WOW!... SO THERE WAS RUSSIAN COLLUSION AFTER ALL !

Yep, a whole trilogy of Russian collusion! Between the Democrats, along with Obama’s Administration and the media.

Russian collusion net has still missed the Don but it seems to have caught the netmaker. The Dems, who chose Russia as the false conspiratorial culprit only because they were aware of how it all worked and it was they, the Dems, who were into it right up to and over their scrawny necks.

The so-called Russian dossier, paid for by the Hillary Clinton camp to the tune of 12 million dollars was designed to dissuade voters from voting for Trump. 

This dodgy dossier, which is full of wild unfounded accusations states that, during a trip to the Moscow Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Trump had hired hookers to perform ‘golden showers’ (urination on him and each other)... and on the Presidential suite bed the Obamas had previously slept in.

This “evidence” was meant to imply that Russian intelligence had taped this “golden shower” performance and that it was one of several forms of “kompromat” (that's Russian for compromising material) they had on Trump that they could and would use as a political lever if ever he (Trump) became President.

           It is likely that Michael Flynn will be rehired after Democrats are arrested 

Unfortunately this false dossier was used as evidence to secure a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant targeting Trump and his campaign (in particular his National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn).

Surveillance on Flynn, which never should have been allowed as it was based entirely on this bogus dossier, was used to catch him out on a lie about a meeting with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak... a meeting that was completely normal and innocuous. 

But Flynn was duly fired anyway for “lying” to an FBI that was more complicit in illegality than Flynn ever was.

Trump had accused the DNC of wire-tapping his Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign. The media including CNN and the DNC had laughed at the proposition all over their leads and tweets for days, but it now appears to have been true.

Deputy FBI Head Andrew McCabe has already resigned with full retirement emoluments

Is this sounding a little like Watergate? Well it’s a thousand times more serious than any Watergate break-in.

To knowingly submit false evidence to a Court in order to acquire a wire-tap warrant to eavesdrop on a political opponent during a Presidential campaign is third world stuff that usually ends in summary executions.

And a serious number of heads, at least 11, must roll after this "memo" dust settles.

Even more serious is the fact that the Obama Administration’s Agencies of the DoJ, FBI and possibly, but not conclusively, the unacountable CIA, were used to try to kill Trump’s hopes of winning the White House.

     
Former FBI Head, James Comey (above) did the DoJ's bidding in protecting Hillary Clinton  from prosecution over her illegal email server.

I can’t imagine a more serious crime other than hiring a hitman to blow Trump's brains out! But these are the Clintons we are dealing with here and it’s likely that that option was seriously considered.

I have spent time in researching the infamous “Washington Post” and “New York Times” and there is no better place that the local watering hole to find out WTF is going on. 

Why didn’t the Washington Post’s young Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein (above) display the same investigative skills in disclosing this current caper as they did with Watergate? 

Well, Nixon who faced and dodged impeachment by resigning, was a Republican! You see, even back then the Press detested Conservatives. They were fair game, as is Trump.

The Way I See It.......those same aging Woodward and Bernstein characters spend most of their time on CNN defending an indefensible Hillary Clinton while widely lambasting Trump.

After all, when you look into it, conservative media (and even cartoonists) world-wide are rarer than hens’ teeth.    

Be Careful What You Wish For !

In today’s crazy world, western politicians are wasting billions of tax-payer dollars force-feeding costly unreliable green energy in the bizarre belief that this will somehow change Earth’s climate.

Even more incredible, they fear global warmth and seem hell-bent on creating global cooling. They should study climate history. It is snow and ice, cold dry air and carbon dioxide starvation we need to fear, not a warm, moist, fertile, bountiful atmosphere.

 Climate change is natural and unstoppable.

Just 20,000 years ago, Earth was in one of its recurring glacial phases. A thick massive ice sheet smothered Canada, Alaska, Iceland, Greenland, North Asia and Europe as far south as London. Much of the animal and plant life of the previous warm era was extinguished. Even in warmer lands not covered by the ice sheet, plants suffered as the cold oceans removed moisture and carbon dioxide plant food from the atmosphere.

