We Have a Problem With the Sudanese !

Now, I have to speak out! A year ago, in early May, I sent a concerned email to Mr Akoch Manheim, Director of the Sudanese Lost Boys Association (based in Melbourne), about information I had accumulated over the course of a year concerning Sudanese gang violence. I told him my patients and their neighbors are having a gut-full and will look to straightening these thugs out if something's not done! All I got from my troubled message was a short reply that he would need a couple of weeks to look into it. I figured that with 22,000 of them scattered across our lovely land it could take time. I never got answer back even after repeated attempts to elicit a response.


I initially mentioned my brother-in-law's warning to my wife and I not to stroll down the street at night from our hotel in Perth's CBD as we were very likely to be set upon and mugged by Sudanese men loitering in parks along the main street. He even pointed them out lurking in the shadows that put a chill up our spines. I then told Mr Manheim that just 4 weeks later a patient of mine visiting Perth for a business conference was walking the 3 blocks back to the same hotel and was attacked by 6 Sudanese. They held him down and groped for his wallet, then as a police car rounded the corner; off they fled. I included my angry and bruised patient's remark saying, "Those Bl--k B--tards nearly killed me!" for emphasis.


I went on to list incidents that were occurring all over Australia. In Adelaide last year, four people were stabbed after a beauty pageant over a brawl off Rundle Street involving about 100 members of the Sudanese community. A few months later, in another incident, a 14 year old gang member was charged with murder. Melbourne and Sydney both had their share of gang fights, vandalism and violence to Australians. And here in Brisbane we have 4 groups of them in Annerley, Stones Corner, Cooparoo and Collingwood Park and now poor Toowoomba has them too! Police in each area report shop stealing, accosting women, vandalism and an intimidating behavior by Sudanese youths. Are these the LOST BOYS Mr Manheim tells us are just trying to rebuild their lives? Yes..at our countrymen's expense I might add.


You would think he would show more concern and try to do something. Well, the something he did do was show my sincere email to some social worker, who typically showed no concern for my evidence but she took to calling me a racist for putting my patient's remark in the message. Do you believe this man couldn't not write me first and discuss the strong way I presented my evidence. Well, his people are at it again! Andrew Bolt's website has listed some offences.


Easter weekend in southeast Melbourne had 2 men being injured with a machete and metal chain during a wild brawl that erupted after another beauty pageant. More than 1000 members of the Sudanese community had gathered at a public hall. Police arrived to find a large group fighting each other in the street. Officers were pelted with bottles and had to call for back-up. It took 12 police units and 3 dog-squads two hours to bring the violence under control. In 2007, a young man was stabbed after a brawl at a beauty pageant party involving 700 people in Dandenong. Seems these people are developing some bad habits! The list goes on.

Also this weekend in Darwin, two teenage boys were wounded with a machete while a third was beaten unconscious. Residents of the quiet Wulagi street described the attackers as African.

April 15: In Adelaide, 2 incidents of women being indecently assaulted by black men, one at her home and the other in the toilet of a Hindley Street nightclub.


April 14: In Shepparton, 3 armed black men terrorised two staff members in a brazen attack at a Subway restaurant at 9:30pm. They were armed with a baseball bat and knife.


April 13: In Melbourne, a man was stabbed in the head while he walked through a residential car park at 6:40pm. The 2 attackers were African and in their teens.


April 10: Also Melbourne, while walking home from a party, two men were seriously stabbed in brawl when they came upon another group of men in their late teens and early 20's about 1:30am. An argument erupted and the men carrying the knives were Africans.


April 6: Melbourne police are seeking two Africans in their late-20s with short black hair after an unprovoked stabbing in Footscray at 7:45pm. A man called out to the victim to get his attention as a second man lunged from at him from bushes and stabbed him in the shoulder and then in the back.


