WE NEED TO GET MORE AUSSIE WOMEN PREGNANT !

…or foster more foreign babies !

The baby boom of the sixties saw women on average bearing 3.5 babies but now that figure has dropped to an appalling 1.4 babies. Australia needs 2.2 babies from every fertile woman or it will devolve into a third world economy.

The world average is 2.7 with Islamic countries leading the way with over 4 babies per multiple female and well ahead of Italy, Greece, Japan and Germany at around 1.2 births per fertile woman.

Paid parental leave and childcare largesse is not convincing women that pollination is the source of all life. 

The increase in preferred gay life styles and homosexual men who lack an interest in females is a serious problem and we normal blokes will be arrested for showing a healthy interest in the opposite sex.

If we are ever to recover from this lack of fertility we will need to address the onslaught on normal heterosexual men having a normal healthy predilection for yummy sheilas. It’s hard to pollinate a woman if you are not allowed to touch her, perve on her or even send her a suggestive text without being accused of sexual harassment.

We humans are one of the few species who can actually engage in sex without it being a bothersome conduit for procreation. So there are plenty of horny blokes around ready to risk impregnation compared to women who prefer to stay unpregnant and married to their employment status for decades into middle age.

Women dress to the nines hoping to get lucky but only lucky in sex itself… the thought of pregnancy is horrific and they will do anything to avoid it. That’s a shame but it’s a movement that is not diminishing so we must find ways to reverse it.

The modern woman is happy to bed as many blokes as possible without getting pregnant before the age of 35. She is then left with a few tenuously short years to make up the numbers.

Popular Canadian author and free-speech advocate Mark Steyn (above) says Western societies are a dying demographic. “Low birth rates have put Western societies like Australia into a demographic death spiral.''

“Australia is below replacement level and without a sociological pivot that death spiral will continue”, Steyn warns.

So what do we do? We can’t compete with Muslim blokes who all seem to be on disability pensions with plenty of time for pollinating all of their four wives. And of course Australia’s safety net is there to catch them all. While we Aussie blokes have to pretend to be dedicated pillow biters or we get arrested.

There was a bloke who, each evening at Flinders Street station, asked every one of 10 thousand women who were going home if they would like a shag. He was asked by a bystander if he got a lot of knockbacks. “Bloody hell yeah”, he said, “but I get a lot of shags ‘tho.”

Is it a numbers game after all? No, and it shouldn’t be. But isn’t asking a sheila out to dinner much the same thing? And if she lets you kiss her goodnight will she allow you grab her bum? Or does the fact you even try indicate you are guilty of sexual harassment? Bloody hell, things have changed, and I cannot see how it’s for the better with gay marriage now the “in” thing.

The feminist Left is more engaged in late term abortions than nurturing a healthy baby.

The Way I See It........those two lumps on a woman’s chest are not just a cleavaged excuse for a fashion statement, they were designed solely to feed babies. 

The choice still remains… have more Aussie babies or be run over by Islamic ones.

The 7th of December 2017 - the Day Australia Lost its Soul !

…is marriage equality really about equality?

In the eyes and minds of many Australians, the 7th of December 2017 should become known as the day Australia lost an essential part of its unique character and perspective on life - its fair go and egalitarian attitude towards all. It is also the day from which many Australians will recognise that politicians have no regard for the majority of hard working people living and working and paying taxes in this country. 

After watching the unashamed display put on by politicians in parliament house on that day, there is little doubt that apart from the YES lobby and their misguided supporters, many Australians witnessed blatant arrogance and insensitive exuberance displayed towards the rest of the country. Only 4 out of 150 politicians (2.6%) revealed the courage and the deference to support the 40% of voters who voted NO.

[Thought: With so many local councils wanting to remove Australia day from the 26th of January, it might be appropriate to start referring to the 7th of December as unAustralia day?]

Once the so-called debate on SSM / equality was over and Australia's charlatan politicians jubilantly amended the marriage laws, many YES devotees celebrated their ‘win’ in the belief that waves of euphoric love would spread across the country transforming it into a paradise kingdom of joy and harmony and unbridled enlightenment.