Then, because of changing cycles in Earth’s orbit and tilt, reinforced by changing solar cycles, the sun warmed the frozen lands. The great ice sheets melted, sea levels rose and the warming oceans expelled moisture and CO2 plant food into the atmosphere. Plant life recovered. Tundra, forests, grasslands and herbivores advanced towards the pole and fish became abundant in the shallow seas that flooded coastal plains. Hunters, herders, farmers and fishermen followed the food.

Human population increased greatly. They gave thanks for the warmth, and worshipped the sun.

 But the peak of the modern warm era is past, and the natural cycles controlling global temperatures are pointing downwards.

 The Way I See It.....only an idiot with a death wish for life on Earth would attempt to accelerate our inevitable descent into the next ice age.

 Luckily, their costly war on warmth is totally futile, but their war on carbon energy will prove tragically misguided in the cold times ahead.

PROFESSOR CHARGED FOR DOUBTING WARMING ALARMISTS !!

PROFESSOR Peter Ridd is just the latest academic to be punished for challenging the great global warming scare.

Oops. I shouldn’t even have mentioned that James Cook University has ordered Ridd to stop attacking the science behind dodgy claims that global warming is killing the Great Barrier Reef.

You see, JCU insists its dirty work be kept secret. It charged Ridd even for telling his own wife it was trying to censor him, after trawling through his emails for dirt.

What kind of people run this university? They sound to me less like academics than commissars of some Third World tyranny.

No scientific debate today is more important to us than that on the theory that our emissions are warming the world dangerously.

After all, this global warming theory has panicked governments into spending billions of dollars.

They’ve already destroyed a coal-fired electricity system that once gave us cheap and reliable power, even though green power makes no measurable difference to world temperatures.

They’ve spent billions on other green schemes, even though temperatures have risen far less than predicted.

They’ve built desalination plants for Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide — all now mothballed — because they feared a “permanent” drought that never came.

And they’ve thrown our cash at Pacific islands to save them from rising seas, even though more than 80 per cent of those islands have actually grown in size or been stable.

So surely we should question the science behind all this?

Isn’t this how Western civilisation has advanced — by testing beliefs?

Instead, universities have a shameful record of stifling this debate.

Example: the late professor Bob Carter was one of the first scientists anywhere to note that global warming had, in fact, paused — and it stayed paused for most of this century.

Any university should be proud to have an academic who was first to a truth. Instead, Carter lost his position as professor emeritus at JCU, which claimed it was merely cutting costs.

Then there’s world-renowned Professor Bjorn Lomborg, who proved that most schemes to fight global warming cost a fortune without actually cutting temperatures.

For that heresy, academics and students at two universities — Flinders and the University of Western Australia — banned him from setting up his fully funded Copenhagen Consensus Centre in Australia.

And now there’s Peter Ridd.

A Green sea turtle at Lady Elliot Island, part of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

Ridd is a professor of physics and attached to JCU’s Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, and he has long warned that much scientific research is not properly checked.

“I have published numerous scientific papers showing that much of the ‘science’ claiming damage to the (Great Barrier Reef) is either plain wrong or greatly exaggerated,” he said last week.

“As just one example, coral growth rates that have supposedly collapsed along the reef have, if anything, increased slightly … and mass bleaching events along the reef that supposedly serve as evidence of permanent human-caused devastation are almost certainly completely natural.”

He says the reef is actually “in excellent condition”, and largely regrows after bleaching or cyclones.

Professor Peter Ridd says the Great Barrier Reef is actually “in excellent condition”

“Some parts of the southern reef, for example, have seen a tripling of coral in six years after they were devastated by a particularly severe cyclone.”

Ridd may be right or wrong. Either way, this is a critical debate, yet JCU is trying to shut it down.

It pounced after Ridd last year went on Sky News to outline his arguments, adding: “We can no longer trust the scientific organisations like the Australian Institute of Marine Science, even things like the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies.”

JCU found him guilty of “serious misconduct” and of lacking “collegiality” — meaning “groupthink”.

