Bill O'Reilly's Shocking Fractured Historical Fact !

I'm hoping that this posting will be the last to cover the recent Trayvon/Zimmerman incident and the subsequent upsetting of race relations across America. In the many previous postings I have tried to shine the light of reason on the facts and dispel the emotional blindness gripping many black people. After I finished last Monday's posting on the Trayvon/Till comparison this came up. During his otherwise excellent commentaries on race in America, Bill O'Reilly, (photo right) host of the No. 1 cable news show, The O'Reilly Factor (Fox News Channel), claimed last night that the one person who tried to help African-Americans more than any other was....Robert F. Kennedy!

No one laughed and they should have. I guess that's what they're teaching these days at the John F. Kennedy School of Government. (I can't wait to hear how Ted Kennedy helped eradicate drunk driving!) So now, according to O'Reilly's fractured history, Bobby Kennedy was ''the guy who was really concerned about African-Americans'' and ''who really DID SOMETHING. He went in with the federal government and he cleaned out the rat's nest that was abusing blacks in the South.''

Although this myth has been polished to perfection by the Kennedy PR machine (requiring all Kennedy stories to illustrate either courage of adorableness), it is simply a fact that helping blacks was not the Democrat's priority. Even the ones who wanted to, such as Bobby and John Kennedy couldn't risk upsetting the segregationists, more than 90% of whom were Democrats. The job of actually enforcing civil rights and desegregating Southern schools fell to Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon. In May 17th, 1954, the Supreme Court handed down its decision by 9 votes to zero in the Brown v. Board of Education. This ruling was expressly endorsed in the Republican Party platform, but not the Democratic platform.

James Meredith Knows His Rights

Five years after Eisenhower had shown the Democrats how its done by sending federal troops to desegregate Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, President Kennedy and brother Bobby still dragged their feet in helping James Meredith enter the University of Mississippi. On February 7, 1961, Meredith wrote a beautiful letter to the Department of Justice, describing his inability to enrol at the University. He wrote:
          ''Whenever I attempt to reason logically about this matter, it grieves me deeply to realize that an individual, especially an American, the citizen of a free democratic nation, has to clamor with such procedures in order to try to gain just a small amount of his civil and human rights, and even after suffering the embarrassments and personal humiliation of this procedure, there still seems little hope of success.''

The full letter is worth looking up. I would venture to guess there are not many college applicants of any race who write this well today. (You know why?  Because Americans don't read anymore to gain fluency of vocabulary. They watch cable news and fill their heads with nonsense history and false facts.), In response to Meredith's eloquent letter, Bobby Kennedy did nothing. And that's how Bobby Kennedy ''cleaned out the rat's nest that was abusing African-Americans in the South''! So, with the damn Democrats in the White House, Meredith had to take his case to the Supreme Court. Liberals were engaging in their usual massive resistance to court rulings they don't like and neither bobby or JFK would dare to stop them.

Meredith Escorted By Federal Marshalls

In June, 1962, a federal appellate court ordered the university to enrol him, but the segregationists would keep issuing stays to prevent enforcement of the ruling. Only when these stays were appealed to the Supreme Court did Bobby's Justice Department finally get the them lifted -- nearly two years after Meredith had written that letter to him asking for help. But the state would not admit Meredith to ''Ole Miss''. When JFK wrote a letter to the segregationist Democratic governor, Ross Barnett, to follow the courts ruling or face a fine of $10,000 a day, it was ignored. The Kennedy brothers then sent the National Guard in to force the University of Mississippi to admit James Meredith. But the rest of the South remained segregated as long as Bobby Kennedy was Attorney General and either JFK or LBJ was in the White House (LBJ on the 1964 Civil Rights Act: ''I'll have those n*ggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years,'') 

The Way I See It.....the blacks still don't know who their real political friends are and still vote for the Democrats. They may say their hosannas to Bobby Kennedy, but they would have to wait for Republican Richard Nixon to become president to win the full promise of Brown v. Board of Education. There was more desegregation of American public schools in Nixon's first term than in any historical period before or since. It was not an accident that Nixon launched his comeback in 1966 with a Op Ed column denouncing Democrats for trying to ''squeeze the last ounces of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.''  He was so right.

Crediting Bobby Kennedy for the great work he did on behalf of black Americans would be like calling Harry Reid the country's greatest champion of the unborn. Sure, Reid says he's pro-life, but he dare not act on it lest he upset the rest of his party. It was the same with the Democrats and the civil rights issue. If know want to say something nice about Bobby Kennedy, remind everyone that he proudly worked for Sen. Joe McCarthy.