Unfortunately and sadly, there were YES supporters who secretly would have preferred to be NO supporters and either assumed the outcome would be an inevitable YES or did not want to face the pressures of the political correction brigade. Either way, they voted YES so they could be seen to support the ideals of equal rights and get back to their lives without further unwanted interruption.

The remaining YES supporters believed they were endorsing the progressive ideal of establishing the same rights for all Australians. Mantras of equality for all; equal marriage; same sex marriage were mindlessly repeated in blissful ignorance of having been used in a classic Machiavellian move. Such high ideals appealed to many voters and were so effective in their influence that the outcome of the postal survey was decided in the first week, well before the debate commenced. At the very least, the majority of the 60% who selected YES naively believed that equity and fairness were the prime motivations for giving their support.

Regardless of the reasons 60% chose YES, their wishful thinking will not last long as more and more Australians realise that the opposite is not only to be the new reality, but the reality that was intended all along. In place of a kingdom of glorious love and equality for all, the citizens of Australia will gradually recognise the need to defend themselves against a deluge of coercive moves and underhanded tactics driven by a single goal - to impose acquiescence to the eventual collapse of western culture as we have known it. 

The mantras were simply a euphoric distraction and it is now the time to punish the regressive 40%.

Behind the scenes sat an unforeseen coalition of groups that were not prominent during the survey and silently allowed the popular notion of ‘equality for all’ to spearhead the preordained result. All the while these groups harboured another, far more malicious, destructive, and longstanding agenda in readiness for an expected clear-cut YES result.

There are many labels and actions that apply to such groups. Some include: leftists, socialists, marxists, communists, Labor, Greens, Fabians, liberalists, anti-facists / anti-racists / anti-bullies, safe schools, feminists, and political correction / thought police. The list goes on. Together they constitute a broad coalition of left-leaning groups and individuals known as the Left Unity. All are founded on communist ideals and actively promote the acceptance of socialism for Australia.

Officially, such groups include: Australian Greens; Australian Labor Party; Communist Party of Australia (Marxist–Leninist - also established and financed the Search Foundation); Getup (supports and promotes Labor and Greens' agenda); Socialist Alliance (the university student network); Socialist Alternative; Socialist Equality Party; Socialist Party; Solidarity; and Workers' Liberty Australia. Again the list goes on. The Communist Party maintains a "Roadmap to the Left" that lists political parties, organisations, and media outlets committed to developing a "comprehensive alternative to neo-liberal capitalism". Regardless of their labels, or who the individuals are, or the groups they are affiliated with, all share a common mindset: socialism or more accurately, a neo-Marxist / cultural Marxist doctrine.

Tracing back through the history of leftist thinking to determine the roots of cultural Marxism is not a simple task. Even learned experts do not agree on what gave rise to the ideals and agendas of the current doctrine. In reading through the mountain of articles available online, the only consistent pattern that emerges is the backgrounds and biases of the authors. That is, their position on the political spectrum determines whether cultural Marxism is accepted as valid (a right wing claim) or a fabrication / right wing conspiracy (a left wing claim). The left denies the existence of cultural Marxism, the right see it as the root of all evils in the Western world.

                                                          50 shades of gay

Several names and organisations stand out over the course of the decades since the Communist Revolution: Marx of course, Antonio Gramsci (Italian Marxist – The Prison Notebooks and Cultural hegemony), Georg Lukács (cultural terrorism), Felix Weil (funded a new Marxist Institute for Social Research, which later became the Frankfurt School), Columbia University (published works on Critical Theory), Theodor Adorno (Frankfurt School - redefined views on gender roles and sexual mores as prejudice), Max Horkheimer (Frankfurt School - essay titled Traditional and Critical Theory: Critical Theory), Herbert Marcuse (Frankfurt School - Eros and Civilization), and Rudi Dutschke (the long march through the institutions).

The above names and their key works are briefly listed in case anyone wants to look into each in more detail. The complete list is far longer. The point made here is that a long line of Marxist related thinking culminated in the 1960’s and has continued to influence our lives and events to this day.