April 2: In Canberra, a 19 year old is recovering in hospital after being stabbed in the abdomen. At 1:45am the victim and his 18 year old friend were walking down a street in Belconnen when they noticed a man following them. When questioned about his behavior the black African rushed them and stabbed his friend in the arm and him in the abdomen.


This is just a partial, but alarmingly long list of brawls, sexual assaults and stabbings in Australia involving offenders of African appearance in JUST ONE MONTH! Good old Akoch Manheim hides himself behind a Politically Correct Social Worker while this insult to Aussie kindness goes on. You may contact him with your opinion of the actions of his ungrateful community at his email address: akoch20@yahoo.com.

The Way I See It....I wonder at the irresponsibility of our Immigration Department in thinking people from such a vastly different and troubled culture could fit in without undue trouble. Chris Bowen has a lot to answer for his cock-eyed view of multiculturalism. Inviting people with limited English language skills, many not even familiar with the Roman & Arabic alphabet with no formal qualifications or skills. They will need a lot of our resources to assist them in every way of living here. Not wanting them here is not Racist, but Realistic. However, you don't see any African country willing to take them, do you? Why? Read on.

Try this one on. It was brought to my attention a few months ago that the Scouting Organization of Australia focused on establishing a special scout troop for the blacks in Toowoomba. The desire was to stop the rampant breaking & entering and vandalism offenses by giving this bunch a constructive outlet for their unsocial energies. So, at the first meeting to get the Troop started, blacks were introduced to each other when a yell rang out from the Sudanese teenagers, "We won't be going to any meeting if these Rwandans are going to be here!" Do you believe this black-to-black reverse racism?? It's enough to make this old "whitey" cringe. Maybe Sixty Minutes would like to run a story.


Seriously, I must ask...has the desire to seem nice once more overwhelmed our government's responsibility to be wise? How smart was it to offer such people a home in Australia, so remote in so many ways? How fair was it to do so, given how this would affect Australians themselves? Would it have not been more effective help to work harder to provide safe havens and support in their homeland? Have we offered anywhere enough of the support such people would need to settle in without harm to themselves or their new neighbours? I think there will be a day of reckoning if this isn't fixed pretty soon...DO YOU HEAR US Akoch?

The Global Recanting of Multiculturalism: Part 2

I really cringe when I hear politicians talk of MULTICULTURALISM in the context of the immigrants living in their country. They are doing their citizens a disservice by promoting this concept to the world's migratory peoples. This why the European countries are now confronted with the possibility of becoming EUR-ARABIA. Thankful, as you read in my last posting, they are doing something about addressing the complete indifference these migrants show in not assimilating with their host country's values, culture and even language.

The more correct word should be MULTIRACIAL in the context of having mixed races living in one's country but strictly mandating that these people accept and absorb the culture of that country with all its ramifications and rewards. To tolerant anything less is inviting disaster both socially and morally to the fabric of that original society.

So in Australia, last month, we hear our Immigration Minister Chris Bowen fob off the misgivings and concern of the European countries to their immigrant's non-assimilation by saying, "They may be having second thoughts about their multicultural policies but here in Australia, multiculturalism is doing well in all its aspects." REALLY Mr Bowen? Let me read you a letter sent to the Herald Sun newspaper, from a Greg Sheridan.

In 1993, my family and I moved into Belmore in southwest Sydney. It is the next suburb to Lakemba. When I moved there I loved it. On the other side of Belmore, away from Lakemba, there were lots of Chinese, plenty of Koreans, growing numbers of Indians and on the Lakemba side lots of Lebanese and Arabs. That was an attraction, too. I like Middle Eastern food. I like Middle Eastern people and liked the Asian influence as well. But in the nearly 15 years we lived there, the suburb changed and much for the worse.

Three dynamics interacted in a noxious fashion: the growth of a macho, misogynist culture among young men that often found expression in extremely violent crime: a pervasive atmosphere of anti-social behaviour in the streets: and the simultaneous growth of Islamist extremism and jihadi culture. I was shocked to discover the growth of this despicable jihadi culture in Lakemba.