It has further accused him of denigrating the university and a colleague, and of breaching confidentiality.

Beautiful Underwater photography of a Green Turtle

Some of those alleged breaches were nothing more than Ridd telling his own wife that the university was punishing him. He is now fighting in the Federal Court to defend his academic freedom.

This has so far cost him $95,000 in legal fees, but thank heavens many Australians still think free speech is worth defending.

Ridd’s go-fund-me appeal raised the money in just two days.

But this case is not only about free speech. It is also about whether scientific debates are settled by censorship or by debate.

A mainstay of Western civilisation is on trial here. So why hasn’t federal Education Minister Simon Birmingham stepped in?

Why has Chief Scientist Alan Finkel not protested against this muzzling of a scientist? Where are the other academics defending their most sacred traditions?

The Way I See It.......It doesn't take a genius to see that marine scientists have a vested interest in keeping their snouts in the Warming Subsidies trough thereby stifling scientific inquiry that doesn't support the dogma they have established !!

FBI Agents Terrified: Congressional Examination Of Files May Be Undoing Of Mueller’s Witch Hunt !

Mueller witch hunt in hot water as heavy rumors swirl that the highest officials of the FBI and State Department were on the Clinton Foundation payroll.

For nearly a year, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been conducting an inquisition-like witch hunt into non-existent collusion between President Trump and Russia. With a pair of Mueller’s investigators outed as members of an extensive Hillary Clinton FBI “fan club,” the “treasonous acts” Peter Strzok and Lisa Page committed have fellow Hillary biased agents terrified. After months of piling up evidential firewood to burn President Trump at the stake with, they just found out Congress will actually get to take a look over their shoulders at all of it.

The thing that has them really twisted up is that most of what they found points at the Clintons. How many more agents and DOJ lawyers are similarly guilty of treason? Covering up for Hillary, as the one colluding with Russians and conspiring to rig the election is a no-no. So far, all the evidence points to Uranium One and pay-for-play schemes at the State Department. Worse, there are heavy rumors that the highest officials of the FBI and State Department were on the Clinton Foundation payroll.

In the Summer leading up to the 2016 election, James Comey got handed the hot potato of announcing the decision on the Clinton email server investigation. It appears that even though the FBI had uncovered evidence of misconduct that qualified as “gross negligence” which is a crime, the wording of the report was downgraded by Peter Strzok to “extreme carelessness,” which is not a crime. Hillary did nothing wrong Comey claimed.

Comey was given the honor after Attorney General Loretta Lynch got busted having a secret meeting with Bill Clinton on an Arizona runway and recused herself from the case. Then, in a bizarre reversal just before the election, Comey waffled and said the investigation was back open again. The reason? Hillary emails, that Huma Abedin was not supposed to have, ended up on her husband’s laptop. The same laptop that “Carlos Danger” used to pick up an underage girl.

Mueller’s investigators outed as members of an extensive Hillary Clinton FBI “fan club.”

On Jan. 11 the Justice Department turned over the first batch of records demanded by Devin Nunes on behalf of two government oversight watchdog committees. Both the House Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee subpoenaed the records last August. The DOJ initially lied and said they didn’t exist but were caught red-handed when Rod Rosenstein admitted to them in a recent congressional hearing.

Instead of making copies of the sensitive materials, access was provided in a secure location to over 1.2 million documents. The records include not only reports and summaries of interviews conducted by Mueller’s investigators, they date back to the 2016 investigation into Hillary Clinton’s secret email server. Even more documents are expected to be produced “in the coming days.”

One of Capitol Hill’s many moles scampered off with a copy of the letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and his deputy Rod Rosenstein, listing the documents requested. The list seems to “dovetail with areas that the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, is investigating, such as the handling of the Clinton probe.” According to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) “We want the information that Horowitz has.” He also mentioned interrogation sessions “are being arranged with seven FBI and Justice Department officials, as well as others.”

