There Goes The Neighbourhood (Part 2) !

A news roundup from last week's Sydney Morning Herald, giving us Aussies another bracing insight into the success of our immigration program. (I first exposed this situation in a posting on 22 June, 2011):

     ITEM  1:   When two men in traditional Middle Eastern dress sat down with the owner of a Bankstown restaurant recently, they were after one thing. At first they shared a hookah pipe and chatted amiably about religion, but the conversation quickly turned to extortion: they wanted $50,000 in exchange for ''protection''. The terrified restaurant owner told Fairfax Media they asked him a menacing question; ''Have you heard of the Brothers 4 Life?''

It's a question many south-west Sydney communities are grappling with as the vermin, in the form of a gang founded by the murderer Bassam Hamzy attempts to flex its muscles in Sydney again. With shootings and gun crime reaching fever pitch, the group's insignia of two crossed AK47 machine guns has appeared at crime scenes with increasing regularity.

In October, Yehya Amoud was shot dead as he and a friend, Bassam Hijazi, sat in an expensive Mercedes that bore the number plate B F L . And in August, a 16 year old boy was shot in the leg in a driveway scrawled with Brothers 4 Life graffiti. T-shirts with the insignia could also be seen being worn by ugly-looking men who were among the crowd during the violent Muslim protest in Hyde Park in September. Have you noticed, it is rare to spot a good looking man amongst this ilk? Seriously, underworld sources said the group was on a recruitment drive looking for Young Middle Eastern men who could act as foot soldiers and carry out drug runs and criminal acts in exchange for protection and power.

Wasn't the second generation meant to assimilate into the community the way their parents understandably could not?  Opps!  Seems we were given a false assurance.

     ITEM 2:  A father who took his son out for bike ride has been stabbed by a gang of teenagers who wanted a turn on the bicycle. According to police, the 58 year-old man was with his son in a park in the southwest Sydney suburb of Canley Vale last Saturday evening when three teenagers, aged about 15, asked to borrow the boy's bike. No doubt to steal it. The detail provided by the police media release was unaccountably missing from the newspaper's website; ''Investigators have been given only limited descriptions of the males involved, with all three being of Middle Eastern/Mediterranean appearance and aged around 15 years. Some much for the ''lame-stream'' telling Australians the harsh facts of life in multicultural Australia.

     ITEM 3:  This is a doosey! Australia's biggest mosque has removed an online posting that called for a ''fatwa'' against Christmas...following harsh condemnation from religious communities. The Lakemba Mosque (see photo) had posted the religious ruling or ''fatwa'' on its Facebook page just before Christmas, warning followers it was a ''sin'' to even wish people a Merry Christmas. It followed a similar lecture during Friday prayers at this western Sydney mosque.

The head imam at Lakemba, Sheikh Yahya Safi, stupidly told the congregation during prayers that they should not take part in anything to do with Christmas. (Even though Islam holds Jesus in high regard as a prophet). Samier Dandan, the president of the Lebanese Muslim Association (LMA) confirmed to the press that the post had been removed from the mosque's Facebook page. He said a youth worker had copied the text of the fatwa from another Islamic website and it did not reflect Sheikh Safi's views of the LMA.

The Way I See It....of course, is we can choose to take comfort from the backtracking and weaselly excuse making -- as well as the condemnation by other more sensible Muslims. Or we might wonder what else is preached in Australia's biggest mosque that is not reported and therefore not recanted. It should be the responsibility of the Imam to get the word out, from the pulpit, Facebook or whatever to condemn the filth that has become the Brothers 4 Life and their actions or must Australians close the door on more potential Muslim Non-Assimilators?

Note: The census bureau tells us there are more Buddhists than Muslims in this country of ours. Yet, I cannot find a single reference in any of our newspapers of Buddhist Australians behaving badly. Maybe these Islamists should throw out the Koren as a guide to morality and substitute it with a more relevant and modern book, ''How To Win Friends and Influence People" by Dale Carnegie.

