It's That Time Again.....

....when we're asked to switch off our rationale! We are told to be on North Korea time for one hour. This is Earth Hour....but it's 365 days a year for the North Koreans (see photo). The very idea that newspapers around the world are urging people to turn off their 21st century illumination and go back to candlelight, is the single most stupid manifestation of warmist delirium. They have enlisted a list of well-known do-gooders brainwashed in the global warming dogma to build up the planet-saving hype for the big night on Saturday.

Has the Lame-Stream Media actually thought about the central message that their Earth Hour transmits. Now true, the word "thought" does not sit comfortably with the closed-minded warmism mob. But if they did, do they really want to suggest the glorious future they would desperately like to lead us into, which looks a lot like North Korea's glorious present? Where it's less the case that you get to turn off the lights and more that there aren't any to turn on! Or more pointedly, there just ain't any electricity for those 25-watt bulbs.

Is this really the message they want to send? That the ICONIC representation of their so-called Clean Energy future is, well...DARKNESS? When the world-wide media and all their warmist fellow travellers ignore the mounting evidence that the temperatures haven't risen in the last 10 years all the while CO2 went up 120 ppm in that time, and continue their Dalek-like chanting "carbon will be destroyed" you know you are seeing a form of religious ideology. Not Science.

What goes for climate science is now the endless Conga-line battalions of snouts-in-the -trough climate main-chancers, that keep telling us over and over again, we will have all the power we want from wind and solar and a long extension cord from the nearest geothermal site.

So tell me again....why turning off the lights for an hour is so inspirational? Has it to do with the herd instinct, group think or a mob mentality? Paying the most fitting tribute to the inspirational leadership of the late Kim-Jong-Ill for creating in North Korea the living example of taking a country back to the 19th century energy future they desire: that I could understand.

The Way I See it.....is that if you were actually trying to persuade people they could have their carbon-free cake and stay in the 21st century, this does not seem the smart way to go. Particularly, not as you present them both immediately before and after Earth Hour with the, well, alternative.

I most certainly do not mean so-called "alternative energy", but the alternative to their preferred energy sources. Needless to say, the lights that are on before and after Earth Hour won't be solar powered. And if the wind ain't blowing......oh well. Just beautiful. Here's our energy future; DARKNESS. Here's the carbon energy present and future; LIGHTS!

I know at 8:30pm Saturday night I will be keeping my lights, TV, microwave and maybe use the deep-fat frier and as a fitting touch, I'll turn on my Christmas lights that I haven't taken down yet, that are lining my guttering. I hope you join me for the sake of REASON.

The Koran is a Killer!

My Blog posting on Sunday, 28th of March, 2010 was entitled Obama Can't See the Koran is a Killer where I stated that President Obama's praise of Islam is putting America and the world in danger. According to him and other misguided politicians, the Koran promotes peace and tolerance for non-Muslims. This is a dangerous misrepresentation of this inherently violent and undemocratic text. It can be compared to a medieval Mein Kampt (Hitler's murderous blueprint for the world).

Yes...that violence was there again this past week in Afghanistan. It is a perfect example of the sick Islamic psyche that accidentally burning a Koren is more offensive then killing people. It's a sign of how close this country is to renewing its cesspit status once Obama pulls out the troops in two years. Twelve people, including two soldiers, have been already killed in the bloody protests raging across Afghanistan over the inadvertent burning of the Koren at a NATO military base and riot police are on alert for more violence.

div>This covert Muslim U.S. President sent a letter to Karzai apologizing for the unintentional burning of the Korans with Newt Gingrich lashing out that Obama's apology was "astonishing and undeserved". He noted that Obama again has fallen for this moral, ass-kissing posture to Muslims. Remember him genuflecting in front of Saudi Arabia's ruler in 2010? Gingrich said the Afghan President owes the U.S. an apology for the shootings and Obama should say so. He would do better to make a strong rebuke for the constant harassment and killing of Christians in Egypt, Libya, Iran and Iraq before further apologies are considered.