In a last-ditch effort to thwart the committees which properly provide supervision over the Justice Department, they showed up on Paul Ryan’s doorstep to cry on his shoulder. What he told them amounted to “suck it up, guys. bite the bullet and turn it over.” Ryan would have loved to have told them there was some magic legal spell that could be used to make the records disappear but this time, there isn’t one. What a Congressional oversight committee asks for, they get.

The only semi-legitimate excuses they can give for hiding information from Congress is that “forms identifying FBI informants” would be handed over. If that happened, they say they might “withhold sensitive information from future reports.” The FBI isn’t afraid the safety of these people will be put at stake by identification, they are afraid Congress will learn the truth. In order to hide things from their bosses in the future, they just won’t write them down.

Another source claims that if informants know they may be caught leaking classified intelligence by ratting to the FBI as a “confidential informant” they won’t be opening up as easily as they have in the past.

According to a former senior agent, “the credibility of the FBI is on the line.” All eyes are now on Director Christopher Wray, who assumed control last August. Everyone is watching to see “how assertive the director will be in defending them and other career officials and whether he’ll refuse to hand over documents that might compromise covert sources and operations.”

Director Wray hasn’t publicly responded to President Trump’s suggestion of treason but in the past, he “repeatedly defended the integrity and professionalism of the FBI workforce in speeches and congressional testimony.”

The Way I See It......James Rybicki, FBI Chief of Staff, is the next one scheduled for an intense grilling. The hot lights and blow-torch will be warmed up for a closed-door session on Thursday by both of the house committees.

WE NEED TO GET MORE AUSSIE WOMEN PREGNANT !

…or foster more foreign babies !

The baby boom of the sixties saw women on average bearing 3.5 babies but now that figure has dropped to an appalling 1.4 babies. Australia needs 2.2 babies from every fertile woman or it will devolve into a third world economy.

The world average is 2.7 with Islamic countries leading the way with over 4 babies per multiple female and well ahead of Italy, Greece, Japan and Germany at around 1.2 births per fertile woman.

Paid parental leave and childcare largesse is not convincing women that pollination is the source of all life. 

The increase in preferred gay life styles and homosexual men who lack an interest in females is a serious problem and we normal blokes will be arrested for showing a healthy interest in the opposite sex.

If we are ever to recover from this lack of fertility we will need to address the onslaught on normal heterosexual men having a normal healthy predilection for yummy sheilas. It’s hard to pollinate a woman if you are not allowed to touch her, perve on her or even send her a suggestive text without being accused of sexual harassment.

We humans are one of the few species who can actually engage in sex without it being a bothersome conduit for procreation. So there are plenty of horny blokes around ready to risk impregnation compared to women who prefer to stay unpregnant and married to their employment status for decades into middle age.

Women dress to the nines hoping to get lucky but only lucky in sex itself… the thought of pregnancy is horrific and they will do anything to avoid it. That’s a shame but it’s a movement that is not diminishing so we must find ways to reverse it.

The modern woman is happy to bed as many blokes as possible without getting pregnant before the age of 35. She is then left with a few tenuously short years to make up the numbers.

Popular Canadian author and free-speech advocate Mark Steyn (above) says Western societies are a dying demographic. “Low birth rates have put Western societies like Australia into a demographic death spiral.''

“Australia is below replacement level and without a sociological pivot that death spiral will continue”, Steyn warns.

So what do we do? We can’t compete with Muslim blokes who all seem to be on disability pensions with plenty of time for pollinating all of their four wives. And of course Australia’s safety net is there to catch them all. While we Aussie blokes have to pretend to be dedicated pillow biters or we get arrested.

There was a bloke who, each evening at Flinders Street station, asked every one of 10 thousand women who were going home if they would like a shag. He was asked by a bystander if he got a lot of knockbacks. “Bloody hell yeah”, he said, “but I get a lot of shags ‘tho.”

Is it a numbers game after all? No, and it shouldn’t be. But isn’t asking a sheila out to dinner much the same thing? And if she lets you kiss her goodnight will she allow you grab her bum? Or does the fact you even try indicate you are guilty of sexual harassment? Bloody hell, things have changed, and I cannot see how it’s for the better with gay marriage now the “in” thing.