FBI: Hammers, Clubs Kill More People Than Rifles or Shotguns !

The latest annual FBI crime statistics show that more people are killed with clubs and hammers each year than by rifles or shotguns. In 2011, there were 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs. There were 356 murders in which a shotgun was the deadly weapon of choice.

The national debate on guns has grown more intense since December 14th when Adam Lanza forced his way into Sandy Hook Elementary School and killed 20 chidren and 6 adults before committing suicide. There are 88.8 firearms per 100 people in the U.S.. In second place is Yemen, with 54.8, then Switzerland with 45.7 and Finland with 45.3. With gun violence in America ''off-the-chart'' compared with every other country on the planet the thinking is, in the words of New York Times columnist David Brooks, ''a problem of psychology, not sociology.''

Gun vendors told news outlets that the hottest items were such weapons as the AR-15 (see photo), a semi-automatic rifle that Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has proposed bnning as part of a package of gun regulations. The AR-15 rifle is the same weapon owned by Lanza's mother and used during the school shootings. The law currently proposed by Sen. Feinstein would strengthen the expired Bush 1994 Assault Weapons ban, outlaw certain rifles and handguns, and restrict ''high capacity'' magazines, in addition to compulsory gun registration (similar to Australia) under the National Firearms Act.

The number of FBI background checks required for Americans buying guns set a record in December with many guns ending up as Christmas presents. According to Reuters, the FBI recorded 2.78 million background checks during the month, surpassing the mark set in November of 2.01 million checks - about a 39% rise!  The FBI report concedes that some of the ''murder by rifle'' statistics should be increased slightly because some murders don't take non-categorized types of guns into account. However, data still shows that amount of people killed by hammers, clubs and other blunt instruments still continues to rise each year. Strangely, there seems to be no data on the number of knife murders occuring. Since Australia's gun ban the rise of stabbing murders has risen dramatically.

The Way I See It....even as gun purchases rise, the share of actual U.S. households with guns has been falling for decades, from 54% in 1977 to 32% in 2011 (according to the University of Chicago). The other argument against any serious gun control is that it's unconstitutional; an attempt to undo American history. In fact, something close to the opposite is true. Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at UCLA, documents the actual history in ''Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America''.

Guns were regulated in the U.S. from the earliest years of the Republic. Laws that banned the carrying of concealed weapons were passed as early as 1813. Congress passed the first set of federal laws regulating, licensing and taxing guns in 1934. The act was challenged in the Supreme Court in 1939 where the it stated, ''The Second Amendment grants people a right that is not one which may be utilized for private purposes but only one which exists where arms are borne in the miltia provided for by law and intended for the protection of the state.''

Things started to change in the 1970's as various right-wing groups coalesced to challenge gun control, overtuirning laws in state legislatures, Congress and the courts. But Chief Justice Warren Burger, appointed by Richard Nixon, described the new interpretation of the Second Amendment in an interview after his tenure as ''one of the greatest pieces of fraud -- I repeat the word FRAUD -- on the American public by special-interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.''  So, when people throw up their hands and say nothing can be done about guns, tell them they're being Un-American -- and unintelligent.

Killers May Be Crazy, But They're Not Stupid !

In the wake of a monstrous crime like that nut-case's murder of defenseless women and children at the Newtown, Connecticut elementary school, the nation's attention is riveted on what could have been done to prevent such a massacre. Of course the knee-jerk reaction is to BAN, Ban , ban all guns and surmise that it'll make people safer without looking at the reality of both sides of gun ownership. I have already brought out two aspects of this argument in recent postings; one regarding the serious assessment, incarceration and treatment of mentally-suspect individuals and the other showing that a gun ban in Australia didn't necessarily make Australians any safer. But wait...there's more!