The social / cultural revolution of the 1960s rapidly opened the door to a range of liberations: black power, feminism, gay rights, sexual freedom, and the anti-establishment movement. 

These ideals and actions were consistent with the principles that were articulated by the earlier Marxist proponents. Since the 60s, we have witnessed the disturbing effects of multiculturalism, the family court, racial tensions, anti-discrimination laws, political correctness, an inconsistent legal system, media bias, information control, government propaganda and lies, the rewriting of history, the erosion of basic rights and free speech, gender dysphoria and fluidity, and the effects of postmodernism (relative thinking) and its offshoots, Critical Theory, Cultural Studies, Feminist Theory, and Gender Studies.

In all likelihood, none of the Left Unity groups will agree or admit to the existence of cultural Marxism, or the Frankfurt School, or even the broader Marxist influences that have emerged over the past 100 years. Clearly the influences evolved over a long period of time and as yet have not been consolidated into an agreed field of thought or doctrine. Perhaps they simply do not want to. However, in the absence of an outright acknowledgement, it is difficult to establish the exact nature of the Left Unity’s common roots. What is obvious is that all share the ideals of cultural Marxism regardless of whether or not they exist or are officially acknowledged by the individual groups.

                                          The Frankfurt School of Marxism

Although many writers claim the Frankfurt School produced a list of 11 recommendations (an 11 step plan of cultural subversion) for the systematic corruption of western culture, it simply is not possible to directly attribute the list to the school or any of its members. A more plausible explanation is that the list could have been compiled from previous Marxist works.

Therefore, rather than get caught up in proving if the Frankfurt school produced this list, it is more productive to read through the recommendations and ask whether or not examples of each can be confirmed. Then, ask why such a list exists at all - where could it have come from given that present day examples abound for each and every recommendation. 

On completing this exercise, it will be difficult to deny the conclusion that the 11 recommendations neatly summarise how to undermine the foundations of our society and bring about the type of dystopia we now see throughout Australia every day:

1. Establish wide ranging racism offences and hate speech laws.
2. Generate continual change to cause confusion.
3. Introduce sexual propaganda in schools and expose children to pornography to encourage acceptance and desire for homosexualisation.
4. Undermine and remove parental and teachers’ authority.
5. Use immigration to destroy national identity and provoke racial tension.
6. Enable excessive use of alcoholic drink and recreational drugs.
7. Establish sexual deviance as a norm in society.
8. Create an unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime (trauma through injustice).
9. Induce dependency on state benefits.
10. Control and dumb down all media. (Six companies now control 96 percent of the world’s media).
11. Breakdown the family unit.

As mentioned, members of the Frankfurt School did publish works on Critical Theory. The basic principles have now evolved into a field of study known by the same seemingly innocuous title that instructs students on the destructive criticism of Western culture. The education system has become the vehicle to gradually erode Christian values and morality and instil in students a mindset of continual criticism of all aspects of Western culture over time. In essence, Critical Theory is another strategy for undermining and eventually destroying Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethno-centrism, and conservatism. Critical Theory is underscored by a deep seated belief in the pervasiveness of Western evils: racism, sexism, colonialism, nationalism, homophobia, fascism, xenophobia, imperialism, white supremacy, and religious bigotry (applied only to Christianity).

In addition to a decades long presence of the Socialist Alliance network within Australian Universities, many, if not all universities, particularly the G8 group, cannot be viewed as anything other than leftist. Much of the content, the nature of the subjects, their academics, and the students themselves observe a highly progressive left-wing bias. All teach subjects and courses that cover one or more of the critical theory related topics listed beforehand. This is a form of mind programming that is made even more potent due to the overrepresentation of feminist devotees and feminism studies in universities.

Is anyone still wondering why 60% of voters supported the YES position and why the greater proportion of YES voters was aged less than 30 years? This article has only scratched the surface of how far leftist ideology has taken root within Australia. In light of the outcome of the SSM survey, it is also clear that their influence has spread far wider and deeper than most have imagined. 

