UK “Equalities” Chief Admits He Was Wrong, Muslims Won’t Assimilate !
By Pamela Geller, Breitbart London, April 10, 2016:
In one of the most extraordinary admissions of defeat in
modern times, Trevor Phillips, the former chief of Britain’s Equalities
and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), has admitted that the path that
Britain has been on for years is a catastrophic failure. Muslims won’t
assimilate and become loyal Britons.
Phillips wrote: “For a long time, I too thought that
Europe’s Muslims would become like
previous waves of migrants, gradually
abandoning their ancestral ways, wearing their religious and cultural
baggage lightly, and gradually blending into Britain’s diverse identity
landscape. I should have known better.” Instead, he wrote, Muslims are
creating “nations within nations” in the West.
It is astonishing that any member of the ruling elite would
admit defeat and state what is painfully obvious to any rational human
being who for the last few years has been watching the disintegration of
the Western mores and law in the wake of Muslim immigration.
Muslims are the only immigrant group that comes to Western
countries with a ready-made model of society and government (sharia)
which they believe to be superior to what we have here, and they work to
The question is, now that Phillips has spoken up and stated
the truth, what will the UK do now? Continue to jail those who speak
critically of jihad and sharia? Or will the UK begin shutting down
mosques that incite Muslims to wage jihad?
Will it prohibit hate preachers from speaking on UK college
campuses, and instead invite my colleagues? Will Muslim immigration from
jihad nations be halted? Will sharia courts be shut down?
This admission of defeat is all the more remarkable coming
from Phillips, who popularized the term “Islamophobia” in Britain. As I
explained in my book Stop the Islamization of America, the very
word is a fictional construct. It was popularized deliberately by a
Muslim Brotherhood front organization, the International Institute for
Islamic Thought (IIIT).
Abdur Rahman Muhammad, a member of the IIIT who has
renounced the group in disgust,
was an eyewitness to the development of
the word. “This loathsome term,” he wrote, “is nothing more then I
thought terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim thing tanks
for the purpose of beating down critics.”
The term “Islamophobia” was designed specifically for the
Western mindset of liberal white guilt, stealing the “civil rights”
narrative from black Americans and mining the “oppression” of Native
Americans, even throwing in the spectre of the Japanese internment camps
during World War II.
These are the clubs Islamic supremacists in the West use to
beat anyone who dares to speak out or push back against the encroaching
sharia, the appeasement of Islamic supremacists and their demands in the
secular marketplace, and the restriction of free speech. It was why I was
banned from the UK, which is acting like a de facto Islamic state.
In reality, “Islamophobia” is nothing more than a term that
Islamic supremacists use to enforce the Islamic blasphemy laws in the
West: in Islamic law, to defame or insult Muhammad or Islam is blasphemy,
and in many Muslim countries it’s punishable by death. That is why devout
Muslims tried to slaughter all of us in Garland, Texas last May, at our
Muhammad art exhibit in the defence of the freedom of speech.
The handful of us who have, for years, predicted and warned
of the disastrous consequences of large-scale Muslim immigration have
been smeared, defamed, and blacklisted — our reputations destroyed. And
now once again we have been shown to have been right all along.
in five Muslims in Britain never enter a non-Muslim house;
per cent of Muslims, male and female, say a woman should always obey
per cent of British Muslims support the right of a man to have
more than one wife;
per cent of Muslims did not believe that homosexuality should be
per cent of Muslims support the introduction of sharia law rather
than the laws laid down by parliament.
These numbers are consistent with numerous polls that have
been conducted over the past decade. It’s not just the UK. According to a
recent poll, 58% of Muslims in the United States reject First Amendment
criticism of Islam as a right. 46% want blasphemy punished, 12% want
Muslims believe that sharia law is divine and therefore
supersedes all national, “manmade” laws.
Phillips admits: “Liberal opinion in Britain has, for more
than two decades, maintained that most Muslims are just like everyone
else''… Britain desperately wants to think of its Muslims as versions of
the Great British Bake Off winner Nadiya Hussain, or the cheeky-chappie
athlete Mo Farah. But thanks to the most detailed and comprehensive
survey of British Muslim opinion yet conducted, we now know that just
isn’t how it is.
This is a huge change for him. He commissioned “the
Runnymede report” on Islamophobia” in 1997, making the term mainstream.
Now he says: “Twenty years ago… I published the report titled
Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All, we thought that the real risk of
the arrival of new communities was discrimination against Muslims. Our 1996 survey of recent incidents showed that there was
plenty of it around. But we got almost everything else wrong.”
They got that wrong, too. How many times have we seen a
supposed act of “Islamophobia” turn out to have been committed by
Muslims? Phillips’ new realism may bring some sanity back to Britain
regarding Muslim immigration, and even strengthen the campaigns of U.S.
presidential candidates who have called for a halt to that immigration on
national security grounds – including that of Donald Trump andSen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
Cruz was the only Presidential candidate who stood up for
us in the wake of the Garland jihad attack.This is because we are facing
the same problem in the U.S., where some of our most respected Muslim
leaders have openly stated they want Islamic rule here. These aren’t
people on the fringe. These men are mainstream traitors, and are or have been the
leaders of the key Muslim organizations in the U.S.:
Siddiqi, chairman of both the Fiqh Council of North America and the
North American Islamic Trust: “As Muslims, we should participate in
the system to safeguard our interests and try to bring gradual
change, (but) we must not forget that Allah’s rules have to be
established in all lands, and all our efforts should lead to that
Ahmad, co-founder and long-time Board chairman of the Hamas-tied
Council on American-Islamic Relations:“Islam isn’t in America to be
equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Quran should
be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted
religion on Earth.”
spokesman Ibrahim Hooper: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression
that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be
Islamic sometime in the future.”
Wahhaj of the Muslim Alliance in North America: “In time, this
so-called democracy will crumble, and there will be nothing. And the
only thing that will remain will be Islam.”
Shakir of Zaytuna College in Berkeley, Calif.: “If we put a
nationwide infrastructure in place and marshalled our resources,
we’d take over this country in a very short time. . . . What a great
victory it will be for Islam to have this country in the fold and
ranks of the Muslims.”
Phillips says: “Some of my journalist friends imagine that,
with time, the Muslims will grow out of it. They won’t.” That’s right. So
what is he going to do about the Islamic threat?
I live up to my name and speak frankly and for the silent majority so as to counter-balance the leftist, political correctness that pervades my country. I do not hold any legitimate racist feeling against anyone but I will always try to put crossed-referenced information on current events in a proper perspective that will allow for better understanding and discussions among people. My use of colourful language only adds to getting my point across. It's still a free country as far as I can see.
To put more it directly:
Freedom of speech is the paramount freedom. Without it, we struggle to exercise our other freedoms. With it, we can fight for those freedoms. It may be offensive, insulting and make some governments uncomfortable, but if this is the price to be paid for living in a society where all claims are open to question, then it is a price worth paying.
Feel free to join the I.P.A., the Institute of Public Affairs to help preserve the ideal of freedoms we are now enjoying.
Please note: Feel free to make a comment if you find it interesting and/or entertaining.