Luckily, some years ago, two famed economists, William Landes at the University of Chicago and John Lott at Yale, conducted a massive study of multiple victim public shootings in the United States between 1977 and 1995 to see how various legal changes affected their frequency and death toll. Landes and Lott examined many of the very policies proposed right now in response to the Sandy Hook massacre: waiting periods with background checks for guns, the death penalty and increased penalties for committing a crime with a gun. None of these policies had any effect on the frequency of, or carnage from, multiple-victim shootings. (I note that they did not look at reforming America's lax mental health laws, presumably because deadshits like the ACLU and the Civil Liberties Union are working to keep dangerous nuts on the street in 50 states.)

Their conclusion: Only one public policy has ever been shown to reduce the death rate from such crimes;  CONCEALED-CARRY LAWS.

The effect of concealed-carry laws in deterring mass public shootings was even greater than the impact of such laws on the murder rate generally. Look at it this way....someone planning to commit a single murder in a concealed-carry state only has to weigh the odds of one person being armed. But a criminal or fruitcake planning to commit murder in a public place has to worry that anyone in the entire area might have a gun. You will notice that most multiple-victim shootings occur in ''gun-free zones'' -- even within states that have concealed-carry laws: public schools, churches, Sikh temples, post offices, the movie theater (where James Holmes committed mass murder) and in a Portland, Oregon mall where a nut gunned down shoppers a few weeks ago. Guns were banned in all these places. My conclusion:  Mass killers may be crazy, but they are not stupid !

If the deterrent effect of concealed-carry laws seems surprising to you, that's because the media hide stories of armed citizens stopping mass shooters. At the Portland shooting, for example, no explanation was given that the assailant managed to kill only two people in the busy Christmas season mall. It turns out, he was stopped by a concealed-carry-holder who hadn't noticed the mall was labeled ''gun-free zone'', and seeing the man's gun was pointed at him, he killed himself. If we care about reducing the number of people killed in mass shootings, shouldn't we pay particular attention to the cases where the aspiring mass murderer was prevented from getting off more than a couple of rounds?

In addition to the Portland mall case, here are a few more examples excluded by the ''lame-media": 
--- Palace Theater, San Antinio, Texas, last month: Jesus Garcia shoots at a movie theater, a car and bystanders at the nearby China Garden restaurant; as he enters the theater, guns blazing, an armed off-duty cop shoots Garcia four times, stopping the attack. Total Dead: Zero.
--- Winnemucca, Nevada, 2009:  Ernesto Villagomez opens fire in a crowded restaurant; concealed-carry-holder shoots him dead. Total Dead:  Two
--- Appalachian School of Law, 2003: A crazed immigrant shoots the dean and a professor, then begins shooting students; as he goes to reload, two armed students point their guns at him as a third student tackles him.  Total dead: Three
--- Santee, California, 2002: Student begins shooting his classmates and the campus supervisor; a father who happened to bring his daughter to school points his gun at the shooter, holding him until the police arrive.  Total dead: two
--- Pearl High School, Mississippi, 1999: After shooting several people at his high school, student heads for the junior high school; assistant principle Joel Myrick retrieves his 45 pistol from his car and points it at the gunman's head, ending the murder spree. Total dead: Two

By contrast, the shootings in gun-free zones invariably result in far higher casualty figures -- Sikh temple, Oak Creek, Wisconsin (six dead'; Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia (32 dead); Columbine High School, Colorado (12 dead); Amish school, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania (5 little girls dead); public school, Craighead, Arkansas (5 killed, including 4 little girls). Again...these all took place in gun-free zones, resulting in lots of innocent people getting killed.

The Way I See It....there should be a ban on military semi-automatic weapons as President Bush originally envisioned as well as stopping the no-accountability (no background checks) shopping at gun-shows. These are the two main areas that need to be addressed right now and the NRA should endorse these measures without hesitation. But any other draconian civil rights violations must be avoided. Are you listening Senator Diane Feinstein???

If what we care about is saving the lives of innocent human beings by reducing the number of mass public shootings and the deaths they cause, only one policy has ever been shown to work: concealed-carry laws. On the other hands, if what we care about is self-indulgent grandstanding, and to hell with dozens of innocent children being murdered in cold blood, try the other policies.