"There seems to be nothing that radical Islamists will do to get Barack Obama's attention in a negative way and he is consistently apologizing to people who do not deserve the apology of the president of the United States...period." Gingrich said and added, "And if Karzai doesn't feel like apologizing then we should say good-bye and good luck to your dung heap. We don't need to be risking our lives and wasting our money on these bearded bastards when your cowardly youth ship out to other countries! I think he has a point.

THE WAY I SEE IT....when you apologise for causing offence and promise never, ever to do it again, you give succour to the idea that offensiveness is a unique and terrible evil and you flatter the ostentatious offence-taking group who wish to be protected by a moral force-field from public debate and ridicule. You set a precedent for future grovelling.

By now effectively reorienting its Afghan mission around improving its Politically Correct credentials and Islamic empathy of its troops, NATO has unwittingly giving a green light to easily offend these scumbag agitators, boosting their belief that any offence is evil and must be quashed. NATO has made itself a hostage to future violence, giving radicals a licence to go mental at the next whiff of any slight, whether intentional or accidental, against their obviously foul religion.

Greece Goes To The Dogs !

When visiting Athens on a much-needed holiday last September, I was amazed to see how many dogs roamed the street. In front of the Parliament House was a large dog standing guard near the real Guard outside the building. There were also dogs across the street in the park and on the steps of the fancy hotels bordering the park. They all seemed to be well fed with some having collars like they were turfed our of their owner's apartments.

John Roskam of the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) solves this canine mystery and asks why Australian taxpayers must get involved:

He says, "Australians will be surprised to learn that, apparently, the federal government now has responsibility to help the city of Athens pay for the feeding of stray dogs in the Greek capital. It seems that Athens has a stupid policy that in no case supports the sheltering or euthanisation of animals. Stray dogs are instead sterilised, tagged, let loose again and fed by the council." Crazy!

He continues, "How countries deal with stray dogs is up to them, But if a country wants to provide stray dogs that are sick with and shelter with constant veterinary care, other countries shouldn't be forced to foot the bill. If the Greek government wants to set the retirement age at 50 it can, but it has to wear the consequences. That's the issue at the heart of whether Australian taxpayers should contribute to an International Monetary Fund bailout of Europe.

The Way I See it....there are times when Australian taxpayers should financially support the governments and citizens of other countries. But Europe in 2012 is not one of those times.

Europe's debt crisis is not an act-of-God. Its problems are the result of deliberate decisions taken over decades. The economics of a dyed-in-the-wool socialised Europe and the Euro are broken and the continent's political system is obviously fatally flawed.

Bailout money, whether from Germany, Australia or China, can't give Europe what it really needs. Europe needs something more than other people's money. It needs a governing class focused on rational economic growth and social welfare....not rule-making.

No More "Reconciliation" !

So...this is what reconciliation looks like on Australia Day, after so many concessions over so many years.

Reconciliation means Prime Minister Julia Gillard and guests, at a ceremony to honour SES members, being trapped by furious Aboriginal protesters inside a Canberra building yesterday being heckled and abused as racists. Disgusting! It means Gillard, fear on her face, being man-handled and falling in the melee as police rushed her to her car for safety, one shoe lost in the crowd.

It means Opposition Leader Tony Abbott also being bundled into Gillard's car to protect him from assault with protesters trying to block the car with its terrified occupants and fighting police and vilely abusing them.

Yet here are some concessions we've made to an obviously ungrateful reconciliation movement that now destroys the cause it preaches. 1) We've allowed a shambolic Aboriginal "tent embassy" to despoil public space in Canberra for 40 years, when we wouldn't tolerate a (non-Abo) Occupy Melbourne protest for 40 days. 2) We've formally apologised to "stolen generations" despite not being able to identify even 10 of the tens of thousands of Aboriginal children said to here been stolen just to breed out colour.(read my post on August 30th, 2010) 3) We've held Sorry Days and marched over bridges behind their alien flag. 4) We've (quite properly) granted Aborigines land rights, even if they never did a thing in 50,000 years to improve their lot or the human race's for that matter. They also got rights to block mining projects of huge economic benefit to all Australians.