The feminist Left is more engaged in late term abortions than nurturing a healthy baby.

The Way I See It........those two lumps on a woman’s chest are not just a cleavaged excuse for a fashion statement, they were designed solely to feed babies. 

The choice still remains… have more Aussie babies or be run over by Islamic ones.

The 7th of December 2017 - the Day Australia Lost its Soul !

…is marriage equality really about equality?

In the eyes and minds of many Australians, the 7th of December 2017 should become known as the day Australia lost an essential part of its unique character and perspective on life - its fair go and egalitarian attitude towards all. It is also the day from which many Australians will recognise that politicians have no regard for the majority of hard working people living and working and paying taxes in this country. 

After watching the unashamed display put on by politicians in parliament house on that day, there is little doubt that apart from the YES lobby and their misguided supporters, many Australians witnessed blatant arrogance and insensitive exuberance displayed towards the rest of the country. Only 4 out of 150 politicians (2.6%) revealed the courage and the deference to support the 40% of voters who voted NO.

[Thought: With so many local councils wanting to remove Australia day from the 26th of January, it might be appropriate to start referring to the 7th of December as unAustralia day?]

Once the so-called debate on SSM / equality was over and Australia's charlatan politicians jubilantly amended the marriage laws, many YES devotees celebrated their ‘win’ in the belief that waves of euphoric love would spread across the country transforming it into a paradise kingdom of joy and harmony and unbridled enlightenment.

Unfortunately and sadly, there were YES supporters who secretly would have preferred to be NO supporters and either assumed the outcome would be an inevitable YES or did not want to face the pressures of the political correction brigade. Either way, they voted YES so they could be seen to support the ideals of equal rights and get back to their lives without further unwanted interruption.

The remaining YES supporters believed they were endorsing the progressive ideal of establishing the same rights for all Australians. Mantras of equality for all; equal marriage; same sex marriage were mindlessly repeated in blissful ignorance of having been used in a classic Machiavellian move. Such high ideals appealed to many voters and were so effective in their influence that the outcome of the postal survey was decided in the first week, well before the debate commenced. At the very least, the majority of the 60% who selected YES naively believed that equity and fairness were the prime motivations for giving their support.

Regardless of the reasons 60% chose YES, their wishful thinking will not last long as more and more Australians realise that the opposite is not only to be the new reality, but the reality that was intended all along. In place of a kingdom of glorious love and equality for all, the citizens of Australia will gradually recognise the need to defend themselves against a deluge of coercive moves and underhanded tactics driven by a single goal - to impose acquiescence to the eventual collapse of western culture as we have known it. 

The mantras were simply a euphoric distraction and it is now the time to punish the regressive 40%.

Behind the scenes sat an unforeseen coalition of groups that were not prominent during the survey and silently allowed the popular notion of ‘equality for all’ to spearhead the preordained result. All the while these groups harboured another, far more malicious, destructive, and longstanding agenda in readiness for an expected clear-cut YES result.

There are many labels and actions that apply to such groups. Some include: leftists, socialists, marxists, communists, Labor, Greens, Fabians, liberalists, anti-facists / anti-racists / anti-bullies, safe schools, feminists, and political correction / thought police. The list goes on. Together they constitute a broad coalition of left-leaning groups and individuals known as the Left Unity. All are founded on communist ideals and actively promote the acceptance of socialism for Australia.

Officially, such groups include: Australian Greens; Australian Labor Party; Communist Party of Australia (Marxist–Leninist - also established and financed the Search Foundation); Getup (supports and promotes Labor and Greens' agenda); Socialist Alliance (the university student network); Socialist Alternative; Socialist Equality Party; Socialist Party; Solidarity; and Workers' Liberty Australia. Again the list goes on. The Communist Party maintains a "Roadmap to the Left" that lists political parties, organisations, and media outlets committed to developing a "comprehensive alternative to neo-liberal capitalism". Regardless of their labels, or who the individuals are, or the groups they are affiliated with, all share a common mindset: socialism or more accurately, a neo-Marxist / cultural Marxist doctrine.

