would also be repealing (but not replacing) the UN’s IPCC which has spent a king’s ransom trying to convince the world of global warming, a hoax Australia’s loony Left, many of whom are among Turnbull’s Liberals and still embrace global warming as part of a world wide redistribution of income.
Kevin Rudd would have made a wonderful replacement for the corrupt Ban Ki-Moon.

Is it just me or are there others who sense some big and long overdue changes afoot? 

Thursday, December 29, 2016

Why don't Humans have a Penis Bone? Scientists may now know !


It can be as long as a finger in a monkey. In the walrus, it can be two feet long. But the human male has lost it completely. And researchers are a little stumped.
Known as the baculum to scientists with an interest, the penis bone is a marvel of evolution. It pops up in mammals and primates around the world, but varies so much in terms of length and whether it is present at all, that it is described as the most diverse bone ever to exist.
Prompted by the extraordinary differences in penis bone length found in the animal
kingdom, scientists set out to reconstruct the evolutionary story of the baculum, by tracing its appearance in mammals and primates throughout history.
They found that the penis bone evolved in mammals more than 95 million years ago and was present in the first primates that emerged about 50 million years ago. From that moment on, the baculum became larger in some animals and smaller in others. The stump-tailed macaque, an animal that weighs only 10kg, has an extremely long baculum for its size, with the bone extending for 5cm. The bone is five times the size of the baculum in the collared mangabey, which is a slightly larger monkey.
Kit Opie who led the study at University College London, said that penis bone length was longer in males that engaged in what he called “prolonged intromission.” In plain
English, that means that the act of penetration lasts for more than three minutes, a strategy that helps the male impregnate the female while keeping her away from competing males. The penis bone, which attaches at the tip of the penis rather than the base, provides structural support for male animals that engage in prolonged intromission.
In chimps, the penis bone is no longer than a human fingernail. The tininess of the bone correlates with the very short spell that the male spends mating, in the order of seven seconds. In chimpanzee groups, females mate with all the males, in what appears to be a strategy to reduce the risk of her children being killed by older males. “It gives each male an idea that they may have fathered the subsequent offspring, and it is in her interests to get that done quickly,” Opie said.
Humans may have lost their penis bones when monogamy emerged as the dominant reproductive strategy during the time of Homo erectus about 1.9 million years ago, the scientists believe. In monogamous relationships, the male does not need to spend a long time penetrating the female, because she is not likely to be leapt upon by other amorous males. That, at least, is the theory.
“We think that is when the human baculum would have disappeared because the mating system changed at that point,” Opie said. “This may have been the final nail in the coffin for the already diminished baculum, which was then lost in ancestral humans.” Details of the research are published in Proceedings of the Royal Society.
The Way I See It......with the reduced competition for mates, you are less likely to need a baculum, Despite what we might want to think, we are actually one of the species that comes in below the three minute cut-off where these things come in handy. I'm sure most wives can verify this fact.

Time to Trump the Climate Hysteria !


The Clexit Coalition has pledged to assist any government or politician seeking to exit the Paris Agreement and to curb the wasteful and destructive UN/IPCC.
The Secretary of Clexit (Climate Exit Coalition), Mr Viv Forbes (photo left) of Australia, said that Clexit could call on over 190 well-qualified climate realists from 26 countries to provide scientific, business, legal and political support and advice.
 See: http://clexit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/clexit-members.pdf
Clexit sees four main priorities:
Firstly, de-fang the Paris Climate Treaty by refusing to sign it, by ignoring any deals signed by others without a supporting referendum, or by giving notice of formal withdrawal.
The Paris Treaty is now a Toothless Tiger
Secondly, de-fund the global warming industry – no tax payer funding for the UN/IPCC, no government money for climate tourism or conferences, no government grants for climate propaganda posing as “research”, no tax exemptions for green “charities” and no government subsidies for green energy.
Thirdly, de-staff all government climate bureaucracies.
And fourthly, re-educate – ensure that the climate curriculum in schools and universities is based on good science and real evidence, and not political agenda.
These four actions - de-fang, de-fund, de-staff and re-educate will cool the climate hysteria, with huge and immediate benefits for tax payers, jobs, industries and energy costs and security. It will also end the doomsday horror stories terrifying our young people. And if there is additional carbon dioxide in the air, our Earth will be greener and produce more food.
Trump is likely to Slash and Burn the Obama Climate policy:
 http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=c920274f2a364603849bbb505&id=0b5620ebdc&e=816c21f57a
The same sceptical questions are being asked in France, Poland, Hungary, UK, Canada, Russia and Germany; even at the Climate Carnival in Marrakesh, Morocco: http://clexit.net/2016/11/17/marrakech-papers-by-clexit-members/
The Way I See it......Brexit and the Trump revolution are just the start. Have a listen to what happened in Australian Parliamentary offices recently:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwQ6BiqeBcg&feature=youtu.be
 (Both Senator Roberts of Australia and Tim Ball of Canada are Founding Members of Clexit).