5) We've spent BILLIONS to try to lift Aborigines out of poverty while they love to call their Welfare handout "sitting-down-money". There seems to be an absurd fear of seeming "mean" that has stopped our leaders from doing what's most needed. Real"tough-love"! 6) We hold Welcome-to-Country ceremonies and pay respects to Aboriginal elders at government and sporting events to show our good hearts. 7) Andrew Bolt adds, " we've introduced what seems to me apartheid justice, with Koorie Courts and had judges show extraordinary leniency to Aboriginal offenders on the grounds of their culture." (Even yesterday, ACT police assured reporters that none of the ratbags behind the riot would be arrested.)

And now we have a government-formed committee of "experts" recommending new clauses in the Constitution to recognise Aborigines as a race with prior claim to this country, and offering special protections for their meager culture and their "feelings". Oh...please!!! Some of these things my friends you may well support. Some of you may not, because they seem like moves likely to divide us on the grounds of race and to leave no one but pondscum activists better off. After all these changes and compromises hailed by the appeasing socialist Left...why this disgraceful riot?

Protesters blamed Tony Abbott...because he'd said that the tent embassy perhaps should move on since a lot has changed for the better since it was set up---a perfectly rational opinion that any citizen should be free to express without needing police protection. Yet one of the protesters, the head deadshit Michael Anderson, yesterday told the crowd that what Abbott has said amounted to inciting racial riots. Which his followers promptly made a self-fulling claim by staging exactly that and today this hard-core scum burned the Aussie flag after spitting on it in front of Parliament House!

The Way I See It...this is not reconciliation. This is instead a warning that the wrong path has been taken, leading us to deeper divisions, entrenched by laws, and with dissent punished in the courts or on the streets. It means each concession, no matter how extreme, is feeding a hunger for yet more and is just dividing us more along racial lines.

Let's learn from yesterday's shame and say "NO". No to those ungrateful race-baiters. No to laws dividing us by race. No to those who want to shut down the debate on all this; those that can't stand the truth of what they've become. And let's say "YES" to judging each other not by colour of our skin or the race of our ancestors, but by the content of our character. As individuals. That means the reconciliation movement must end....it's just too dangerous.

NOTE: The current use of INDIGENOUS to describe Aboriginals is incorrect. The word indigenous means "born and raised in the country one is living in". That makes every person, black, white or brindle that has been born and presently lives in Australia INDIGENOUS. It was probably some socialist, elitist, academic schmuck that started this politically correct usage. The vernacular works perfectly fine for the majority of true-blue Aussies.

"Stealth Jihad" Is In Australia !

Everywhere all over the Western world it's the same story: Muslim groups are growing ever more aggressive in demanding concessions to Islamic law and practice, and Western authorities are responding with eager submission, even when such concessions involve restrictions on long-cherished freedoms. And in every instance, the lamestream media focus public attention upon those who are determined to resist the advance of Islamic law, as of those standing up for freedom were the problem, not those devious scum that at trying to destroy it. I first warned you about this last year in my May 18th posting.

I've discovered the Q Society, an Australian human rights group, that's keeping track of stealth jihad in Australia. Their spokeswoman, Vickie Jansen, reports that "Latrobe University has its Muslim-only toilets and prayer rooms. A group of Aussie Muslims is campaigning for exclusively-Muslim prayer rooms in a Western Australia hospital on the basis that they need to avoid the idolatry that may occur if they share with other faiths." Ms Jansen goes on, "our public schools are adapting to a Muslim Perspectives curriculum project in which, among many other things, not just female-only swimming is recommended for Muslim students, but for exclusively Muslim-only swimming pool periods. Some public schools are catering to diversity by ensuring tuckshops are exclusively Halal." (Sounds like a resurrected form of apartheid to me)

The demands of Muslim groups all over the Western world for separate facilities are in the service of a supremacist ideology that emanates from the Koranic assertions that Muslims are the "best of people" (3:110), while unbelievers are the "vilest of created beings" (98:6). "Unbelievers are unclean" (9:28) which leads to the conclusion that Muslim should avoid contact with them. (Then tell the bastards to stay home from school!) Every capitulation made to these demands only feeds these supremacist notions, by the likes of the Muslim Brotherhood, which work directly against the principles of equal justice and equal rights for all.

