Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Not Buddhists or Hindus or Christians but....

Muslims!! The state of Victoria has vowed to end the gang crisis gripping Melbourne's northern suburbs after another wild street shootout. Armed "Lebo" thugs defied police and traded gunfire from speeding cars. It was the sixth shooting incident since February suspected of being linked to friction between warring Middle Eastern families. How did we import such trouble? What is the origin of this particular them-against-us-culture? I agree that Culture counts, but again and again we seem reluctant to confront the truth that....multiculturalism sucks. Just ask the leaders of European countries that are sick of the non-assimilation and tribalism of these people..

This reality is confirmed by our Department of Education with figures that confirms few Arabic-language students are making their way into high-performance schools. "There is a significant problem of underachievement," says Dr Rosemary Suliman, senior lecturer at the University of Western Sydney. She argues that perceptions count for much. "Arabic-speaking people do not enjoy a very high status in our society and that has a very negative effect on students. It makes them have a very strong ethic identity, a refusal to be part of the whole and an opposition to other groups and that contributes to their lack of achievement."

The blame is implicitly cast not on Arabic culture but the Australian one, the great punching bag of the Leftist idealogue. We intolerant Australians do not give "a very high status" to Arabic-speaking people, so they retreat into a defensive them-against-us ethnic identity. Yet isn't the reverse more likely, that a them-against-us culture and "refusal to be part of the whole", along with low achievement, is what shapes public perceptions? Isn't that the more likely cause-and-effect, particularly when Chinese immigrants, every bit as "foreign" and likely to be denied "high status" in an allegedly xenophobic society, actually manage to achieve so very well? Dr Suliman pushes far too much blame on our "Anglo" culture.

It doesn't seem to strike this academic elitist with sufficient force that there is in fact some good reason for suspicion in the first place, particularly given incidents she herself lists:

This has since been followed by several local and global incidents which have added to the intensity of the situation, eg. September 11, the Invasion of Iraq, Taliban atrocities in the name of Allah, Gang rapes, shootings and Terrorist attacks and not one Muslim cleric calling for an end to jihad and terrorist attacks, etc.

The Way I See It....this attitude is perfectly reasonable, given the terrorism, gang rapes, shootings and hate-preachings of far too many Muslim spokesman that non-Muslims would be worried...and question their right to be in our country? And aren't those incidents expressive of a them-against-us culture that may be the origin of the tension, not a consequence of it? Note, after all, that this is a problem in most every society in which Muslims are the minority, from Nigeria to Holland, Stockholm to Detroit.

And, indeed, what is deplored as a stereotype is in fact accepted as a sad truth by many Lebanese immigrants themselves. A report by Noble, Poynting & Tabar (1999) stated that Lebanese youth have negative images of themselves and perceive that they are troublemakers, stating that although about 45% are good, the rest are mainly on the dole and serial ratbags. Our immigration Department has a lot to answer for.

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

There Goes the Neighbourhood !

English police have been accused of "covering up" a campaign of abuse, threats and violence aimed at "Islamicising" an area of London. The East London area has been given attention in the media in recent times due to a minority of residents referring to the as an Islamic Republic. The claims come as four Muslims of the Tower Hamlets area were jailed for at least 19 years for attacking a local white teacher who gave religious studies lessons to Muslim girls.

The Sunday Telegraph has uncovered more than a dozen other cases in the Tower Hamlets where both Muslims and non-Muslims have been threatened or beaten for behavior deemed to breach fundamentalist "Islamic norms", i.e. unveiled women and homosexuals.

Teachers in several local schools have told the newspaper that they feel under pressure from Muslim extremist-scum to enforce the compulsory wearing of the veil for Muslim girls. One teacher was forced to quit his job for complaining that Muslim pupils were engaging in racist and anti-Semitic bullying and boasting that they supported terrorism.