One day, waiting for a pizza order, I wandered into the Muslim bookshop. I was astounded to see titles such as The International Jew and The truth about the Pope amid a welter of other anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and pro-extremist literature. I remembered that a large number of those charged with terrorism offences in Australia stayed in or had associations within the area. I also recalled the brilliant and fearless reporting of this paper's Richard Kerbaj, who spoke perfect Arabic and exposed that in a number of mosques in the area outright hatred was being preached: anti-Semitic, misogynist and conspiratorial being the prime subjects.

The advent of satellite television made it easier for these folks to live a life apart from us. Hezbollah's Al Manar TV station was available on satellite packages. Most Arab homes you went into had Arabic TV playing in the background as children were playing. Just imagine the next bunch of anti-social behaviour we'll be facing as these people keep breeding and their brood grows up.

The Way I See It....Chris Bowen, MP had better wake up, take off those Rose-Coloured Glasses and seriously take-the-hint from our European friends and the Congressional hearings taking place in the United States because all is not well in Gotham City. Aside from his government's inadequate Boat People policy (which was covered in a previous posting) he must not let the Muslims turn our democratic system against us by enjoying the privilege of disseminating their filthy ideas in book stores and mosques without consequences; like DEPORTATION.

I would also like see careful monitoring of the books in the Islamic schools that are sprouting up. And let's not give into the the cry of "victimization" through our actions. First and foremost, if those Muslim communities in this country can't police themselves and expose the underlying jihadi conspirators then we'll have to scrutinize them more closely. After all, it's our culture, language and values they need to absorb to enjoy a free aussie way of life. If they don't like it....LEAVE!!!

The Global Recanting of Multiculturalism

I first wrote about the unfilled promise of Europe's multiculturalism in my blog posting in October last year. In that article I pointed out that Angela Merkel, Germany's leader, publicly announced that multiculturalism was dead in her country and the welcome mat was withdrawn from people that continue to refuse to assimilate and enjoy German culture and language; particularly the Muslims.

A few months ago, the British Prime Minister David Cameron delivered a cogent and impassioned speech on the perils of political correctness and multiculturalism in his country. He was specifically highlighting the need to combat Islamic extremism. He told his audience, "We won't defeat terrorism simply by the actions we take outside our borders. Europe needs to wake up to what is happening in our own countries. Under the doctrine of state multiculturalism, we have encouraged different cultures to live separate lives, apart from the mainstream. We have foolishly tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run counter to our values.

Cameron continued, "So when a white person holds racist views, we rightly condemn them. But when equally unacceptable views or practices have come from someone who isn't white, we've been too cautious frankly, even fearful, to stand up to them." He said, "All too often we have been showering organizations with public money that purport to represent the Muslim community only to find that they do little to combat extremism in their ranks. Frankly, we need a lot less of the passive tolerance of recent years and much more active, muscular liberalism!" After he heard Cameron's speech, Niclos Sarkosy renewed has efforts to get a "ban-the-barqa" law passed and now women can be fined if in full-dress burqa.

Meanwhile in March, many politicians in America see multiculturalism. especially its coddling of Islam, as a tremendous threat and see what lessons the Europeans have learnt in their passive tolerance of multiculturalism. Now, in Washington, Representative Peter King has called for Congressional hearings on the threat of Islamic extremism within the United States. King said to his leftist detractors, "In short, our homeland has become a major front in the war with Islamic terrorism. Very simply, my committee cannot ignore the fact that al-Qaeda is actively attempting to recruit individuals living within the Muslim American community to commit acts of terror. This committee will continue to examine the threat of Islamic radicalization and I will not allow political correctness to obscure a real and dangerous threat to the safety and security of our citizens...point blank!"