This leaves us with one more question to ponder. On the 7th of /December 2017, were the politicians celebrating a win for SSM or the triumph of ‘cultural Marxism’ in Australia?

We Have a Problem with the SUNDANESE #3 ! ( AFRICAN PACK ATTACK )

MELBOURNE:  AUSTRALIA ( AGAIN !! )

Back in April 26, 2011 and again on January 28th, 2014 I posted articles on this Blog entited; We Have a Problem with the Sudanese #1 & #2.  I was outlining the increasing trouble in a number of Australian cities that Sudanese refugees that were causing violence to our citizens and the problems the Victorian police department is facing everyday. Still, not a month goes by without some Sudanese scum breaking the law. Now this:

Hundreds of youths have allegedly bashed and robbed tourists amid a series of wild brawls on St Kilda’s foreshore this morning.

Police struggled to contain the situation as young people of African appearance fought each other and assaulted bystanders early

Thursday morning. It's time to bring back the WHIPPING POST!

Before that was the Moomba riot as well as mass brawls at several Sudanese beauty pageants.

Then there's the extraordinary crime rate:

Police statistics show the Sudanese-born are 128 times more likely than other Victorians to commit violent robberies, and 68 times more likely to commit home invasions.

Ten more recent attacks in and around Melbourne over the past month:

1-3: Three attacks around Springvale Station, one leaving the victim with a broken jaw

4: Violent Noble Park mugging

5: CBD mugging

6 & 7: Two 'similar' violent CBD attacks

8 & 9: Attacks at Southbank

10: An alleged murder

The Way I See It.....the unvarnished truth helps us to understand what we are facing, too. Gert Wilders, in his visit to our country a few months ago told us how his country, the Netherlanders, has had a gutful of benevolent multiculturalism (you know, lots of welfare) and is putting a stop to Muslim immigration and he warns us to take heed. Immigration today too often looks like colonisation. Done badly, the host country is left with unassimilated minorities colonising poor suburbs and turning  them into ghettos.

Plugged into satellite TV, these parasites maintain their culture and language and, fortified by welfare, keep their distance. Add militant Islam, and some suburbs can become the fault line of a culture war, particularly when young men return from fighting in jihadist groups, as hundreds of Australians are now doing in Syria. I am certainly not saying that this is yet a serious problem here in Australia, but then again, what else are Dreyfus, the ABC, and SBS not telling us?

Thankfully, the Federal government usurping the incompetant Victorian government and is making plans to initiate a DEPORTATION ruling were any African bastard over 16 that in in a gang and participates in criminal behavior will sent back o the shit-hole they came from. Preferably from a height of 10,000 meters out of the airplane's door!

SOMEWHERE OVER THE RAINBOW …we were told a big fat lie !!

Well, it was always going to be the case if we voted YES to a phantom Bill without any content available. Only a deceptive question about “equality” that everyone would have agreed to! “Just trust us”, the rainbow mob implored. “Just pass the Bill and we will sort out your protections later, just trust us." 

Well, we foolishly did trust them and the private Member’s Bill was passed in the Senate… but guess what? It has come back to the House with NO protections … not one single amendment! So now the House must deal with the most unusual and dishonest piece of legislation ever proposed.

Turnbull, who calls himself a Conservative, also lies through his teeth when he says the High Court agrees with the result. Bullshit! The High Court was asked only to rule on the legitimacy of the cost Federally. 

The postal survey was a farce and if held again tomorrow (legitimately) it would be 70/30 the other way. Legitimately would mean there was sufficient time to consider both campaigns BEFORE votes were cast. 

Naturally everyone would vote YES to “equality”, and they did, people are fair… but after the first week neither campaign mattered, the answer was already settled and the rainbow mob knew it.

Now it is a case of them screaming, “just get it done!” so we can all get married before Christmas (sorry I mean, before year end celebrations).

Amendments will now be put forward by the Coalition Members including Abbott. But there may not be the numbers to pass any amendment, so it will go back to the Senate intact, sans the protections the rainbow mob assured us we would have if everyone passed the “equality” Bill.