NOTE:  Read my post "Here Come The Closet Black Conservatives !" (August 26, 2012) for
information on a documentary that exposes the Democrat's wish to keep blacks on the ''plantation''.

No Comparison: Trayvon Martin was No Emmett Till !



Emmett Till ---------- Tryvon Martin

The phenomenon is apparent in much of the commentary, especially being promulgated by the ''dynamic-duo'' of race-baiters Messrs Jackson and Sharpton, on the George Zimmerman case. Facts were blithely ignored -- the fact that Zimmerman is Hispanic, not white, by current standards; the evidence that he and not his victim, Trayvon Martin, was pummeled and wounded; the failure to find any hint of anti-black bias in Zimmerman's past. Instead, there was a desperate longing to see this unhappy incident as a case of a white racist hunting down and murdering an innocent black -- with a view to establishing that this kind of thing happens all the time.

It isn't!   Yes, young black men are homicide victims in large and tragic numbers. But the perpetrators are almost always other young black men, as in President Obama's hometown of Chicago, where almost every weekend there are multiple such murders. Nevertheless, journalism is full of opinion articles, many written by people who should know better, like that twit Oprah Winfrey, likening the death of Trayvon to the murder of Emmettt Till in Mississippi in 1955.  The reality is that young Till was a 14 year-old black boy raised in Chicago who, on a summer trip to visit his great-uncle and cousins, came to his native Mississippi Delta region.. It all started when he accompanied them to a grocery store to buy candy. What poor Emmett didn't realize when he crossed the Mississippi state line was that he went back into the 18th Century and his Chicago free-mindedness was in alien territory. He reportedly ''wolf-whistled'' and flirted with the 21-year-old Carolyn Bryant, the married proprietor, and held her hand briefly. Several nights later, Carolyn's husband Roy and his half brother J. Milam arrived at Till's great-uncle's house where they took Emmett, transported him to a barn, beat him and gouged out one of his eyes, before shooting him through the head and disposing of his body in the Tallahatchie River, weighing it with a 70 pound (32 kg) weight around his neck with barbed wire. His body was discovered and retrieved from the river three days later.


ROY BRYANT  and  J. MILAM

The trial attracted a vast amount of press attention. The all-white jury acquitted them of kidnapping and murder after deliberating 67 minutes. Months later, Bryant and Milam, in a Look magazine interview, protected against double jeopardy, admitted that they indeed killed the young man. Till's murder is noted as a pivotal event motivating the African-American Civil Rights Movement. Events surrounding Emmett Till's life and death, according to historians, continue to resonate, and almost every story about Mississippi returns to Till, ''in some spiritual, homing way.''

In the process, Northerners were forced to confront the brutality with which white Southerners enforced the subjection of blacks. This went beyond the laws requiring segregated schools, buses and drinking fountains. Also in place was an unwritten code of behaviour, breach of which could result in violent retaliation. Blacks were called by their first names and could approach white's houses only by the back door, and black men could never, never ogle white women. In fact, from 1895 to 1935 a little more than 500 blacks were murdered in Mississippi alone! You see...this was unknown to most Northerners, as there was almost no migration between South and North in the years between the Civil War and World War II.

Rosa Parks Under Arrest

The great genius of the civil rights movement was to make Northerners face the reality -- and the violence -- of the segregation system. The Emmett Till case was one of the first incidents that forced them to do so. It was followed 10 months later by Rosa Parks' arrest for her refusal to move to the back of the bus and Martin Luther King's resulting Montgomery bus boycott. So it is sometimes said that laws cannot change customs. But the Civil Rights Act of 1964, banning racial discrimination in hiring and public accommodations, did if fact change behaviour in the South. It not only ended legally enforced segregation but effectively ended the unwritten code of black subjugation.

The Way I See It.....the America of our time, the America of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman -- is hugely different from and obviously hugely better than the America of Emmett Till. Back in the 1950's, most Americans -- not only in the south but across the nation -- opposed interracial marriages. Today things are different. President Barack Obama, twice elected with majorities of a cross-section of the voting public, is the product of a mixed-race marriage. Black presence in neighbourhoods no longer results in rapid white flight.

Yet, it seems, many Americans have a desperate need to believe nothing has changed. The irony is that those who claim they lead the civil rights movement today have a vested psychological interest in denying its great triumph by drawing comparison with today's tragedy and spreading the white guilt further and ignoring the black youth crisis in their midst.