The Way I See It....most western countries are waking up to the fact that their generous tolerance of Muslims in their midst has not generated an assimilation and acceptance of their country's values. Instead in many cities in Europe there are actually "pockets" (really ghettos) of Muslims that have created NO GO ZONES where white people, police, firemen and even ambulances are rebuked and threatened. These people were even allowed to set up their own neighbourhood Sharia courts and not comply with local laws. Finally the citizens are saying, "Enough is enough."

Who Are We Fighting For ?

On March 20th, in Florida. Pastor Terry Jones conducted a mock trail of the Koran "for crimes against humanity" and set it ablaze. Few bothered to notice. But Hamid Karzai did.

On March 24th, this president of Afghanistan, the West's ratbag ally in the war with even worse ratbags, ( al-Qaida and the Taliban ) , condemned this "crime against Islam and the entire Muslim nation," called on the United States to bring Jones to justice and demanded "a satisfactory response to the anger of over 1.5 billion Muslims around the world."

Thus Karzai made sure his countrymen knew what happened 10,000 miles away and after Friday prayers in Mazer-e-Sharif, a mob, further inflamed by imans descended on the U.N. compound. When they left, seven U.N. employees lay dead, two of them beheaded! Not one country told them that to respond with irrational violence against people who were not involved with the burning is just savagery. And here we are sending our troops to fight in a dead-shit country to save medieval dead-shits from another bunch of fanatical dead-shits. Who and what are we fighting for?

These killers are monstrous Muslim scum. They have assassinated innocent people who were in their country to help with protection and support. And yet instead of calling them monstrous bastards and demanding that Islamic leaders stop inciting and approving such behavior, Western governments and media elites are blaming not the murderers and rioters, but the man behind the Koren-burning. This assumed that the Muslims who were rioting and killing had no control over their reactions and this could not be held accountable for them: according to misguided leftists, it is the West's responsibility to make sure the Islamic world behaves in a civilized manner. Oh Please!! How paternalistic and ethnocentric of those most committed to multiculturalism and will appease at any price.

Obama and Ban Ki-Moon found the burning of the Koran distasteful, as I do. But that was why they should have stood up for Terry Jones. Obama could have said: "While I disapprove of this Koren-burning, in America we believe that freedom of expression is a fundamental bulwark against tyranny and the hallmark of a truly FREE SOCIETY, and it requires us to put up with things we don't like without responding with violence, like you assholes." He could, in short, have used Jones' barbecued Koran as a teaching tool to demonstrate why free societies are preferable to archaic Sharia states. But instead, he, Ki-Moon and the "lame-stream" media effectively reinforced the principle that violent intimidation works, instead of telling these "rabid dogs" to grow up and act like civilized people. These Muslims are demanding that free people change to the way they behave so instead of only getting fleas we'll be getting a case of rabies as well! Not likely!

The Way I See it....everyone in the world is so busy condemning Terry Jones that they have forgotten about freedom of expression and why it is so important to reinforce even when we find the expression detestable---indeed, especially in such cases. And so, if we continue down this path, one thing is certain: That which is not understood or valued will not be protected and so it will be lost.

Those who appease and censor themselves today to keep from offending Muslims may wish in the the not-to-distant future that they had stood up more robustly for their freedom of speech when it was threatened. But by then, when they're beheaded, there will be no chance for them to get that word out.

U.S. Pollies See the Light !

How many bureaucrats does it take to screw in a light bulb? None...if that bulb is a traditional incandescent bulb. That's because back in 2007 the government passed a law that effectively bans traditional incandescent light bulbs starting in 2012. This is unfortunately true for Australia as well.

This light bulb-banning law was another one of those good intentions foisted upon us by the "watermelons" that now many people don't think is turning out so good. They don't like the light given off by these compact fluorescent light bulbs. They are annoyed that these bulbs can't be used on a Dimmer Switch. And to add insult-to-injury they cost a lot more, making the idea of saving money a farce. The pie-in-the-sky environmentalists who seem to be against anything that even hints of being poisonous, totally ignore the fact that the amount of mercury in one bulb is enough to contaminate up to 6,000 gallons (22,712 liters) of water beyond safe drinking levels. If you break one, you should rush to open up the windows and keep animals and children out of the room. Wear gloves as you delicately put broken pieces in a separate bag and vacuum carefully or call a HAZMAT crew. Wonderful isn't it?