Nevertheless, left-leaning, ass-kissing Western politicians are eager to accommodate these demands. Last month, the Deputy Premier of Queensland, Andrew Fraser, denounced the Q Society for fliers protesting the introduction of misleading and whitewashed material about Islam into Australian schools. "Modern Australia has a proud multicultural heritage," thundered dead-shit Fraser'. "This kind of prejudicial rubbish has no place anywhere, let alone here in Queensland."

So in Fraser's view, to advance an apartheid-like system that institutionalises the oppression of women and non-Muslims serves Australia's "proud multicultural heritage," but to resist that system in the name of freedom and equality of rights for all is prejudicial rubbish." (God Help Us !) That is precisely the position that Islamic supremacist groups take in the U.S. as well...and Fraser, like so many opportunist politicians eagerly parrot their line.

The Way I See It....there is a sad reality that such demands are part of the stealth jihad that endeavors to advance Islamic law in Western countries through non-violent means....and what better way to accomplish this than by playing on the West's fears or racism and bigotry to win concessions as a victimised group?

The irony here is that the Australian (and American) politicians who allow themselves to be used in this way are abetting the advance of a system that is far more repressive and ridden with inequalities than anything in any modern Western country. But they will probably realize this only when they themselves fall victim to that system, as--if it continues to advance--they certainly will.

New Year's Warning: The Durban Bible !

Every New Years Day I reflect on the state of the world's Climate Change position. For many years I have noted the extensive use of quasi-religious language by climate activists. Followers of the hypothesis that man's responsible for so-called dangerous climate change are referred to as "believers"whilst doubters are often labelled "deniers", "sceptics" and even "heretics".

The public shaming and bullying of any scientist who differs from climate science orthodoxy is eerily reminiscent of a latter-day Salem Witch Trial or Spanish Inquisition with public "floggings" meted out metaphorically speaking for their thought crimes. Elements of the climate change movement are beginning to bear more resemblance to a religious cult than a scientific community. Dalliances with authoritarianism are never far from the fringes of the this metaphysical ideology. Environmentalism intends to radically change the world regardless of the consequences (at a cost of human lives and severe restrictions on individual freedom).

Last month's Durban Global Warming conference was a farce. It included over 14,570 "carpetbaggers" from dozens of organisations you'd never hear of otherwise, living on this gravy train, who came to settle once and for all a global strategy to curb carbon emissions that would reduce the world's warming (totally ignoring the Inconvenient Truth that temperatures haven't risen in 10 years!). All the major countries and the 10 Hollywood stars present succeeded in doing was to agree to agree to some 2020 reduction. Nothing was signed or committed to so it was a actually a dud, but that didn't end there. Now this is freaky. I've heard that the planet savers at this IPCC summit are working on a draft document that reads in part like the Bible of a new Green Faith. Here are the main points of this manifesto that are not just off-the-wall but are based on the obvious deification of the Earth (the Gaia hypothesis):

# A new International Climate Court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever larger sums to 3rd world countries in the name of paying for supposed "climate debt". The Court will have no power over 3rd world countries. Here and throughout the draft the West is the sole target. This Bible is irredeemably anti-Western.

# Rights of Mother Earth: to ensure respect for the intrinsic laws of nature with subheadings that have been written by feeble-minded green activists and environmental extremists.

# Right to survive: The draft childishly asserts that "people have a right to survive the treats and impacts of climate change, including sea level rise (even though the latest satellite shows the sea-level has actually dropped over the past 3 years).

# War and the maintenance of defence forces and equipment are to cease, just like that...because they contribute to climate change. Like that's really going work!

# A new global temperature target will aim to limit global warming to as little as 1 C above pre-industrial levels. Since the temperature is already 3 C above that level what is being proposed is a 2C cut which would literally take us halfway back towards the last Ice Age and would kill hundreds of millions. Colder is far more dangerous than warmer. Dumb and dumber!

# The new CO2 emissions target for Western countries only, will be a reduction of up to 50% in emissions over the next 8 years and of "more than 100%" (these words actually appear in the text) by 2050! So, no motor cars, no coal-fired or gas-fired power stations, no aircraft, no trains. It's back to the Middle Ages, but without even the right to light a fire in your hovel. "Renewables" are the alternative energy sources mentioned without one word of the need for rapid expansion of carbon-free nuclear power worldwide to prevent near-total economic destruction.