King Kevin - The Great Pretender !

In Australia, people cheer Kevin Rudd (the new Prime Minister by default after ''knifing'' the standing PM (Julia Gillard) because they cannot believe he would trick them so brazenly. And never has Rudd - - a genius at ''seeming'', a disaster at doing - been as brazen as last week. King Kevin is a fraud!  He wants Australians to thank him for promising to fix what he's actually smashed. He' figured voters are too stupid to remember what he did, and too lazy to check what he promises to do now. And it's working. Thanks to two extraordinary stunts last week, voters now hail Rudd as the Savior who'll cut the Carbon Tax he in fact voted for, and to stop the illegal aliens in boats he in fact lured to Australia be smashing the previous PM's (John Howard) ''Pacific Solution'' that worked well.

Let's check the reality and not his habit of ''seeming'' to fix the two messes he's made:
NO, he did not ''terminate'' Labor's carbon tax.
NO, his planned emissions trading scheme cannot start next year, or not without spending billions he does not have to buy off the hostile Greens.
NO, he won't save families $380 per year.
NO, your electricity bills might in fact soar, not fall.

The Imperial Conga-Line of Ambassadors

In fact, Rudd will be the second prime minister to go to an election promising ''there will be no carbon tax under the government I lead.'' If re-elected he will be the second Labor prime minister to claim ''changed circumstances'' made him break his solemn word.

So, to begin his week, King Kevin invited all the ambassadors, representing every Embassy, to the Prime Minister's residence for a cup of tea, a biscuit and an introductory chat. When they started arriving they weren't led inside but were told to wait until all of the ambassadors arrived and had them assemble on the front drive. It was then that he and his wife opened the door and each ambassador was led, one by one, to come forward and introduce themselves and shake Rudd's hand and then was shown inside. It suited Rudd's known imperial attitude and love of grandstanding.

Then last Tuesday, he made the following false claims or almost certainly undeliverable promises in announcing he'd move to an emissions trading scheme a year earlier than Labor planned saying that ''the Government has decided to terminate the carbon tax. By that, modelling from treasury shows that next year an average family will receive a cost-of-living relief to the value of $380 per year. We expect the change that we are bringing in will see the price on carbon fall from $25.40 a tonne by next July to $6 a tonne.''  Not one of those claims can be trusted. Some are outright fabrications. Rudd is dead wrong in claiming his change would save families $380 per year, as he stated FIVE times on Tuesday. Rudd is merely bringing forward by one year the switch to emissions trading, so any savings are also for just one year. Then the following year the EU plans to increase the carbon price to perhaps double the $6 and in a few more years we might not be saving but spending a more.

Next, let's remember, at his first go as Prime Minister in 2008, King Kevin scrapped the tried-and-true tough border laws by the previous Liberal government which had cut boat arrivals to an average of just three (3) a year. Since then more than 45,000 boat people mostly from lovely Muslim countries like the Sudan, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Sri Lanka have come to Australia, and more than 1000 have been lured to their deaths. Last week another thirteen boat people drowned. With blood on his hands and an election coming up he finally stopped talking about fixing the lethal disaster he caused and put Australian's tax money where his mouth was. He's bribing another country to fix it.

On Thursday, King Kevin announced he has made a boat-people-deal with the Papua New Guinean government to open the Manus Island detention centre. The construction of the detention centre was announced last year and is still six months away with room for just 600 asylum seekers. Rudd boldly stated to the press with members of the PNG government ministers behind him, ''From now on, any asylum seeker who arrives in Australia by boat will have no chance of being settled in Australia as refugees. Asylum seekers taken to Christmas Island will be sent to Manus Island and elsewhere in PNG for assessment of their refugee status.''  but the published ''agreement'' does not guarantee all what Rudd claims. The deal is for just 12 months. It does not oblige PNG to take all boat people sent from Australia. It makes such people only ''liable'' to being transferred to Papua New Guinea.

PNG even suggests there will be a ''cap'' on the number of people it will take. Foreign Minister Rimbink Pato told The Australian newspaper ''the arrangement'' was open-ended but he also signalled the potential to put brakes on its scope over time. ''We are not putting any cap on any numbers just yet, because we want to work through jointly to establish at what point in time what brakes Australia will put on and what brakes PNG will put on. The deal does not oblige PNG to resettle any boat people not to be actual refugees.''  If PNG won't resettle non-refugees, Australia may have to take them back--or find them some other home not yet identified. PNG made it clear that it was willing to resettle asylum-seekers who were given refugee status but for those that failed that test, they would be kept in detention if no other countries agreed to accept them. Of course they could always go back home on their own accord.