The area's gay community has become a particular target of these extremists. Homophobic crimes in the borough have risen by 80% since 2007/8 and by 21% over the past year. Last a mob of 30 young Muslim deadshits stormed a local gay pub, George and the Dragon, beating and abusing patrons. Out on the streets they have also been attacked and harassed by the local Muslims. It's up to Prime Minister David Cameron to apply his own words..."to assimilate or leave!"

NOW IN AUSTRALIA: Yesterday Australians worried about Islam in their country, over the burka, and the growing THEM vs US tribalism of some of the Muslims.

A Muslim woman sentenced to 6 months jail for making a deliberately false statement that a racist policeman tried to forcibly remove her burka to identify her has been freed on appeal. A police car video showed no such thing, but showed the police officer remained courteous while getting harangued by this burka-bitch as he tried to get her to use the breathalyser.

Judge Clive Jeffreys said he was not satisfied it was Carnita Matthews, a 47 year old from Woodbine, NSW, who accused the police of racism because the person who handed in the complaint to police was wearing a burka at the time. Obviously to prove her identity Mrs Matthews would have been required to lift her burka at the police station which is what started the uproar in the first place.

More than a dozen Muslim supporters linked arms and began chanting that stupid "Allah Uh Ahkbar" as they stormed out of Downing Centre Court in Sydney with Mrs Matthews concealed behind them. (See Film Below) Tempers soon rose and these low-life scum began jostling with police after several members of the group began attacking TV cameramen. The burka-bitch's Australian ass-kissing lawyer, Stephen Hopper defended them, saying: "They are obviously happy with the result and are expressing it in a way that is culturally appropriate to them." Can you believe this condescending idiot?

The Way I See It....plenty of people will kindly explain that you just need to become more tolerant, but does that mean we should become deaf and blind to this sort of Muslim crap??

I did not know that taking in immigrants, including refugees, required us to accept "culturally appropriate" ways of expressing pleasure that involved fighting police and attacking cameramen and journalists. If this obligation had been explained up-front years ago, I rather suspect Australians as well as the over-burdened English, would have voted to SLAM SHUT THE DOOR and keep this pond-scum out in the beginning!

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Warming Gives Us MORE Reefs !

The notion that warming seas were bad for corals always seemed implausible to me, especially since I know that coral reefs have been around for at least 440,000 years and survived through the most hot and cold conditions the earth experienced. Yet our local scaremongers kept pushing the line that global warming would kill Australia's Great Barrier Reef.

This gigantic underwater edifice extends over 2000 kilometres along the coast of Queensland. It is the world's largest coral reef ecosystem consisting of more than 3000 individual reef structures many of which have become islands that support more than 200 species of birds. The amount of fish species is just staggering to comprehend.

Never once consulting Australia's own top FOUR climate scientists, Bob Carter, David Evans, Stewart Franks and William Kininmonth, about their anti-warmist stance, Julia Gillard has her climate-advisor, Will Steffen, warning us that nothing short of securing an effective global agreement to tackle climate change can save the reef. He quotes one of the world's leading reef scientists, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, saying that Australia will be left with "a great weedy reef" unless the world cuts emissions. Another scientist went even further, Professor Terry Hughes, from a nest of warmists at James Cook University, said nations needed to cut carbon emissions to 90% by 2050 to save the reef. That's right, everybody gets to live in the Middle Ages just to keep the weeds out of the reef. Unrealistic dumb bastards!

Hoegh-Guldberg's past predictions make me doubt his latest. In the 1998, he warned that the reef was under pressure from global warming and much of it had turned white. He later admitted the reef had made a "surprising" recovery. In 1999, he claimed global warming would cause mass bleaching of the reef from 2010 onwards. Last week he hadn't. In 2006, he warned high temperatures meant "between 30-40% of coral on the Great Barrier Reef could die within a month." He later admitted this dying had a "minimal impact."