Tracing back through the history of leftist thinking to determine the roots of cultural Marxism is not a simple task. Even learned experts do not agree on what gave rise to the ideals and agendas of the current doctrine. In reading through the mountain of articles available online, the only consistent pattern that emerges is the backgrounds and biases of the authors. That is, their position on the political spectrum determines whether cultural Marxism is accepted as valid (a right wing claim) or a fabrication / right wing conspiracy (a left wing claim). The left denies the existence of cultural Marxism, the right see it as the root of all evils in the Western world.

                                                          50 shades of gay

Several names and organisations stand out over the course of the decades since the Communist Revolution: Marx of course, Antonio Gramsci (Italian Marxist – The Prison Notebooks and Cultural hegemony), Georg Lukács (cultural terrorism), Felix Weil (funded a new Marxist Institute for Social Research, which later became the Frankfurt School), Columbia University (published works on Critical Theory), Theodor Adorno (Frankfurt School - redefined views on gender roles and sexual mores as prejudice), Max Horkheimer (Frankfurt School - essay titled Traditional and Critical Theory: Critical Theory), Herbert Marcuse (Frankfurt School - Eros and Civilization), and Rudi Dutschke (the long march through the institutions).

The above names and their key works are briefly listed in case anyone wants to look into each in more detail. The complete list is far longer. The point made here is that a long line of Marxist related thinking culminated in the 1960’s and has continued to influence our lives and events to this day.

The social / cultural revolution of the 1960s rapidly opened the door to a range of liberations: black power, feminism, gay rights, sexual freedom, and the anti-establishment movement. 

These ideals and actions were consistent with the principles that were articulated by the earlier Marxist proponents. Since the 60s, we have witnessed the disturbing effects of multiculturalism, the family court, racial tensions, anti-discrimination laws, political correctness, an inconsistent legal system, media bias, information control, government propaganda and lies, the rewriting of history, the erosion of basic rights and free speech, gender dysphoria and fluidity, and the effects of postmodernism (relative thinking) and its offshoots, Critical Theory, Cultural Studies, Feminist Theory, and Gender Studies.

In all likelihood, none of the Left Unity groups will agree or admit to the existence of cultural Marxism, or the Frankfurt School, or even the broader Marxist influences that have emerged over the past 100 years. Clearly the influences evolved over a long period of time and as yet have not been consolidated into an agreed field of thought or doctrine. Perhaps they simply do not want to. However, in the absence of an outright acknowledgement, it is difficult to establish the exact nature of the Left Unity’s common roots. What is obvious is that all share the ideals of cultural Marxism regardless of whether or not they exist or are officially acknowledged by the individual groups.

                                          The Frankfurt School of Marxism

Although many writers claim the Frankfurt School produced a list of 11 recommendations (an 11 step plan of cultural subversion) for the systematic corruption of western culture, it simply is not possible to directly attribute the list to the school or any of its members. A more plausible explanation is that the list could have been compiled from previous Marxist works.

Therefore, rather than get caught up in proving if the Frankfurt school produced this list, it is more productive to read through the recommendations and ask whether or not examples of each can be confirmed. Then, ask why such a list exists at all - where could it have come from given that present day examples abound for each and every recommendation. 

On completing this exercise, it will be difficult to deny the conclusion that the 11 recommendations neatly summarise how to undermine the foundations of our society and bring about the type of dystopia we now see throughout Australia every day:

1. Establish wide ranging racism offences and hate speech laws.
2. Generate continual change to cause confusion.
3. Introduce sexual propaganda in schools and expose children to pornography to encourage acceptance and desire for homosexualisation.
4. Undermine and remove parental and teachers’ authority.
5. Use immigration to destroy national identity and provoke racial tension.
6. Enable excessive use of alcoholic drink and recreational drugs.
7. Establish sexual deviance as a norm in society.
8. Create an unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime (trauma through injustice).
9. Induce dependency on state benefits.
10. Control and dumb down all media. (Six companies now control 96 percent of the world’s media).
11. Breakdown the family unit.