The Way I See It.....Kevin Rudd's supercharged ''Pacific Solution'' has all the hallmarks of an election quick fix...this solution...with an election looming is redolent of political opportunism. Somehow, amid his usual posturing and policy-changing, the most important human aspect is in danger of costing Australian taxpayers a fortune. This deal seems to offer life-time support from Australia for any refugees resettled in PNG under this arrangement, which could prove attractive to future illegal aliens. Kevin's description of this last obligation that slipped under the media radar was,  ''......the Australian Government, in support of the PNG Government, will provide comprehensive settlement services to ensure that these refugees can live safely and with security and in time, prosper within PNG.''

King Kev figures voters are too stupid to remember what he did, the first time around, and they now blindly backing him to deliver hasty, vague and massively expensive fixes. They're forgetting this is the same ''psychopath'' (as his fellow Minister's called him) who botched so many grand plans -- including his free insulation disaster (4 installers died), 8 billion dollars in the school halls blowout and the Grocery and Fuel Watch shambles. People with short memories may find it unbelievable that a prime minister could tell them such untruths with such moral conviction. The constant Cheshire Cat grin should've given it away, but Rudd has long traded on ''seeming'' something he is not. He is a genius at seeming to fix what he's actually broken and then the negative, not-well-thought-out consequences come home to roost. We have seen it all before where this King of Seeming was shown to be wearing no clothes.  Only morons remain blind to his phony personality.

''Crackergate'', Holder, Obama and the Trayvon Saga !

I was hoping not to write anymore postings on the racially charged Zimmerman/Trayvon case. However, in the last 48 hours more stupidity, including the demonstrations, has become public.



Chris Mathews with Humble-Face

Firstly, a clear case of Negrophilia (as explained in my previous blog posting) was demonstrated by a news anchor on MSNBC, Chris Matthews, who apparently believed he has the platform to speak about the death of Trayvon Martin. He looked into the camera and got all humble in voice and face and said, ''I'm speaking for ALL WHITE PEOPLE....and I'm sorry for this stuff.''  Stuff??  You mean the stuff of a Hispanic man trying to defend himself from severe injury from a tall, 17 year old aggressive Negro teenager who was beating him up on the ground?  That stuff ?  Or, as White people we collectively must feel guilty that this deadshit kid (not unarmed but with strong arms itching to fight) was shot?  Mr Matthews you should get Bill Cosby on your show and listen to his oft expressed opinion of these teenage punks bred by lazy, no-account men and careless, no-account women.

Then on Friday Americans heard President Barack Obama, their Race-Baiter-in-Chief, remark on the Trayvon tragedy, saying, ''Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago.'' and then saying the outcome might have been different if Trayvon had been white was reprehensible. President Obama is often deliberately divisive; culture wars and straw men have been his friends these five years. "Divide and conquer'' is a political method, after all -- if you can keep people screaming at each other and hating each other with trumped-up ''wars on women'' and talk of ''fat cats with private jets'' -- they're not paying attention to the fact that the government is tracking their every move. Was this yet another attempt to keep the house divided?

Arguably, American race relations have deteriorated ever since the election of Obama. The President and his cabinet and troop of Czars continuous playing of the race card for political opportunism has become an American staple. And many dumb whites still don't see they're being played. Eric Holder is the president's point man on this issue, and has become so bellicose that decent people can't stand to listen to him any longer. The continuous support of racial hucksters like Sharpton and Jackson by Holder, the president and the media and their minions are shameful and un-American. These people are in it for the profit, re-election and fame...not justice and truth.

Race-Baiters with a 12 year-old Trayvon photo !

It seems that the entire Negro community is obsessed with this issue, notwithstanding the mainstream media's preoccupied propagandizing of all Black vs White matters. The fact that Zimmerman is half Hispanic seems also have been lost in translation. After all, progressives (Leftists & Democrats) would not want to see a confrontation between the two largest minorities on which they bought with welfare cheques and count on for re-election. The recent murder of an infant by two Negro teenagers, in an effort to extort the White mother to give them money, was not only missed by Jackson and Sharpton but also by the press, Holder and Obama. The fact that Martin referred to Zimmerman as a ''White Cracker'', certainly a racist term, also seems to have disappeared down the sinkhole of history.