Australia's More Violent......Despite Gun Ban !

With all the talk in the United States about the terrible massacre in Sandy Hook and the political will  to initialize a gun control program to prevent it from happening again one point is missing....it won't reduce violent crime. Much has been written about the great success of the ''Australian initiative" of a nation-wide ban on military firearms and tight control of rifles and handguns. Unfortunately it is the product of the revisionist history of anti-rights proponents who claim that since Australia instituted their gun ban, there have been no mass murders with no mention of the marked increase in knife murders.

It is a common fantasy that gun bans make society safer. An organization called Peace Movement - Aotearoa, based in New Zealand, touts itself as ''interested in peace and social justice'' and has a fact sheet on their website entitled '' Sharp Drop in Gun Crime Follows Tough Australia Firearm Laws.''  It's very revealing that gun ban organizations validate gun control by focusing on gun-involved violence while avoiding any mention of overall violent crime trends. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, there was a slight drop in the percent of murders committed with a firearm between 2001 and 2009 (16.0% and 13,4% respectively). However, the percentage was highest in 2006 (16.3% and remains higher than the low of 8.9% in 2005. Guns were used in 6.4% of all robberies in both 2001 and 2009.

In 2002....five years after enacting its gun ban the ''Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged that the gun ban had no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime: ''The percentage of homicides committed with a firearm continued its declining trend since 1969.''  Even the head of Australia's Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Don Weatherburn, acknowledged that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime. He states, ''There has been a drop in firearm-related crime, particularly in homicide, but it began long before the new laws and has continued on afterwards. I don't think anyone really understands why. A lot of people assume that the tougher laws did it, but I would need more specific, convincing evidence.''

Mr Weatherburn adds, There has been a more specific problem with handguns, which rose up quite rapidly and then declined. The decline appears to have more to do with the arrest of those responsible than the new laws. As soon as the heroin shortage hit, the armed robbery rate came down. As always, I repeat, the best crime measure consists of good police work and the arrest of those responsible. The rise of Lebo (Lebanese) crime/drug gangs, bikies and their squabbles and now with young Muslims and Sudanese show an ease to acquire handguns that the poor honest citizen must jump through many ''hoops'' to own one.''

Between 1995 and 2009, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2% and robbery 6.4%. Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9% ! Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2%. At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased31.8%: rape dropped 19.2%; robbery decreased 33.2%; aggravated assault dropped 32.2%. Australian women are now raped over 3 times as often as American women (whom, if reports are correct, are arming themselves at record rates). More women, from soccer moms to professionals are ''packing heat'' for sport, self-empowerment and protection, sadly, something Aussie gals find very hard to do.

The Way I See It....Australia and America both experienced similar decreases in murder rates: Between 1995 and 2009, Australia saw a 31.9% decrease; without the gun ban, America's rate dropped 31.7%.  Go figure.

While this doesn't prove that more guns would impact crime rates, it does prove that gun control is a flawed policy. Moreover, for groups like the Peace Movement - Aotearoa, it's apparently social justice when more people are raped, robbed and assaulted, as long as they cannot defend themselves with firearms. This highlights the most important point: Gun banners promote failed policy irregardless of the consequences to the people who must live with them.

NOTE: For in-depth analysis of the dangerous side-effects of Britain's and Australia's gun bans, read Chapter 2 of  Four Hundred  Years of Gun Control: Why Isn't It Working?, which deconstructs the gun control agenda and should motivate more people to support the civil right of self-defense.

Boudoir Photography: A Divisive New Trend ?

BLOGGER's NOTE:  As this is my 121st Posting for the year (more than the past 2 years combined), I decided I should end this informative year with a more or less light-hearted posting.

Before saying ''I do,'' more brides-to-be are stripping down for a sexy photoshoot as a pre-wedding gift to their grooms-to-be. Is this just a regrettable fad or an empowering form of body art?