If amendments don’t pass in the House, as the rainbow mob fully expects, the Bill will be returned to the Senate intact and will be law before Christmas.

If amendments are made they will need Senate approval which will not be forthcoming as the rainbow mob will gamble on the House wanting this done before Christmas. And it does. 

No-one, including Turnbull intends sitting next week, so everyone will be packing their bags, kissing their Canberra shags goodbye, and it will be the conclusion of the greatest legislative scam in history.

So why don’t the rainbow mob want the protections included in the Bill? Let me have a guess… these poor sexually confused people have been copping shit for decades and now it's pay-back time. 

If there is some poor religious bastard who will object to selling gay Valentines' day cards in his news agency, the gays want to target him with a vengeance, notifying TV crews and other media. They want to ensure no-one will ever again object to their gay lifestyles on religious or any other grounds in future.

                                               Sorry, but not on my kids' tree

If protections were in place they would not be able to do that. But don’t expect dumb conservatives to realise what they are up to. They don’t care … CHRISTMAS IS HERE!!!

The Way I See It.......as for Tim Wilson proposing to his mate on the floor of the House to have it recorded in Hansard? “Tim, I like you, when I speak to you you always seem reasonable. But although it may be a lump-in-the-throat, tear-jerky moment for you, it is OUR Parliament and most of us don't have the same homogenous emotions as you have. 

I wouldn’t propose to my straight sheila at a gay/Green convention. Please remember Tim, respect the other 98 per cent of us,

… that’s if you want respect returned.    

SHEILAS SHOULD STOP THE BULLSHIT !!!

Ever wondered why there are more women than men (there always have been)? The reasons are manifold but mainly it is because historically it was only men who went to wars, it was only the men who were killed. 

Men have always had a lower average life expectancy. Women have always lived longer. Females have always been the inferior, unwanted species, boys were what it was all about and that is mainly still the case especially in Asia .

China’s one-child policy has left a population imbalance with a preponderance of boys exchanging Valentine's Day cards. Parents confined to one child could not afford the risk of producing a girl so, with the aid of sex identification at six weeks, it was a simple case of procuring abortions until the foetus proved to be male.

India was a little behind the times so baby girls had their arms and legs broken and were sent out on the street to beg. Asia still relies on its working sons to provide aged parental welfare not provided by governments.

Seraglios (or harems) in the Muslim world contain many wives and concubines (hookers or women of inferior rank) who are all expected to be pregnant most of the time. Harems are not a sexual thing. Historically harems were necessary because armies regularly lost up to half their men in battle and all available uteri had to be utilised upon the army’s return. 

Roman armies planned for decimation. And that was only the loss of one-tenth of an army.

A woman can only produce one child a year, a man can produce thousands.

A soldier was required by law to take his dead brother’s wife no matter how ugly she was. Army generals had the choice of multiple widows… utilising vacant uteri was a rule of the militaries so as to maintain the combat strength of a nation or village, otherwise in a few short years it would be over-run without the protection of men.

Invading armies always took the fertile women back home with them.

Even the Bible says that a man must take his slain brother’s wife and probably not because he has the hots for her. The fact is that throughout history fertile women have been a valuable, economic commodity.

            Captured German women who could no longer give birth to Germans

Okay, I can hear the feminists screaming, “troglodytic misogynist” already! Well, stiff shit girls, that’s the way it has always been in all species, and it will probably take millennia to change humans… other species can never change.

Most male animals use a female’s urine to test their hotness or readiness to mate but it will be a while before blokes in nightclubs sniff out females before curling their top lips to taste those yummy pheromones. No, a bloke will caress her thigh or kiss her neck risking a slapped face. That's a price we're happy to pay.

Some idiot blokes even fight over an available female as a stallion or an elk will do. How stupid is that? As I said, there are more women than blokes so why fight, there will be another one on the next corner.

But all male animal species will fight to the death to retain their hard-won coterie of females who will guarantee the furtherance of the species' welfare .