Now we finally learn that good old Eric, you remember Fast & Furious, and his media cronies are about to tie the case into another attempt a gun control legislation and Florida's ''bizarre gun laws.'' The overturning of Florida's Stand-Your-Ground law, that by the way has nothing at all to do with this case, allows you to face your assailant without fear and the right to protect yourself is not only the law in 37 states...it is also Constitutionally legitimate in all states. Holder knows this and Gov. Rick Scott says he's not going to change it. These scumbag progressives believe that it is bizarre for a homeowner to be allowed to protect his home and family, and that if faced by a violent assailant; getting a broken nose and fractured skull (like Zimmerman) you must not in law shoot the bastard (most of them are) but run away, that is if you are young enough to do so. This is stupid logic!

It is also quite apparent that the real facts in the case must not be allowed to interfere with the political and media agenda. Little issues like using five year-old photos of Martin at age 12, in reporting, omitting the use of Marijuana by Martin, not allowing the reporting in court of three school expulsions, police records, and violent behaviour to the jury. I have seen recent pictures of Martin tattoo laden, stripped to the waist making rude finger gestures on the Internet. These pictures including one at a store in which he towers over the Hispanic clerk that certainly conflicts with the media ''choirboy'' portrait of Martin. And the attempt to change the charges to manslaughter on the last day of the trial is unprecedented in American jurisprudence. It was a failed ''All-American Show Trial'' that was no different from the Soviet ones.

While Sharpton and Jackson screech of racial inequity; they flatly refuse to address the real issue of WHY. As of this month 85% of all black children are born out of wedlock. Statistically crime out of wedlock born children is over 20 times that of those with fathers. A majority of gang members come from fatherless families; while 60% are rapists. You get what you pay for! The existing welfare system rewards women to have illegitimate children by paying them more for each child; if she gets married she loses all that. The Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program increased the number of illegitimate births by 43% . Let's be honest, black on black crime is the real problem with Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans, St Louis and Memphis topping the list and each of these cities has been run by progressive Democrats for decades. Putting it another way, since the Martin/Zimmerman incident, 2,992 Blacks have been murdered by other Blacks in just 14 progressive Democrat run cities. It says it all, doesn't it?

The Way I See It.....with a White population four times that of Blacks, and yet Blacks are responsible for 50.5% of all murders, while only 8% of Blacks were murdered by Whites, there is an illogical emphasis by progressives on blaming lack of gun-control and a prejudiced judicial system. In a previous blog posting last year I pointed out that FBI statistics indicate that guns and semi-automatic rifles commit only 2.6% of murders, when in fact knives, fists, and dull instruments are more common in murder cases. Our problem is not guns or judicial injustice but FIVE I will list:

1. Illegitimacy and the absenteeism of fathers.
2. A social welfare system that rewards illegitimacy.
3. The lack of enforcement of existing gun possession laws.
4. The lack of socially directed Moral and Ethical teaching and Religion in Public Schools.
5. A political callousness that has no interest in solving the problem because it relies on the problem to create an ever-expending dependency in communities to support re-election campaigns.

America's problem, to put it bluntly, is one of political and social liberalism (called progressivism)  that will find the dynamic freedom loving country of the United States progressively slipping into a style of European Union socialism that will stifle individual ambitions for mediocre achievement and with higher taxes to pay for it.

Zimmerman Trial Exposes ''Negrophilia'' in the United States !

A bizarre and baffling condition has seized American society and is spreading in pandemic proportions. But no one dare utter its name because this sickness is rooted in the most vulgar of four-letter words....RACE. So charges a new book by author Erik Rush, who doesn't refrain from using the new N-word ''Negrophilia'' -- ''undue and inordinate affinity for blacks embracing the myth of the noble savage''.  This describes the mindset that Rush says is behind a pervasive manipulation expertly employed and exploited to divide and destroy American society.

No stranger to brash actions, Rush, who's black, sparked a national fervor when he came forth to expose the anti-American ravings of President Obama's longtime minister and then ''spiritual adviser,'' the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. He states in his new book, (right)Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal - America's Racial Obsession, ''Whites succumb to Negrophilia when, believing that people of color are somehow more benevolent and less corruptible than themselves, they develop an undue affinity for them.'' He added, ''Blacks suffer worse. They're denied accountability for their own actions. They're shackled with accepting the nobility--no matter how lacking-- of all black 'leaders.' They're ripe for the 'rescue' of predatory, opportunistic members of the black community--in concert with white politicians scheming for personal enrichment.'' Nowhere was the influence of Negrophilia more evident than during the presidential campaign of ''post-racist'' Barack Obama which Rush describes in detail in his book.