No longer is it enough for engaged couples to commission awkward, contrived posed engagement photos and force them on family and friends. A new trend in wedding photos has arrived. At the boudoir photography session, brides-to-be are stripping down either partially or completely and paying to have soft-porn photos taken of themselves as a gift for their ''intended''.

Some critics cringe at the prospect of future generations looking back at these supposedly treasured photos of their parents, but boudoir photography specialists say it's an empowering form of body art. So what is Boudoir Photography exactly? Actually, the word boudoir dates back to the Victorian era when it referred to a lady's private rooms, which she used for dressing or bathing. By extension, boudoir photography describes shots that capture a woman simulating such private activities. The photos show women in lingerie, or without lingerie, posing coyly or provocatively. Brides, who represent the bulk of boudoir clients, ''often bring veils, garters and wedding night lingerie, but their future spouses' favourite sports jersey are also popular,'' says Michelle Ruiz at The Daily News.

''And it's not just straight, childless brides who commission boudoir photos,'' comments Brooklyn photographer Amber Marlow in her blog, Marlow. ''I have done boudoir shoots for lesbians, and for ladies who are glowing and bursting at the seams with a soon-to-be-born baby. Ms Marlow also takes offense at comparisons between boudoir and porn, adding that the steamy pics are ''a celebration of beauty, sexiness and sexuality, and they're a whole lot of fun.''  Boston wedding photographer, Amy Haberland says, ''Boudoir is about art, it's not about getting undressed, but rather you are getting ready to show your best self.''

Although many boudoir clients give these photos to their partners, ''you don't do a boudoir shoot for someone, you do it for you,'' adds Marlow. ''The person posing has taken a bold action that's made them look and feel amazing.''  Doug Barry at Jezebel, has a point by stating, ''Tell that to the people who may unwittingly find the photos in the future. A whole generation of middle-aged adults will be tasked one day with sorting through their recently deceased parent's secret box of stuff which could include a flipbook of mom in various stages of undress and even a pleasant drunkenness!''

The Way I See It....Doug will have to lighten up. I think by that time in the future, our children will be alright with seeing a beautiful mom as they never saw her before; that is, before they were born. Sure, a boudoir session can take some of its cues -- even a lot of its cues -- from a hardcore porn shoot, but the purpose is definitely not the same. It's the joy and love of being a human being. Have a Happy New Year dear followers and be assured that there will be more interesting and revealing blog postings to come.

Now, is the Winter of Our Discontent !

In the last posting you had Dr Audrey H. Krieg's powerful insight into the recent re-election of a Marxist president by a willing, but equally ignorant, lazy, entitlement-hungry electorate. He has shown the concern many have for the direction the American Dream of harmony and self-reliance is going. Those of you who have followed my blog postings for the last three years have been given many insights into politics of government, climate change and even the health industry. At year's end, it might be a good time for me to do look into my crystal ball and see what we can anticipate in the coming four years of Barack Obama's socialist regime. I'll call it Obama's infamous Baker's Dozen!

