Ever wondered why there are more women than men (there always have been)? The reasons are manifold but mainly it is because historically it was only men who went to wars, it was only the men who were killed.
Men have always had a lower average life expectancy. Women have always lived longer. Females have always been the inferior, unwanted species, boys were what it was all about and that is mainly still the case especially in Asia .
China’s one-child policy has left a population imbalance with a preponderance of boys exchanging Valentine's Day cards. Parents confined to one child could not afford the risk of producing a girl so, with the aid of sex identification at six weeks, it was a simple case of procuring abortions until the foetus proved to be male.
India was a little behind the times so baby girls had their arms and legs broken and were sent out on the street to beg. Asia still relies on its working sons to provide aged parental welfare not provided by governments.
Seraglios (or harems) in the Muslim world contain many wives and concubines (hookers or women of inferior rank) who are all expected to be pregnant most of the time. Harems are not a sexual thing. Historically harems were necessary because armies regularly lost up to half their men in battle and all available uteri had to be utilised upon the army’s return.
Roman armies planned for decimation. And that was only the loss of one-tenth of an army.
A woman can only produce one child a year, a man can produce thousands.
A soldier was required by law to take his dead brother’s wife no matter how ugly she was. Army generals had the choice of multiple widows… utilising vacant uteri was a rule of the militaries so as to maintain the combat strength of a nation or village, otherwise in a few short years it would be over-run without the protection of men.
Invading armies always took the fertile women back home with them.
Even the Bible says that a man must take his slain brother’s wife and probably not because he has the hots for her. The fact is that throughout history fertile women have been a valuable, economic commodity.
Captured German women who could no longer give birth to Germans
Okay, I can hear the feminists screaming, “troglodytic misogynist” already! Well, stiff shit girls, that’s the way it has always been in all species, and it will probably take millennia to change humans… other species can never change.
Most male animals use a female’s urine to test their hotness or readiness to mate but it will be a while before blokes in nightclubs sniff out females before curling their top lips to taste those yummy pheromones. No, a bloke will caress her thigh or kiss her neck risking a slapped face. That's a price we're happy to pay.
Some idiot blokes even fight over an available female as a stallion or an elk will do. How stupid is that? As I said, there are more women than blokes so why fight, there will be another one on the next corner.
But all male animal species will fight to the death to retain their hard-won coterie of females who will guarantee the furtherance of the species' welfare .
The females don’t really care who impregnates them as long as it’s the superior winner of a contest. Many females mate with multiple males thereby ensuring those poor males, (who believe the offspring is theirs) are conned into protecting and feeding the young which are most likely not theirs at all. Clever little females!
Lions who have defeated a pride’s old male will kill the cubs so as to stop the lionesses lactating and bring them in season. Most females will not ovulate while lactating.
Every male of every species believes his genes are superior.
Breeding is all about the attractive of the species and the attractive one is he who the female decides will produce the strongest and best offspring most suited to an abiding environment.
It will be hard for feminists to get their head around this but an attractive Inuit is short and obese, a signal to the female Inuit that this bloke can stay out on the winter ice for longer and bring home more whale and seal meat for her offspring.
An attractive Aboriginal male to a lubra is skinny and tall, with fast-twitch muscles, able to react with speed, resist the sun and run down emus. All cold weather species are fat, all hot weather species are skinny… there are no fat coyotes and very few skinny walruses.
The best thoroughbred breeding sites in the world are in cold climates because foals invariably put on more weight more quickly.
So the world-wide hysteria over male molestation of women is largely misplaced. Women have always been prepared to trade their wares for progress. But women can’t complain about being touched when they advertise their wonderful wares so prolifically.
Men can’t keep their hands off a beautiful new Aston Martin …is a woman any different when she dresses up to attract men? I mean if she doesn’t want to be touched then wear a sandwich board and we won’t go near her, but that’s not what she wants, is it?
Yes, the pilloried white male is only doing what comes naturally, two beautiful breasts advertised with an irresistible cleavage, bare legs all the way up to inviting thighs, no more Cottontails… oh no, it’s now a thong sporting a deliciously bare bum and a finely manicured front bum. Red lipstick, rouge and toe and nail polish, the colour of arousal in all species. Topped off with a pheromone laden perfume! WTF are we supposed to do… ignore it all?
If we are NOT beguiled by a woman’s beauty, we are considered offensively rude and asked to explain why.
The Way I See It...........it comes down to signals. And don’t tell me women don’t signal their sexuality. But sometimes we blokes get the signals wrong. The signals might not be for us but might be for a husband or boyfriend and what bloke won’t respect that? But the signals are there for all present ‘tho.
So you sheilas can stop this “respect us” bullshit, that’s easily solved. Just dress up like a butch bird in a bloke’s clothes and it’s guaranteed only another butch sheila will be interested. A bloke will not come near you,
… but that’s not what you really want, is it girls?
No comments:
Post a Comment