As mentioned, members of the Frankfurt School did publish works on Critical Theory. The basic principles have now evolved into a field of study known by the same seemingly innocuous title that instructs students on the destructive criticism of Western culture. The education system has become the vehicle to gradually erode Christian values and morality and instil in students a mindset of continual criticism of all aspects of Western culture over time. In essence, Critical Theory is another strategy for undermining and eventually destroying Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethno-centrism, and conservatism. Critical Theory is underscored by a deep seated belief in the pervasiveness of Western evils: racism, sexism, colonialism, nationalism, homophobia, fascism, xenophobia, imperialism, white supremacy, and religious bigotry (applied only to Christianity).

In addition to a decades long presence of the Socialist Alliance network within Australian Universities, many, if not all universities, particularly the G8 group, cannot be viewed as anything other than leftist. Much of the content, the nature of the subjects, their academics, and the students themselves observe a highly progressive left-wing bias. All teach subjects and courses that cover one or more of the critical theory related topics listed beforehand. This is a form of mind programming that is made even more potent due to the overrepresentation of feminist devotees and feminism studies in universities.

Is anyone still wondering why 60% of voters supported the YES position and why the greater proportion of YES voters was aged less than 30 years? This article has only scratched the surface of how far leftist ideology has taken root within Australia. In light of the outcome of the SSM survey, it is also clear that their influence has spread far wider and deeper than most have imagined. 

This leaves us with one more question to ponder. On the 7th of /December 2017, were the politicians celebrating a win for SSM or the triumph of ‘cultural Marxism’ in Australia?

We Have a Problem with the SUNDANESE #3 ! ( AFRICAN PACK ATTACK )

MELBOURNE:  AUSTRALIA ( AGAIN !! )

Back in April 26, 2011 and again on January 28th, 2014 I posted articles on this Blog entited; We Have a Problem with the Sudanese #1 & #2.  I was outlining the increasing trouble in a number of Australian cities that Sudanese refugees that were causing violence to our citizens and the problems the Victorian police department is facing everyday. Still, not a month goes by without some Sudanese scum breaking the law. Now this:

Hundreds of youths have allegedly bashed and robbed tourists amid a series of wild brawls on St Kilda’s foreshore this morning.

Police struggled to contain the situation as young people of African appearance fought each other and assaulted bystanders early

Thursday morning. It's time to bring back the WHIPPING POST!

Before that was the Moomba riot as well as mass brawls at several Sudanese beauty pageants.

Then there's the extraordinary crime rate:

Police statistics show the Sudanese-born are 128 times more likely than other Victorians to commit violent robberies, and 68 times more likely to commit home invasions.

Ten more recent attacks in and around Melbourne over the past month:

1-3: Three attacks around Springvale Station, one leaving the victim with a broken jaw

4: Violent Noble Park mugging

5: CBD mugging

6 & 7: Two 'similar' violent CBD attacks

8 & 9: Attacks at Southbank

10: An alleged murder

The Way I See It.....the unvarnished truth helps us to understand what we are facing, too. Gert Wilders, in his visit to our country a few months ago told us how his country, the Netherlanders, has had a gutful of benevolent multiculturalism (you know, lots of welfare) and is putting a stop to Muslim immigration and he warns us to take heed. Immigration today too often looks like colonisation. Done badly, the host country is left with unassimilated minorities colonising poor suburbs and turning  them into ghettos.

Plugged into satellite TV, these parasites maintain their culture and language and, fortified by welfare, keep their distance. Add militant Islam, and some suburbs can become the fault line of a culture war, particularly when young men return from fighting in jihadist groups, as hundreds of Australians are now doing in Syria. I am certainly not saying that this is yet a serious problem here in Australia, but then again, what else are Dreyfus, the ABC, and SBS not telling us?

Thankfully, the Federal government usurping the incompetant Victorian government and is making plans to initiate a DEPORTATION ruling were any African bastard over 16 that in in a gang and participates in criminal behavior will sent back o the shit-hole they came from. Preferably from a height of 10,000 meters out of the airplane's door!