1. As we have already seen, the Sandy Hook massacre has prompted an outcry that falls into Obama's hands as a mandate to initiate a massive assault on the 2nd amendment through proxies like Californian Democrat Diane Finklestein's Anti-gun Bill. Attacks on the Second Amendment Foundation and the NRA with IRS audits, banning semiautomatic rifles, banning 10+ bullet gun magazines and other draconian issues.
2. The continuation of the Dollar's devaluation through inflation, leading to the end of the Dollar as the world's reserve currency. Additional downgrades of America's credit rating. A probable 30+% inflation rate, gas prices by 2015 of  $8 per gallon. A National Debt by 2016 of $32 trillion!
3. Massive increases of government spending, ignoring the Fiscal Cliff promises, to $1.7 trillion per year. Healthcare costs skyrocketing to a $1 trillion per year. Medical costs for 2011 were $835 billion - they double every seven years. $40 billion monthly mandated spending through 2013 - just printed money backed by nothing.
4. The continued failure of foreign policy through increased violence in the middle East. Further growth of Islamic fundamentalism, the Arab Spring becomes a Arab Winter of Discontent with expansion of an anti-Western takeover of Syria and a war with Iran.
5. Attacks on the Internet and free speech. The development of cybersecurity in the fake support of anti-terrorism with cataloguing every American. Controlling social media and Web content. Restriction of Internet IP's whose allocation will be turned over to an international body.
6. Two more leftist Supreme Court justices turning the Supreme Court into a leftist majority that will internationalize American jurisprudence, destroy what ever is left of the constitution and complete America's journey to socialism.
7. With Habeas Corpus already eliminated and the elimination of the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th 9th and 10th portion of the Bill of Rights through the enactment of the Patriot Act and now NDAA (National Defence Authorization Act) you can expect a massive assault on civil liberties. There will be use of American military to implement government actions. All socialist governments in history that enacted such laws have used them to keep themselves in power.
8. The expansion of power vested in the UN will grow dramatically. The ''Globalist Dynamic'' will oversee the abandonment of American Sovereignty. The International Court at The Hague (in Holland) will gradually replace the Supreme Court and justice will be internationalized.
9. The world's leading secret and semi-secret organizations like CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), TC (Trilateral Commission), Bilderbergers, WEF (World Economic Forum), RIIA (Royal Institute of International Affairs) and others will come to dominate American foreign policy. In Obama's first term the military was politicized, all new flag officers are CFR members, the entire cabinet is CFR, or TC or Bildberger or all three.
10. Reelection rates for Obamacrats will rise from 77% to over 93%. Obamacare will raise medical costs by billions, medical services will continue to decline and free-market options will be eliminated in favor of ever-bigger government. By 2016 the American economy will be in hyperinflation and will start to collapse with a shock-heard-'round-the-world!
11. The regulatory juggernaut that began on the first day of Obama''s reign, will be expanded further to destroy American free enterprise of every sort. Any company successful will be relentlessly attacked by over-regulation. This will further destroy jobs and foster business nationalizations.
12. Green energy, in the form of solar and wind electric energy production, including electric cars, all of which are non-competitive in the marketplace without huge government subsidies (your taxes) will be expanded. These are the very policies that drove Spain to bankruptcy. By wasting billions, they will drive fuel prices up (in spite of the shale gas boom), eliminate coal as a cheap energy source, out goes Alaskan oil production and the Keystone pipeline from Canada forcing Canada to sell to China...reeking havoc to the entire economic system.
13. And on top of all this, Obama will insure a solid voting block in 2016 by Ass-Kissing his Hispanic electorate by declaring amnesty for 25 million illegal immigrants. This will almost immediately be the Coup D'etat to America's viability by bankrupting the entire welfare system, including Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare and Social Security. 

The Way I See It....it doesn't look good for America's future as the shining beacon of freedom and strength built on an economic system that has left other systems on the Trash-Heap-of-History: CAPITALISM. The past year I have delved into what makes Barack Hussein Obama tick and posted my discoveries on a regular basis. That he was steeped into a Marxist upbringing by first by his loony bin mother, his grandparents, a family friend, college buddies, his father's anti-colonialist writings, then leftist professors and Marxist Jews in Chicago. It's in his DNA that he hates what America stands for; its world power and its capitalist system of self-determination and achievement. It's a shame that there were so many dwelling on their regular handouts that they never took much notice of various warnings in so many books, Fox News and conservative press exposing this Marxist creature in there midst and his plans to turn their world upside down. They will have given up their freedom for the easy road of entitlements. Obama is boiling the frog of personal freedom. You've heard the story: By gradually turning up the heat the frog won't notice until too late it is being boiled to death. When civil liberties are taken away gradually, bit by bit, few notice what's happening until too late. It's Over America !!