The Justice-for-Trayvon crowd keeps pretending there hasn't been a trial where the evidence overwhelmingly showed that Trayvon committed the first (and only) crime that night by assaulting Zimmerman. Instead, the race agitators are sticking with the original story peddled by the media, back when they, and we, had zero facts. To wit, that Zimmerman had stalked a young black ''child'' and shot him dead for being black and wearing a hoodie. Journalist and political commentator,Ann Coulter relates dozens of stories like this in her book, Mugged: Racial Demagoguery From the Seventies to Obama. In the golden age of racial demagoguery, they came about one a year. That prick Al Sharpton was usually involved.



A normal person would hear some of the more outlandish allegations and think, ''I can't believe it!'' not meaning, ''Wow! What a blockbuster story!'' but rather, I would like to hear the facts because I literally don't believe it.''  (That was much of America's reaction to the media's claim last year that a neighbourhood-watchman in Florida had hunted down a black teenager and shot him dead for wearing a hoodie.) Whenever a much-celebrated claim of racism turned out to be false -- which was almost always -- you'd just stop hearing about it. There would never never be a clippable story admitting that the media's harrumphing had been in error. No...''Attention, readers! That story we've been howling about for several months turned out to be a complete fraud ! ''  Journalists are incapable of learning that they should get all the facts before launching moral crusades.

In her book ''Mugged'', Ms Coulter mentions a similar case like Zimmerman's. It involved Edmund Perry. In 1985, Perry, a black teenager from Harlem who had just graduated from Phillips Exeter Academy, mugged a guy who turned out to be an undercover cop. He got shot and a few hours later was dead. Instead of waiting for the fats, the media rushed out the story about Officer Lee Van Houten being a trigger-happy, racist cop. When that turned out to be false, The New York Times looked at its shoes and said nothing. It was the kind of story the leftist elites wanted to be true. It should be true. We has such high hopes for that one. Damn!

The initial news accounts stressed not only that Perry was a graduate of Exeter, but that he was unarmed. A few weeks after the shooting, The New York Times called Perry ''a prized symbol of hope.'' (sic!) It went on to say that ''all New Yorkers have big reasons to wish for the innocence of the young man who was killed.'' I doubt very much that Van Houten being accused of being a murderous racist hoped for that. The Village Voice stupidly wrote: ''Like so many other victims in this city, Perry was just too black for his own good." Luckily for the policeman, Perry had mugged him in a well-lit hospital parking lot. Twenty-three witnesses backed the officer's story in testimony to the Grand Jury while there were a half dozen for Zimmerman.. (Unlike Zimmerman, Van Houten's case was at least presented to the Grand Jury.) But the evidence overwhelmingly corroborated his story.

Make your own Judgement

In Van Houten's case, even after it was blindly clear that Perry had mugged him, the truth was only revealed amid great sorrow. When the facts were unknown, the cop was racist. When it turned out Perry had really mugged the cop, the Negrophilia kicked in with the media saying ''it was no one's fault,'' but a problem of ''violence'' and of ''two worlds colliding.'' Perhaps, someday, blacks will win the right to be treated like volitional human beings. But not yet. After the Grand Jury refused to indict Van Houten an idiot, Dorothy Gaiter of the Miami Herald wrote in an article titled ''To Be Black and Male is Dangerous in the U.S.'' She asked: ''How do you teach a boy to be a man in a society where others may view him as a threat just because he is black?''

The Way I See It.....Ms Gaiter.....to avoid looking like a criminal, don't commit a crime. Van Houten, like Zimmerman, was jumped on, knocked to the ground, punched and kicked by by Edmund Perry. Isn't it possible that Van Houten saw Perry as a threat for reasons other than ''just because he is black.'' And please stop the media from talking about Martin's ''hoodie''! Zimmerman wasn't worried about the hoodie; he was worried about being beaten to death by a tall Negro kid.

Instead of turning every story about a black person killed by a white person into an occasion to announce, ''The simple fact is, America is a racist society,'' liberals might, one time, just ask the question: ''Why do you suppose there would be a generalized fear of young black males? What might that be based on?  WE ARE NOT STUPID! It's because a disproportionate number of criminals are young black males. It just happens that when Lee Van Houten and George Zimmerman were mugged by two of them, they survived the encounter. So the Negro community should just SUCK IT UP !!!