#The West will pay for everything, because of its "historical responsibility" for causing global warming. Third world countries will not be obliged to pay anything. But it is the U.N. not the 3rd world countries, that will get the money from the West. There is no provision anywhere in this Bible for the U.N. to publish accounts of how it has spent the $100 billion a year the draft demands that the Western countries should fork over from now on.

The Way I See It...my hopes, after the 12 years of intimately researching and writing about the global warming alarmism and the eco-facist green movement fueling it, were that it would be exposed for what it really is by now. I am somewhat encouraged that it is slowly happening with more and more scientists willing to say and write about their doubts about the need to fear temperature rise and its dubious linkage to CO2 levels. My further hope is that political leaders of Western countries see the writing on the wall and what awaits them and their citizens if they sign up or even give credence to this Green bullshit Bible and its anti-human ideology. I wonder....what is it about "GREEN" that make it synonymous with "STUPID'' ?

There Goes Freedom of Speech !

As Reported in The NOT SORRY NEWS: In late September this year the Jewish High Court Judge Mordecai Bromberg ruled that Melbourne journalist, Andrew Bolt, had racially vilified 9 alleged Aborigines by pointing out that although they were as Fair-skinned as the whitest Australian and some having had very little Aboriginal ancestry, they nevertheless chose to identify as Aborigines, many for reasons of gain.

In his articles (2009), Bolt criticised these fair-skinned Aborigines for what he argued was a choice they made, as people with mostly European blood, to emphasise their indigenous heritage over their white heritage. He wrote that some of these fair-skinned Abos, whom he called "political Aboriginality", had received prominence or indigenous awards because they chose to identify with their scant Aboriginality.

The Jewish lawyer for the so-called Aborigines, Ron Merkel, said Bolt was free to express his views on the subject, but should not have chosen to attack the 9 individuals he named in his newspaper columns and blog. He even had the nerve to compare his blog with Nazi writings against the Jews in Germany that asserted that they provoked the rise of the holocaust! Neil Young, lawyer for Bolt, said that was preposterous and argued that freedom of speech trumped other rights and was the cornerstone of democracy.

Mr Bolt took the stand and argued that those who chose to identify with only one part of their background were contributing to racism and came at the cost of less focus on the important issues of education, housing, health and poverty. Unfortunately Judge Bromberg, probably relating to the nasty Holocaust vision by Ron Merkel, ruled against Mr Bolt and every other white Australian with an opinion on the matter. In essence, this insane verdict by Bromberg is endorsing the crazy Racial Vilification Act, which can be used as a battering ram by everybody except white Caucasians to try and silence any criticism of every two-bit minority that wants to play the Race Card.

Andrew Bolt published the absolute and unvarnished truth about Aboriginality. There is not a shadow of a doubt that the 9 plaintiffs have used traces of Aboriginal ancestry to identify as being Aboriginal. What this means is that a person with one-sixteenth Aboriginal ancestry can legitimately imply that he or she is a full-blood Abo and use this as a vehicle to claim all sorts of benefits. It can be easily proven that some of these 9 plaintiffs have exactly that. What a rort!

The Way I See It...that idiot judge has now politicised genetic science by ruling that these and other Abos standing can be legally changed and legally recognised if that person asserts that he is of the race chosen by him...screw DNA testing. This concept these 9 Abos are attesting to and want put into the law books is so stupid, racist and down-right wrong.

We stand right behind Andrew Bolt and his comments about these nine "ghost'' Aborigines. We and many in the journalistic and legal profession condemn this ridiculously stupid verdict by Bromberg and state that this sort of action brings the whole system of Australian jurisprudence into utter contempt. How could any same person have anything but contempt for that scumbag Ron Merkel for pursuing litigation that tramples on the very fundamental concept of freedom of speech, the press and expression, as well as trying to politically and legally overturn scientific fact? Andrew should point-blank refuse to apologise or retract anything has has said in this matter and refuse to pay one cent of compensation. He ought to give those plaintiffs the finger and tell them to stick it up their WHITE asses!