The females don’t really care who impregnates them as long as it’s the superior winner of a contest. Many females mate with multiple males thereby ensuring those poor males, (who believe the offspring is theirs) are conned into protecting and feeding the young which are most likely not theirs at all. Clever little females!

Lions who have defeated a pride’s old male will kill the cubs so as to stop the lionesses lactating and bring them in season. Most females will not ovulate while lactating. 

Every male of every species believes his genes are superior.

Breeding is all about the attractive of the species and the attractive one is he who the female decides will produce the strongest and best offspring most suited to an abiding environment.

It will be hard for feminists to get their head around this but an attractive Inuit is short and obese, a signal to the female Inuit that this bloke can stay out on the winter ice for longer and bring home more whale and seal meat for her offspring.

An attractive Aboriginal male to a lubra is skinny and tall, with fast-twitch muscles, able to react with speed, resist the sun and run down emus. All cold weather species are fat, all hot weather species are skinny… there are no fat coyotes and very few skinny walruses. 

The best thoroughbred breeding sites in the world are in cold climates because foals invariably put on more weight more quickly.

So the world-wide hysteria over male molestation of women is largely misplaced. Women have always been prepared to trade their wares for progress. But women can’t complain about being touched when they advertise their wonderful wares so prolifically. 

Men can’t keep their hands off a beautiful new Aston Martin …is a woman any different when she dresses up to attract men? I mean if she doesn’t want to be touched then wear a sandwich board and we won’t go near her, but that’s not what she wants, is it?

Yes, the pilloried white male is only doing what comes naturally, two beautiful breasts advertised with an irresistible cleavage, bare legs all the way up to inviting thighs, no more Cottontails… oh no, it’s now a thong sporting a deliciously bare bum and a finely manicured front bum. Red lipstick, rouge and toe and nail polish, the colour of arousal in all species. Topped off with a pheromone laden perfume! WTF are we supposed to do… ignore it all?

If we are NOT beguiled by a woman’s beauty, we are considered offensively rude and asked to explain why.

The Way I See It...........it comes down to signals. And don’t tell me women don’t signal their sexuality. But sometimes we blokes get the signals wrong. The signals might not be for us but might be for a husband or boyfriend and what bloke won’t respect that? But the signals are there for all present ‘tho.

So you sheilas can stop this “respect us” bullshit, that’s easily solved. Just dress up like a butch bird in a bloke’s clothes and it’s guaranteed only another butch sheila will be interested. A bloke will not come near you,

… but that’s not what you really want, is it girls?     

FBI Investigation Finds OATH Against President, Forced Resignations Loom !

Deputy Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI) Director Andrew McCabe  was caught holding a private meeting with top officials at the FBI where he reportedly said “F—k Flynn, and then we f—k Trump.”

McCabe has had several meetings in this fashion and now finds himself in hot water as the Trump appointed FBI Director Christopher Wray (above) begins to isolate agents in order to tear down the deep state corruption.

James Comey, then FBI Director, neglected to look into the meetings McCabe was conducting. McCabe was successful in ousting Michael Flynn, then National Security Advisor, who supported Robin Gritz in a letter after the FBI supervisory agent launched a harassment suit against McCabe.

.

The FBI has been under scrutiny for becoming a corrupt partisan agency after they rigged the investigation into Hillary Clinton. The corruption in the Clinton case was also tied to the Department of Justice when Lorretta Lynch, then attorney general, met with Bill Clinton in a private plane at an

airport. The meeting was supposed to be kept secret, however, after photos captured the two, they told the press the meeting was impromptu and not case related.

The FBI was told during the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign to call the investigation into her private Email server a “matter.” This was to intentionally mislead the American people of Clinton’s serious crimes and legal issues. The FBI would later make a statement calling her actions “extreme carelessness” instead of gross negligence. The two terms are virtually indistinguishable by definition.

Then FBI director James Comey held a press conference on the conclusion of his investigation into Hillary Clinton where he explained he was not recommending prosecution. Comey noted, that although what she did was clearly against the law and provided a serious risk to the American people, he could not prove intent. Intent is not a threshold needed to prosecute on gross negligence however.