And now the latest research from Japan, from its National Institute for Environmental Studies and published in Geophysical Research Letters. shows that warmer seas indeed help reefs, not hurt them: Rising temperatures caused by climatic warming will cause a poleward range shift and/or expansions in species distribution. We found the first large-scale evidence of poleward range expansion of corals based on 80 years of national records in many areas around Japan, where century-long measurements of in situ sea-surface temperatures have shown significant rises of coral growth. Four major coral species, including two key species for reef formation in tropical areas, showed poleward range expansions, whereas no species demonstrated any range shrinkage or local extinction. The speed of these expansions reached up to 14 km/year, which is far greater than that for other species.

The Way I See It....the corals that make up reefs around the world have endured warm and cold periods with many large rises and lowerings of seas levels over millions of years. Bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef is one more change that occurs when a huge amount of fresh water runs off the land but it's temporary and within 3 weeks the polyps return when the saltwater density equalises. Marine biologists know this but are prepared to support the warmist agenda.

I have personally heard it myself from marine biology students. It's a ongoing joke that if you want a government grant to pay for your field work, you simply write into your grant proposal that you want to see what global warming is doing to...the reef, the fish, the coral polyps, the islands eco-system or the water's PH. comes a nice chunk-of-change! I have checked on a number of James Cook's finest marine scientists and found that $100,000+ a year is not unheard of...year in and year out. And all the while they are corrupting the next generation of marine scientists to defraud the government grants system by pushing the threat of terrible climate change. What a racket! Ruins !

This week marks a year since Julia Gillard became Prime Minister after getting the elected Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd sacked. Never mind in May last year Gillard insisted Labor would definitely not replace Rudd: "There's more chance of me becoming the full-forward of the Dogs Football Club." Just a month later a shocked Rudd was packing up his office. Australians were shocked too by this betrayal.

It was in that very instant of her greatest triumph that Gillard began to destroy herself and first made promises that have crippled her and has left the Labor Party in ruins. A News Poll today shows the ALP's primary vote has plummeted to a historical low of 27 per cent. The lowest figure for any government in 40 years! Amazingly, six in ten voters said they would prefer Mr Rudd as leader again.

It's Shakespearean, how this feminist hero became the hapless joke we saw on 60 Minutes on Sunday, giggling awkwardly outside her boyfriend's shed as she meekly obeyed his ban on women entering. That cringing scene hinted at the real tragedy behind Gillard's fall. It's not just that she's been the most incompetent and weak prime minister since at least World War ll, but there's not been a single achievement to boast of in a junkyard of failure.

More devastating is that she's flunked the moral test. Gillard has failed, above all, because of her lack of character. Her continually unfulfilled broken promises such as stopping asylum-seeker boats by having an East Timor Centre, having a Citizen's Assembly on Climate Change, and stating emphatically before the election that she would not install a Carbon Dioxide Tax. Nor did Sydneysiders get their rail link or the rest of us never saw the Cash for Clunkers scheme materialise. It was policy on-the-fly to give the impression she and her government were doing something. The ban on live cattle exports showed again the knee-jerk policy making without even consulting the cabinet or the Indonesians. Now we have her presiding over the greatest gamble of public money ($40 billion) in generations with the National Broadband Network.

The Way I See It....she knew from the start of her reign that her hands were dirtied by deceit and double-dealing. Nothing could be more important to her survival and self-respect than to regain the public's trust in her word and conviction. No more trickery, political spin and false promises. The onus was on Gillard to play it straight last year...but can a political animal ever change it's "spots"? Incredibly, the past 12 months have been a shameful record of deceits that defines Julia today and I feel makes her unelectable with or without the radical Greens Party.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

If Your Humped, You'll Get Bumped (Off) !

With the planet threatening to turn into a ball of fire, it's a relief to find the Australian government may have a solution. KILL THE CAMELS !

YES...shoot the buggers! From the SUV, from a helicopter. Exterminate...exterminate!