Are You Eating This ''Cancer-in-a Can'' Snack ?

Yes....I'm writing about the ubiquitous Pringles. To understand the nature of Pringles and other stackable chips, forget the notion that they come from actual potatoes in any recognizable way.
The Pringles Company (in an effort to avoid taxes levied against ''luxury foods'' like chips in the UK) once even argued that the potato content of their chips was so low that they are technically not even potato chips!

So if they are not made of potatoes, what are they exactly?  Well...the process begins with a slurry of rice, wheat, corn, and potato flakes that are pressed into shape. This dough-like substance is then rolled out into an ultra-thin sheet cut into chip-cookies by a machine. The chips move forward on a conveyor belt until they're pressed onto molds, which give them the curve that makes them fit into one another. Those molds move through boiling oil, are then blown dry, sprayed with powdered flavours, and at last flipped onto a slower conveyor belt in a way the allows them to stack. From then on, it's into the cans....and off towards the innocent mouths of the consumers.

I hate to tell you this, as we all grew up loving the taste of potato chips, but they are clearly one of the most toxic processed foods you can eat--whether they're made from actual potatoes or not. Actually, one of the most hazardous ingredients in potato chops is not intentionally added, but a by-product of the processing. ACRYLAMIDE, a cancer-causing and potentially neurotoxic chemical, is created when carbohydrate-rich foods are cooked at high temperatures, whether baked, fried, roasted or toasted. Some of the worst offenders include potato chips and French fries, but many foods cooked or processed at temperatures above 212 degrees F (100C) may contain acrylamide. The chemical is formed when food is heated enough to produce a fairly dry and brown/yellow surface.

If you think you can avoid the health risks of potato chips by choosing baked varieties, which are typically advertised as being ''healthier'' think again. Remember, that acrylamide is formed not only when foods are fried or broiled, but also when they are baked. And according to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data on acrylamide levels in foods, baked chips may contain more than three times the level of acrylamide as regular chips!  Interestingly, the same trend holds true for other foods, too, which suggests that baking processed potatoes at high temperature may be one of the worst ways to cook them. So keep in mind, that ALL potato chips contain acrylamide, regardless of whether they are natural or not, baked or fried. Likewise, they will ALL influence your insulin levels in a very negative way.

A three-year long EU project, known as Heat-Generated Food Toxicant (HEATOX), published findings that discovered that you are far less likely to ingest dangerous levels of the toxin when you eat home-cooked foods compared to industrially or restaurant prepared foods. Additionally, the HEATOX findings also suggested that although there are ways to decrease exposure to acrylamide, it cannot be eliminated completely. However, like a modern-day search for the Holy Grail, chip manufacturers keep searching for methods to improve the image of their health-harming but profitable snacks. For example, since 2011, about half of Pepsi's potato chip range of snacks has been reformulated with all-natural ingredients. The reformulated chips may end up being less bad for you than the original originals but chips will never be truly healthful. All-natural chips may be the lesser of the two evils.

The Way I See It.....if you consume this snack foods regularly, they will still push your health in the wrong direction. There's no getting away from the fact that modern plagues such as cancer, heart disease, obesity, and diabetes have a dietary component, and potato chips and French fries will always be a losing bet if you want to avoid becoming another disease statistic. By opting for foods that will benefit your health, such as raw, preferably organic and/or locally-grown vegetables, grass-fed meats, healthy oils (rice & coconut), nuts and seeds, you can  change your health for the better.

Remember, eating fresh whole foods is the ''secret'' to getting healthier, losing weight and really enjoying your food. It's unfortunate that so many are under the mistaken belief that it's ''next to impossible'' to create a meal without processed foods. Bruce Weinstein and Mark Scarbrough tackle this issue head-on in their book Real Food Has Curves (Simon & Shuster), which is a great starting point to ''relearn'' the basics of how to enjoy and prepare real food. Once you get used to it, you'll find you can whip up a healthy meal from scratch in the same amount of time it would have taken you to drive down the street to pick up fast food. The main difference will be greater satisfaction, both physically and mentally, and perhaps even financially, as processed foods typically end up being more expensive than cooking from scratch.

A Simple Case of Self Defence by a Small Man Becomes a Federal Case !