A political-advocacy group in the United States, called Freedom Action (including some Federal Senators) recently launched a campaign to repeal the ban in the incandescent bulbs. The question they ask is WHY should a select few politicians four years ago be able to tell hundreds of millions of people what light bulbs are best for them? Especially when it's been shown that all this conversion won't make a hell of lot of difference to global warming. They have introduced a bill aptly called the Better Use of Light Bulbs (the BULB Act) that would repeal the 2007 Energy Law that would let the light of incandescent shine brightly once again.

The Way I See It....people should have a choice. I think it's fine if someone wants to fill his home or business with the light from the new bulbs. I also think it is fine if someone wants to buy an old-fashioned bulb because it works better for him or her. If left alone, the best bulb will win its rightful standing in the market place.

Eight Myths of a Carbon Tax

Yesterday I posted the shocking news about Julia Gillard's Labor Government's strong willingness to push a Carbon Tax on Australian businesses thereby negatively affecting all Australians with a sharp rise in the cost of essential goods and services. Today I hope to clarify for the uninformed why the Carbon Tax is punitive and impractical.

Firstly, the greatest Myth, constantly reiterated by Gillard, is that if we lead the world in carbon pricing the rest of the world will follow. Julia's kidding herself. Australia produces 1.5% of the world's CO2, China and America account for 40%. A 5% reduction (as proposed) would be cancelled out by as little as a 0.3% increase in China's emissions.

Secondly, the Myth that we have to lead the world because we are a carbon-based economy and will be more affected when the world introduces carbon pricing. The reality is that our carbon-based economy is one of our main competitive advantages. To lead on a carbon tax puts our industry at a serious disadvantage against our competitors. Besides a carbon tax on imports from countries without CO2 pricing is unworkable.

Another Myth says if we introduce the tax now it will give industry time to adapt. Industry needs years to make the investment to meet the new environmental constraints. Planning approval alone can take four or more years. The logic of starting a carbon tax in barely 12 month's time has not been thought through; five years would barely be enough.

Myth Number 4 is that Big Business should have known a carbon tax was coming and should've been prepared. Well...most of our coal-fired power stations were built and owned by state governments. The taxpayer is the largest single owner with 36% in Victoria, 54% in NSW and 67% in Queensland. The taxpayers and foreign investors virtually will lose equity without substantial compensation. Indeed, CO2 trading in Europe, the obvious precedent scheme, was accompanied by the issue of close to 100% free permits to the power generators for the first decade. Without compensation there will be a dangerous level of risk for long-term investment in Australia. Good-bye economic growth and stability.

Here's Myth Number 5: it says we are morally obligated to lead the way because we generate a larger proportion of CO2 a head of population. Yes...we do, but there are good reasons for this. We have a significant agricultural sector and are a large exporter of beef and lamb, which are CO2 emitters. Given the size of the country, our transport consumption is higher than most of the densely settled economies we ship to. Exports contribute to more than 30% of Australia's carbon emissions. If we want to cut emissions sharply, should we stop exporting?

The sixth Myth that the carbon tax will hit the so called 1000 BIG POLLUTERS and consumers will be protected. In the end the consumer will always pay. The four Bullshit-Artists in the photo above know that if the cost is not passed on, trade exposed industry in particular will either fail to survive (and jobs lost), or move elsewhere (loss of jobs again). The concept of charging the big emitters and passing the proceeds back to the consumer is fatally flawed.

Then there is the Myth #7 that renewable energy can replace coal and gas-fired energy production without substantial cost to the home consumer or businesses. Putting aside the serious issues of reliability, availability and transmission, the cost of all the available renewables, such as wind and solar is far higher than coal. And still nuclear energy is stupidly ignored. I plan on exposing the renewable fairytale in future postings.