IT'S OVER ! An Open Letter to the American People

An America Ex-Pat who just returned home from living in Europe, Dr. Audrey H. Krieg says, "I have seen the end of America with the rise of the entitlement society!''  He continues:

       Not many Americans have any experience with socialist governments so let me explain from personal familiarities exactly what you may expect out of the coming four years. Let me make this simple, the same thing happened in England after WW2 resulting in a brain drain when thousands fled England, their home, for nations more accommodating to self-starters. Additionally, the government began a long process of nationalizing industries (Obama's starting with GM, Chrysler and AEG) which resulted in the collapse of many of those industries; producers of wealth. In socialist society, Greece, France Spain and Italy for example, those who fail in life are rewarded, by the fool socialists in charge and all for the sake of ENVY, they produce a society in which all are losers. Socialist governments go belly up when the producer's money is used up.

I have asked myself how could there be so many brainless Americans who don't give a damn about; 23 million unemployed, 47 million food stamps, 25 illegal immigrants, 5 million Green Card holders, a national debt of 16+ trillion, 10 million on welfare, gasoline and foodstuffs doubling in four years? How could our fellow citizens re-elect a president whose entire four-year term was spent playing golf with his idiot vice-president and vacationing with a frequent blaming of others for his created situation and has the nerve to campaign for re-election with the motto FORWARD? How could they forget Fast & Furious, Benghazi and bowing before the king of Saudi Arabia? Do they realize that Obama will most likely appoint two more ultra-leftist Supreme Court Justices? We live in a nation of fools!

In the end, the re-elected president is not the problem so much so that the problem is more that the demographics have changed and the attitude of the electorate has differed. This is no longer my country, or that of my parents, it is a new paradigm, with which I am unfamiliar. America has turned brown and socialist and blaming the lame-stream media is counterproductive. It is an uneducated, lazy and stupid electorate that is to blame, along with the government education that produced it. That is problem to which I can see no immediate solution, because it is not until we reach ''Rock Bottom'' and suffer cold and hunger that we shall see CHANGE!

This election was a divergence of positions and issues directed at specific demographic groups. Obama appealed to blacks, Hispanics, those under 29, government workers, single women, welfare and food stamp recipients and in general terms....takers not creators. The entire campaign was directed at an average intelligence of IQ 85 and the educational level of a fifth grader. Obama was the candidate of the under and un-educated, the stupid and the loafers. Romney took the high road but those underachievers, the non-white and younger shit-for-brains citizens represented a larger societal segment, Romney directed his campaign to those with an IQ of 105 or higher, which population base is not anymore a sufficient size to win. The basic variance is Obama for socialism/communism, Romney for free enterprise, self-reliance and freedom: capitalism. The lazy losers sucking on the teat of government largess will pick socialism/communism every time.

As I said, things will have to get much worse before any change can be achieved. CHANGE only occurs in the lower strata of society when things get so bad that food, electricity, gasoline and shelter becomes the major issues of consideration. When HOPE is lost, then communist propaganda words like FORWARD and Wealth Redistribution are left behind. Anyone suffering from the delusion that Obama's policies will improve the economy had better wake up. From 2009 to 2012 Obama could not even produce a budget that passed his Democrat controlled Senate. The Senate, which will continue under that major deadbeat Harry Reid, also produced no budget in the last three years, will continue to bottle up House legislation even if the Fiscal Cliff is avoided. And this scumbag was also re-elected!

I my opinion Obama will destroy America, which I believe is his plan all along. The actions of the past 5 years all point to a collapse of our economy and the socialization of it, to the benefit of the same elite who control Europe. Queen Victoria's Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli said it best; ''those in elected office are forever the servants of those who provide for their vices.'' Barack Obama is nothing but George Soro's (actually the Jew Geoergi Schwartz) puppet. One of Obama's favorite authors Saul D Alinsky, a hard-core Jewish communist that wrote Rules for Radicals who produced the political strategy Obama is following, to facilitate the destruction of a free economy through bankruptcy caused by overspending. When that happens the ''dog-will-have-its-day'' as Obama and his fetid Marxist government is be thrown out by the very money-grubbing idiots that put him in power.