Zimmerman's Broken Nose

With mobs of Negros going berserk around the U.S.A. over the Not Guilty verdict in the George Zimmerman case once again shows their one-eyed view of the law. Once again playing the Victim Card  to its fullest. The press didn't help by portraying Zimmerman, a member of his community's Neighbourhood Watch, (in Sanford, Florida) as a ''white Hispanic'' and another detail obscured by media organizations preferring to show pictures of the dead Trayvon Martin when he was much younger, smaller and childlike. The decision to bring charges against him was based on politics; the racial bias of Barack Obama and Eric Holder rather than the facts.

People appear to have forgotten that when race first became a factor in this case it was because for six weeks after the shooting, Zimmerman was neither arrested nor charged. The story that a bruised George Zimmerman told about his fight with Trayvon never had anything to do with Florida's so-called Stand Your Ground law when attacked inside his gated community. Zimmerman saw Martin acting suspiciously, called the police, and while waiting for their arrival, confronted him. He was knocked down by a young Negro who was four inches taller than him and considered himself an expert fighter. I'm pretty sure that the vast majority of people had no idea that Martin was sitting on top of Zimmerman, punching him in the face, breaking his nose and banging his head (photo left) into the pavement. In desperation Zimmerman shot the scumbag. ''It was purely a matter of self-defence,'' said Police Chief Bill Lee.

Team Obama sent the FBI to investigate the shooting and they concluded: No racial element, and in fact no crime period. End of story, right? Nope, just the beginning. Obama and Holder say to themselves, ''That's not the narrative we want'' and send several hundred Department of Justice (DOJ) employees on the ''Taxpayer's Dime'' to Sanford. They organized several rallies inviting folks like the legendary deadshits like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and the Black Panthers. Actual DOJ employees during the rallies proclaim ''Zimmerman is a Racial Motivated Murderer!'' Obama states to the media, "If I had a boy...he would look like Trayvon.'' and adds to the racial emotions. Then abuses the power of the Oval Office to fire the Police Chief and the State's Attorneys, not to mention taking the case away from the Sanford police.

A political hack Angela Corey is appointed ''Special Prosecutor''.  She circumvents the process, does not go to a Grand Jury, instead just files charges....facts and prior investigations be damned. A trial that should never have happened, goes on. Both sides present their evidence, give closings and the jury gets the case to decide. The jury returns a Not Guilty verdict, end of story right? No, not when you hear the jaw-dropping statement prosecutor Corey in a TV show interview and said, ''Zimmerman is still a murderer!''  Not with all the expectation of a lynching fuelled by Jackson, Sharpton and Team Obama. So we have the riots, the death threats; even to Zimmerman' mother and father. Nothing is too low for these lowlife blacks to say and do when their thirst for blood isn't slaked. Even Holder has the nerve to hint that he may take it to a higher court. This leads most decent Americans to ask, ''Who the hell are the Real Racists?''  It's time for a frank discussion.


Hack Prosecutor Corey

Some of these thoughts about America's real ''racial divide'' were brought out by a black journalist, Jason Riley, this week. He mentioned that an candid debate on race and criminality in the US would have to start with fact that blacks commit an astoundingly disproportionate number of crimes. African-Americans (I hate that term--you don't see me going around saying I'm a German-American) constitute about 13% of the population, yet between 1976 and 2006 blacks committed more than half of all the murders  the US. The black arrest rate for most offences -- including robbery, aggravated assault and property crimes -- is typically 2-3 times their representation in the population.

''High rates of black violence in the late 20th Century are a matter of historical fact, not bigoted imagination,'' wrote the late Harvard Law professor William Stuntz in The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. ''The trends reached their peak not in the land of Jim Crow (the South) but in the more civilised North, and not in the age of segregation but in the decades that saw the rise of civil rights for Blacks -- and of the Blacks control of city governments. It seems civil rights didn't bring along civil responsibility.'' The stupid Left wants to blame these outcomes on racial animus and ''the system,'' but blacks have long been a part of running that system. Black crime and incarceration rates spiked in the 1970s and 80s in such cities as Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago and Philadelphia, under black mayors and black police chiefs. Some of the most violent cities today are run by incompetent blacks.

The Way I See It.....the homicide rate claiming black victims today is seven times that of whites, and the George Zimmermans of this world are not the reason. About 90% of black murder victims are killed by other blacks. Did the perception of black criminality play a role in Martin's death?  We may never know for certain, but we do know that those negative perceptions of young black men are rooted in hard data on who commits crimes. We also know that young black men will not change how they are perceived until they change how they behave. Ditch the Hoody and get a job. Enough said!