CARRIE FISHER didn't Love that Famous STAR WARS Gold Bikini as Much as You did !


As the world continues to try and wrap its head around the fact that we lost Carrie Fisher, a plethora of memories spring to the forefront, ranging from her iconic roles, her contributions to TV and film, her feminist pride, and, of course, her famous Star Wars attire.
Aside from her Princess Leia buns, Fisher’s character brought another style trademark to pop culture when she donned the ever-so-famous gold “slave” bikini in Return of the Jedi.
While many became big fans of the outfit (Ross Gellar wasn’t the only one), and some even channeled their inner Princess Leia for Halloween, the truth of the matter is Fisher didn’t really care for the get-up as much as everyone else did.
The actress told People in 1983, that the “slave Leia” costume wasn’t exactly the most comfortable thing she’s put on, explaining that, “I started checking for any bounce or slip after takes,” adding, “It was, ‘CUT. Hey, how they doin’? The hooters in place?'”
She was also unapologetic about her annoyance with having to constantly be mindful of her body positioning because she didn’t want to have any unflattering angles (#thestruggle).
Fisher once told NPR in an interview, that her scene, “was like, ‘Where am I in all of this?’ … I have to stay with the slug with the big tongue! Nearly naked, which is not a style choice for me. … It wasn’t my choice. When [director George Lucas] showed me the outfit, I thought he was kidding and it made me very nervous. I had to sit very straight because I couldn’t have lines on my sides, like little creases. No creases were allowed, so I had to sit very, very rigid straight.”
There was a payoff, though.
“What redeems it is I get to kill him, which was so enjoyable,” Fisher added. “I sawed his neck off with that chain that I killed him with. I really relished that because I hated wearing that outfit and sitting there rigid straight, and I couldn’t wait to kill him.”
Aside from the discomfort and posture-control, there was a deeper distaste for her ensemble, which stemmed from feeling belittled to a hot bod in a nearly naked outfit. And that’s something she made sure Star Wars actress Daisy Ridley would not tolerate.
You should fight for your outfit,” she reportedly told the star. “Don’t be a slave like I was.”
Despite the rough relationship with her onscreen wardrobe, Fisher still poked fun at the whole thing in her book Wishful Drinking, where she stated that when the time comes, she hopes her obituary would read, “I drowned in moonlight, strangled by my own bra.”
Fisher passed away on Tuesday after she suffered a heart attack on a flight from London to Los Angeles. She was 60 years old.
Speaking on behalf of her daughter Billie Lourd, the family’s spokesman Simon Halls announced the news. “It is with a very deep sadness that Billie Lourd confirms that her beloved mother Carrie Fisher passed away at 8:55 this morning,” he told E! News in a statement. “She was loved by the world and she will be missed profoundly. Our entire family thanks you for your thoughts and prayers.”
While several celebrities and fans have taken to Twitter to mourn the late actress, some of Carrie’s fans in Hollywood found the PERFECT way to honor the 60-year-old.
After a beloved celeb passes, people in the Los Angeles area quite often flock to the artist’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame to pay tribute — but unfortunately, Miz Fisher does NOT have one!
Well, since there are PLENTY of people who love Billie Lourd‘s mom, fans decided to make their OWN star from one of the many blank ones near Grauman’s Chinese Theatre! SO SMART.
One Instagram user took to the picture sharing site to show off the star he made for the Star Wars icon as he posted:
YASSS! What’s MORE amazing, is just a couple hours later, another fan took a snap of the same pop up memorial and it already had a TON of love:
While both of Carrie’s parents, Debbie Reynolds and Eddie Fisher, each have a star on the Walk, we’re sure the late actress will get hers sooner rather than later.
There were also several fans who gathered outside of Grauman’s near where some of the Star Wars characters’ hand and footprints are located in order to pay tribute — though Fisher’s are not included.
We still can’t believe Miz Fisher and now her Mom is gone from a stroke while making funeral arrangements and our hearts go out to all of those affected by this tragic loss. The ladies were last seen together at the 2015 Screen Actors Guild award night.
The Way I See It.......the toughness Carrie showed playing Princess Leia was carried with her through her lifetime. The stress of failed marriages, alcohol and drug abuse always had her come up fighting. She didn't fear death.
“No,” Fisher told the Rolling Stone in an interview posted a month ago, when asked if she feared death. “I fear dying. Anything with pain associated with it, I don’t like. I’ve been there for a couple of people when they were dying; it didn’t look like fun. But if I was gonna do it, I’d want someone like me around. And I will be there!”
Fisher had joked about her future obituary in her 2008 memoir Wishful Drinking and the quote was widely circulated on social media after her death.
The actress said Star Wars creator George Lucas told her she could not wear a bra as Leia because “there’s no underwear in space” and that when one became weightless there, their bra would not expand with their body, so the garment would strangle them.

“Now I think that this would make for a fantastic obit—so I tell my younger friends that no matter how I go, I want it reported that I drowned in moonlight, strangled by my own bra,” Fisher wrote.