As you many of you know, Australia has had herds of camels roaming the Outback, left to be free after serving as supply carriers across the inland deserts to resupply the many isolated stations (ranches) over a hundred years ago. Being free to do what camels do, they have naturally bred up to many times their original numbers. But only now have they been revealed as a menace to the planet.

In a serious proposal, the Department of Climate Change has released a finding by the Northwest Carbon Company noting these cud-chewers BURP clouds of Methane. "Methane is a potent greenhouse gas," it warns us.

They go on to say that these camel burps are baking the planet....seriously! And so, under this proposal, we must shoot the camels to save ourselves. It's plans like this that make me wonder who the planet is actually being saved for. Certainly not for the camel.

The Way I See It....nobody has calculated whether the gain is worth the camels' pain? So I had a look at this detailed proposal to discover by how much the world's temperature would fall if we wiped out our camels. Strangely, that figure is missing. Indeed, it's always missing. And don't get me started on those stupid vegetarians that want to also annihilate the cattle and sheep in this country as well.

The Government never tells you by how much its global warming schemes--even its $11 billion a year carbon dioxide tax--will cut the expected temperature. Is it embarrassment that stops it from saying? After all, the real answer is virtually ZERO. Or is it just a symptom of mass delusion, in which no one stops to ask why are we doing all this? I think there are some people in government that need a good Bitch-Slapping to snap them out of it!

Monday, June 13, 2011

Are Contrails really CHEM-Trails ?

Contrails...those parallel white lines emitted from airplanes streaking across the sky. They are a rare sight in many parts of the world but over the past year Americans have noticed more and more of these obvious trails extending from horizon to horizon. Some days, my relatives tell me, they are so thick and in such an obvious pattern they are convinced something is going on. A serious idea put forward is that GEOENGINEERING is being conducted to prevent global warming. I wouldn't put it past the Eco-Fascists to try something like this. Already, Tim Flannery, Australia's own warmist fanatic floated a similar idea but he wanted sulphric acid sprayed in the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight. Crazy!

How? By reflecting more of the sun's heat into outer space using artificial clouds. If they are using a mixture of barium and nano-sized aluminium to make the cloud mixture, as many are now saying, we are in serious trouble. The Council on Foreign Relations posted a series of papers on its website hailing the benefits of Geoengineering. In these papers, environmental scientists, "warmist" climatologists and rabid political scientists discussed the urgency for such a project. While they did not admit that such a program was presently active but they did suggest that the public needed to be told some very frightening stories of doom to force the program into reality.

Biologists in Hawaii and several states in the continental United States have recorded rising aluminium levels in soil samples, as well as in lakes and various plants. These levels are of considerable concern, because if these massive amounts of aluminum are being sprayed into the atmosphere, we will see a dramatic rise in a number of diseases, including pulmonary diseases, asthma and neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases. Nanosized aluminum is considerably more inflammatory and destructive to the brain as it poisons vital cell functions and is linked to Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Because aluminium has been shown to produce significant brain inflammation, it can disrupt early brain development. Children exposed to aluminum during their first 5 years will be at risk. It's bad enough that parents still get their children inoculated with aluminium containing vaccines. Also it promotes bronchiospasm which damages the lining of the lungs. People with asthma and chronic pulmonary diseases are at the greatest risk from airborne aluminium.

The Way I See It....spraying the atmosphere with thousands of tons on nanosized aluminium particles everyday with the hope that this would decrease global warming in any significant way, especially when there hasn't been any real warming in the last 10 years, is morally irresponsible. What they will get is an increase in many diseases, because plants would concentrate the aluminium in leaves and fruits, our food would become incredibly contaminated. Animals that ate the plants would also be contaminated.

Include the massive amounts of aluminium criminally added to vaccines and America's future that could spread to the rest of the world's is in real jeopardy. We all need to find out if this program is in effect, if it is..we must stop it! I appeal to my many followers to do their own investigating and get back to me with their findings. Let's keep the sky Watermelon Proof!