And last but not least, Myth Number 8 says that a carbon tax or ETS will force the same BIG POLLUTERS to invest in alternative technologies that will create jobs. The naive expectation that investors who have seen their investment seriously impaired by a carbon tax will race to invest in new high-cost technologies is illogical. Banks won't lend to these impaired incumbents as they have seen a number of European countries enthusiastically embrace renewable installations and found they didn't create the volume of new jobs their millions of Euros were buying. Spain is one example of the false promise of Green technology that lead to bankrupting the country.

The Way I See It....Julia Gillard and her gang-of-four know full well the consequences of allowing the Climate Change fraud to be perpetrated on the Australian people. The general public are beginning to see that with Australia's meager contribution to the so-called rise in "dangerous" CO2 world-wide, any showing off to the world what "good scouts" we are to sacrifice our economic wellbeing and lifestyle is too costly. No...if the Vikings in 900AD could cope with being 3 degrees hotter than we are today I'm sure we and our air conditioning can make a good go of it as well.

Carbon Tax Shock Downunder!

Australians were shocked yesterday to see how the real impact of Prime Minister, Julia Gillard's leaked Carbon Tax proposal will hit their home budgets. This is the same ass-kissing-Greens Laborite who lied when she said she wasn't going to bring in a Carbon Tax during her election campaign and then tried to talk the United State's President Obama, at last month's visit, into joining her in implementing this no-win, tax. Thankfully the US Congress isn't buying it

Australian households face price rises of $863 a year - $16.60 a week - for essentials including electricity, gas, petrol and food under the Federal Government's tax. This doesn't factor in small business people's expenses. Secret Treasury documents revealed that these figures are based on a tax of $30 a tonne and were prepared on February 1. If the tax on petrol is excluded the price for households is ONLY $608 a year - $11.70 a week. For the tax to cut our emissions by the Government's target, petrol and farm emissions will later have to be included and the $30 a tonne must certainly rise, in all likelihood to $80 a tonne!!!

A week ago, before this revelation hit-the-fan, our newly appointed climate commissioner, Warmist-Fanatic-at-Large, Tim Flannery was in a Washington, D.C. newspaper. He tried to sway politicians to see the "logic" in a Carbon Tax. Mr Flannery is only a zoologist and author of a book on climate change and compares skeptics of global warming to "'flat Earth believers." But he made an amazing point that most global warming alarmists gloss over when he threw down this lightening bolt in an interview: "Even if every country in the world cuts emissions today, global temperatures are not likely to drop for about a thousand years because the 'system' is overburdened with CO2 and its absorption only happens slowly." Of course he still ignores that fact that CO2 only comprises .0038% of our atmosphere and that temperatures were 3 degrees WARMER in 900 AD when the Vikings were running around in short pants and enjoying their new found Greenland.

The stunned interviewer said: "That doesn't seem like a good deal...surely someone must have done the sums that for all these billions of dollars we're spending on renewable programs and pushing carbon caps that it's got to have a consequence in terms of cutting the world's temperature by a fair amount...right?'' Flannery responded: "It's going to be slight."

The Way I See It....a thousand years is a long time to wait for results for the economy-killing trillions going to be spent in the next few years. I find it hard to believe that Julia and her idiot Climate Minister Greg Combet continue to give credence to the smug Bob Brown's Greens agenda (see photo) and other warmist non-experts as Flannery and their stuffed-shirt economist (promoted to chief adviser) Ross Garnaut. Australia has three major climate scientists in residence that the Labor government can ask for factual advice but foolishly ignores them, all to the future determent of the Australian people and their economy unless the majority of Parliamentarians come to their senses and stop its passage in its tracks. One wag has suggested there should be an appropriately named "ass-hole tax" for Parliamentarians so they can personally feel the effects of a tax burden. I'm sure Bob Brown and his boyfriend will "end-up" in the higher bracket as excess users.