Using these semantics, the FBI was able to avoid labeling Clinton’s crimes in the private Email server case which she was clearly guilty. Loretta Lynch only days after meeting with Clinton’s husband announced that the Department of Justice would not be pursuing charges against Hillary Clinton. This was a coordinated effort to relieve a criminal of responsibility so she could continue her campaign for presidency.

At the same time the FBI was colluding with the Department of Justice to advance Hillary Clinton’s career, they were actively attempting to undermine the Trump campaign. The FBI is suspected of using a dossier funded by the Democratic National Committee(DNC) in order to obtain a warrant to wire tap the Trump campaign. The dossier has been revealed as nothing more a fictitious document with no basis in fact.

Bruce Ohr  -----------------Christopher  Steele

The dossier was produced by former British spy, Christopher Steele. Associate Deputy General for the Department of Justice, Bruce Ohr, was demoted after it was revealed that he met with Steele during the 2016 presidential campaign. He also met with the founder of Fusion GPS, who employed Steele to assemble the dossier, after the election.

If that didn’t reek of collusion enough, Ohr’s wife was employed by the firm during the 2016 election campaign. It is unclear how involved she was with creating the dossier on Trump.

Congress has requested information from the FBI and Department of Justice who have mostly been uncooperative and continue to obstruct their investigation into the corruption. It is reported that McCabe is set to resign in the coming weeks as Wray continues to investigate FBI agents.

McCabe (above) is scheduled to testify in front of the House Intelligence Committee before Congress is out of session for Christmas recess. McCabe was supposed to testify Tuesday but the Justice Department said there was a scheduling issue, “The FBI regrets the error, and we look forward to making both witnesses available…” The other witness being Steele’s FBI handler.

The Way I See It......as Christopher Wray’s investigation into the FBI’s top brass continues, many agents are susceptible to demotions, firing and forced retirement. The extent of corruption in the FBI and Department of Justice has led both agencies to suffer credibility issues. Their reluctance to cooperate with Congress has drawn further suspicion. If McCabe retires before he can be subpoenaed, it would serve to obstruct justice.

Stupid ! CANADIAN TEACHERS Forced to Attend ‘LGGBDTTTIQQAAPP’ INCLUSIVENESS TRAINING Session !

Welcome to 2017, where teachers are forced to take an “inclusiveness” training session that helps them accommodate more than FIFTEEN different versions of gay/lesbian students.

TV Presenter, Tucker Carlson brought on a liberal from Canada to help break it down.             

And yes, it’s just as ridiculous as you’d expect.

Tucker (left)  began, “Well, the tolerance police have a lot of power here in America, in case you haven’t noticed, but they’re even stronger in Canada. Just last week Canadian prime minister Justin Trudaeu, just to show he's as much an idiot like his father, Pierre Trudeau, delivered an official apology to gay and transgender Canadians for the past state discrimination against them. But now, teachers in Durham, Ontario, had to attend an inclusiveness training course for the–deep breath here–LGGBDTTTIQQAAPP community, which is apparently a community. That 15-letter acronym, intended to encompass all sexual minorities, may soon be required soon at schools.”

Carlson asked the Canadian liberal to explain this disgusting sell-out.

Here’s what he responded with: “Well, generally shortened to the LGBTQ, which is the community, and there’s a few extra ones they’ve added in there. But, no one goes by that. Maybe that’s to teach kids the alphabet or not, but generally

it’s referred to, the dumbass Prime Minister referred to it yesterday in the House of Commons during his apology as ‘LGBTQ.’ Some people don’t know what it means. They know it means inclusiveness, it’s a good thing. It’s a question of tolerance.”

After hearing this guy speak, it’s more important than ever that we re-elect President Trump in 2020. If liberals are allowed back in power, this sort of BS will be the law of the land, and we CANNOT have that happen!

The Way I See It......before you know it, a Democrat President would certify hundreds of different kinds of gender because of a minority of children who don't have their heads screwed on Straight.....just Queer!